Jump to content

Hlao-roo

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Jay said:

New promo video

 

 

 

The place needed redecorating, anyway :)

 

 

I caught this, last night. It actually looks pretty good.

Just a QQ, though: if The Tyrrell Corp. made eyes, in 2019, then why is Jared Leto blind..?

Still, they've kept the "swoosh" noise, and the scene is well-cut, and looks gorgeous.

I like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cremeritis!

 

On 8/27/2017 at 6:06 PM, thestat said:

Wow, that is actually a very bad poster. What is this - 2002 with Harry Gregson Williams providing a spastic score to Tony Scott's frantic editing? Or Villeneuve being challenged by the studio. Well, Johannson will do fine, as will Wallfisch - both are capable composers and as long as Balfe, Kaczynski etc. or any of the RCP, are banned this will be great.

Eh fuck off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's so sad how Villeneuve has let us down on this front.  I only hope it was a producer decision.  The answer to whose responsibility it is will probably come with the composer announcement for his next film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, antovolk said:

Looks like JJ is indeed officially off the project. Score credited to Zimmer and Wallfisch 

Aren't you the person who went INSANE on twitter over people saying Johannsson is being replaced and accusing pages who might have more inside info than you of not getting it right? Maybe time for an apology!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, DJan said:

Aren't you the person who went INSANE on twitter over people saying Johannsson is being replaced and accusing pages who might have more inside info than you of not getting it right? Maybe time for an apology!

Who are you, again?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

Who are you, again?

Yeah, this ^

Anyway, people kept misquoting the interview where DV explicitly said they were just 'helping out' JJ. Not a case of inside info but mistranslations. No news sources claimed more inside info that that interview. But looks like those 'misquotes' were indeed proven correct by the poster, so yes I'm having a dinner of crow :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

Who are you, again?

Someone who witnessed that guy throw out insults to people on twitter who could read between the lines of that interview and see what was going on.

2 hours ago, antovolk said:

Yeah, this ^

Anyway, people kept misquoting the interview where DV explicitly said they were just 'helping out' JJ. Not a case of inside info but mistranslations. No news sources claimed more inside info that that interview. But looks like those 'misquotes' were indeed proven correct by the poster, so yes I'm having a dinner of crow :lol: 

Not true, the pages I saw the news at clearly made it sound like they had other (unnamed) sources. And even if they didn't, anyone who understands the business just a little would know that a composer on Zimmer's level wouldn't come in as (per your "theory") an additional composer for a movie scored by Johannsson. That's about as plausible as John Williams composing additional music for Junkie XL's Tomb Raider lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 30-7-2017 at 1:17 PM, Alexcremers said:

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised that more and more music of Johann will be replaced.

 

220px-Alex_North's_2001_Jerry_Goldsmith_

 

Remember my wise words, people!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Disco Stu said:

It's so sad how Villeneuve has let us down on this front.  I only hope it was a producer decision.  The answer to whose responsibility it is will probably come with the composer announcement for his next film.

The thing is, often times any break is the spark that keeps the director and composer apart. See Verbinski and Silvestri, Jonze and Burwell, Anderson and Mothersbaugh, Shyamalan and Howard, Aronofsky and Mansell (these last two remain to be seen, actually). Sacred collaborations are no longer safe. I'm glad Joe Wright went back to Marianelli after the Pan situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they had inside info, they should have added something to the effect of "per our sources, JJ is off the project completely". Every single page I saw who got it 'wrong' was saying that 'Villeneuve revealed that JJ is getting replaced', which is clearly what not he said in the interview. It's not about reading between the lines, it's about good/bad reporting. Thankfully it was only FSR and a few others who had the 'replaced' part, everyone else quoted it accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Koray Savas said:

The thing is, often times any break is the spark that keeps the director and composer apart. See Verbinski and Silvestri, Jonze and Burwell, Anderson and Mothersbaugh, Shyamalan and Howard, Aronofsky and Mansell (these last two remain to be seen, actually). Sacred collaborations are no longer safe. I'm glad Joe Wright went back to Marianelli after the Pan situation. 

Indeed. Perhaps that's why this is most disappointing to me, because Johannsson/Villeneuve seemed like the real deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Alexcremers said:

So we're going to hear JJ and a few tracks by Zimmer but JJ will not get a credit for composer? Is that it?

I suspect any music he wrote thus far will be rejected. 

11 hours ago, Fancyarcher said:

This has Scott's fingerprints all over it. Due's a disaster when it comes to film music. 

Honestly, I think this could very well be Denis' decision. He's the one coming out and saying what's happening and that he wants more of out of the score that Johansson can't provide. I mean, it was his choice to keep the Max Richter temp as the melodic identity of Arrival, after all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember Legend? It wasn't the director's decision to exchange Jerry Goldsmith for Tangerine Dream. Calling Hans Zimmer at the last minute sounds like something a scared producer would do. Maybe JJ went too artsy and experimental?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Stefancos said:

Better to play it safe and not risk the future of the Blade Runner franchise.

It's not about the franchise, I think. It's about this movie and Villeneuve's future. What I mean is, sci-fi movies are very expensive to make and people want to see their money back. I know that a lot of people don't consider what JJ is doing is music. It's possible Villeneuve felt he had to comply with the wish of some high-placed suit in order not put his own career at risk. With other words, he didn't fight for JJ to the death because he thought it might backfire on him.

I'm pretty sure JJ did his own thing and that this might have been the problem.

I wonder if Zimmer will do Zimmer or copy Vangelis ...

 

Of course, it's still possible that the poster is faulty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/6/2017 at 7:10 AM, Koray Savas said:

The thing is, often times any break is the spark that keeps the director and composer apart. See Verbinski and Silvestri, Jonze and Burwell, Anderson and Mothersbaugh, Shyamalan and Howard, Aronofsky and Mansell (these last two remain to be seen, actually). Sacred collaborations are no longer safe. I'm glad Joe Wright went back to Marianelli after the Pan situation. 

Jackson & Shore and the breaking of the fellowship. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nick1066 said:

Jackson & Shore and the breaking of the fellowship. 

Who would've thought monkey business would be the thing to break the two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Koray Savas said:

Honestly, I think this could very well be Denis' decision. He's the one coming out and saying what's happening and that he wants more of out of the score that Johansson can't provide. I mean, it was his choice to keep the Max Richter temp as the melodic identity of Arrival, after all. 

Other then maybe the Vangelis inspired bits, I'm not sure how Villenueve would be disappointed with Blade Runner's score. I mean that Richter piece was only actually used in once in film, near the end, and the rest of Johansson's work basically functioned as sound design. 

8 hours ago, Alexcremers said:

It's not about the franchise, I think. It's about this movie and Villeneuve's future. What I mean is, sci-fi movies are very expensive to make and people want to see their money back. I know that a lot of people don't consider what JJ is doing is music. It's possible Villeneuve felt he had to comply with the wish of some high-placed suit in order not put his own career at risk. With other words, he didn't fight for JJ to the death because he thought it might backfire on him.

I'm pretty sure JJ did his own thing and that this might have been the problem.

I wonder if Zimmer will do Zimmer or copy Vangelis ...

 

Of course, it's still possible that the poster is faulty.

I'm not sure a producer or even an executive would care about film music nowadays. They'd probably prefer the score to stay in the background anyway, which means they'd probably love Johannsson's approach, at least that's what I gather. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Fancyarcher said:

 

I'm not sure a producer or even an executive would care about film music nowadays. They'd probably prefer the score to stay in the background anyway, which means they'd probably love Johannsson's approach, at least that's what I gather. 

It's the fact that it's Zimmer that reeks of a producer's call. Villeneuve's movies never had that  Zimmer odour. That and the way he is suddenly ditching his buddy JJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Alexcremers said:

It's the fact that it's Zimmer that reeks of a producer's call. Villeneuve's movies never had that  Zimmer odour. That and the way he is suddenly ditching his buddy JJ.

Yeah obviously, I'm going with the producer angel too. I just have no idea why they'd replace JJ with Zimmer considering that JJ probably would have given them what they wanted anyway. I'm guessing a producer was just being too nonspecific or something.

59 minutes ago, Stefancos said:

With the way productions are micromanaged these days I'm sure they care very much about the music that accompanies their product.

I'd say they probably care about how "unnoticeable" the music is. A lot of blockbuster scores these days are layered under lots of sound-effects, so you can barely hear anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fancyarcher said:

Other then maybe the Vangelis inspired bits, I'm not sure how Villenueve would be disappointed with Blade Runner's score. I mean that Richter piece was only actually used in once in film, near the end, and the rest of Johansson's work basically functioned as sound design. 

I'm not sure a producer or even an executive would care about film music nowadays. They'd probably prefer the score to stay in the background anyway, which means they'd probably love Johannsson's approach, at least that's what I gather. 

The piece was played almost in its entirety during the dialogue less opening. Johansson wrote an original piece for it but the temp won out in the end.

I still maintain the possibility that this is his decision because typically producer calls result in a press release or an exec talking about the change, not the director himself expressing that he personally wanted more from the music . Zimmer's involvement here is just for PR purposes. It's going to be a Wallfisch score.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Koray Savas said:

The piece was played almost in its entirety during the dialogue less opening. Johansson wrote an original piece for it but the temp won out in the end.

I still maintain the possibility that this is his decision because typically producer calls result in a press release or an exec talking about the change, not the director himself expressing that he personally wanted more from the music . Zimmer's involvement here is just for PR purposes. It's going to be a Wallfisch score.

Isn't that pretty much the case with any of the scores where Zimmer has co-credit though? He just does the theme, and leaves the rest up to his composer / "team" so to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure this is the director's call.  The comments he's made about the situation ring true to me.

And frankly the Zimmer hate some of you have is blinding you to recognising that there are actually projects he might be well suited to contribute to...like this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, publicist said:

Tbh, the decision to keep a fairly blah Richter piece in 'Arrival' instead of providing an original approach to those (important) scenes already points to a tone-deaf director. 

It felt out of place to me. I loved the rest of the score in that movie.

Then again I'm still a bit pissed at the movie for wanting to be a random indie drama instead of a genuine hard sci-flick.

"Do you want to make a baby" oh what the fuck


On 5/9/2017 at 9:39 PM, Stefancos said:

Saw the trailer in the cinema. This doesnt look anything like Blade Runner!

Why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.