Jump to content

Henry B

Members
  • Posts

    9,281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Henry B

  1. Nahhhh. It's a carefully measured build to the finish. With so many of the recent episodes, he's basically said, "This games sucks" and cut to the Cinemassacre logo. This one had a real ending, but it needed all the bad game material to be pulled off.

  2. I did a quick splice of "Kirk Enterprises" and "Star Trek Main Theme" with "End Credits" from Star Trek '09 for a semblance of well rounded listening (the Courage fanfare into the full-fledged Courage theme) to tide me over until some sort of complete score comes around. Man, oh man, is the Wallin mix weak compared directly to the Iwataki mix. The difference is so extreme that this edit is almost unlistenable.

  3. Shut up, Boal. CG isn't automatically horrible every time it's used

    When did I say that? I just said that the CGI in the trailer look bad (the CG elves, Smaug's head, Ninjump Tauriel...). Never said CG is always horrible.

    you misunderstand the effects process if you think these shots aren't full of mattes and hand crafted elements, even though they aren't real location shots.

    Again, when did I say that? Just because I prefer real locations over CG locations doesn't mean I automatically reject every CG location. I'm just saying the CG locations in this trailer don't look really good to me. Yes, I know, it's just a teaser trailer, they have 5 to 6 months to improve these shots, but let's face it, even with the same amount of time, the first film had its fair share of bad CG (Radgy's sled, anyone?). Of course, I'd love to be proven wrong and be impressed by the CG in the final film. But so far, nothing in that trailer impressed me. That is all.

    Dude, the idea that CG is always bad is exactly what you conveyed. Chaac and I complemented the locales and you sarcastically responded "which CG locales are you referring to?" But whatever. Thanks for clearing it up. And no, I didn't think everything in the trailer was great.

  4. There are lots of pretty locales, though.

    Locales look very impressive.

    What CG locales are you referring to?

    Shut up, Boal. CG isn't automatically horrible every time it's used, and you misunderstand the effects process if you think these shots aren't full of mattes and hand crafted elements, even though they aren't real location shots.

  5. So, early in the film, Scotty says to Kirk, "I thought we were explorers," and at the end of the film Kirk speaks about how we shouldn't seek vengeance and forget our true purpose. Was this sort of a wink-wink to people who bemoan how action oriented Star Trek has become? Somehow I don't think the next movie will be about exploration, though. I really don't know what to think about this self-referential fan-service of a film. Is fan-service bad? Maybe not... I certainly enjoyed all the nods. Eh, I'll try to see it again. Also, in 2D. Abrams' shaky cam cinematography and frenetic editing really doesn't lend itself to the 3D experience.

  6. None of the directors after Chris Columbus have shown any interest in such an approach. I remember that after the marginally extended versions of SS and CoS, the directors of 3-7 were given an option to release director's cuts, but declined it. They all seemed to favor the approach of creating successful, self-contained movies rather than excerpts of a larger fantasy universe. (Were they actually successful? Maybe, maybe not.)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.