• Announcements

    • Jay

      PLEASE DONATE to JWFAN if you can!   08/16/16

      Hello JWFan members,   The team behind JWFan needs your help!   We need annual donations to keep our community running   This is for the domain name, IPBoard license, and server space.   We hope you can help use with a donation of any size.   Use this link or the link on the mainpage. Thank you!   The Administration team
Romão

2012 Oscar Discussion Thread (Tintin and War Horse nominated for Best Original Score!)

447 posts in this topic

JW's loss was not unexpected, but still disappointing.

War Horse is one of the most beautiful scores I've heard in years. I can't say anything against the Artist, since I haven't seen it or heard the score, but JW definitely earned his nominations this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally am not disappointed with the Oscar winner for Best Score.

The thing is, we all know how great Williams' music is, but there really is nothing in either War Horse or Tintin that is all that new or innovative.

They are Williams on great, standard form as far as I can tell. Of course, that is fantastic, and a high bar for any composer to reach.

But The Artist would die completely without the score it had. It's a silent movie, and the score was so much a part of what made it what it was, in a way no other score this year could possibly claim.

As great as Williams is, The Artist was something quite special.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever people think of The Artist (film and score), I'm glad Dujardin got the Oscar for Best Actor. Well deserved. At least, they got that right.

That Oscar belonged to Gary Oldman....

As many have said, Williams loss was expected but still disappointing. But Bource's score was great and I admire the class that Bource displayed. Personally thanking and shaking the hands of his fellow nominees, his humility was touching. I respect Bource and would be very happy with his win if he hadn't stolen it from the maestro...

But still, I'm happy for Bource. Congratulations.

I think the big events at the Oscars tonight was the fact that Plummer won his first Oscar and Streep won her first one in 30 years (no more tiring comedic jabs at her lack of wins). Other than that, everything was terribly predictable, but still a fun watch (as always for me). It was certainly not as dull as last year, although Billy Crystal seemed quite restrained this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I tend to agree that War Horse and Tintin are not all that original in William's canon, either (particularly Warhorse) was as deserving an Oscar as any other because non of their antecedents won an Oscar either. It seems disingenious to say Warhorse is undeserving since it sounds a bit like Far and Away, given the the latter did not win either. War Horse does not sound all that much like Williams's other Oscar wins and neither does Tintin, though maybe ET is a distant relative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@OneBuckFilms

I don't doubt that what you're saying is true, but to use a sports analogy, even though you may acknowledge that the other team deserves it more, you're still disappointed when your team loses the Super Bowl or the World Cup or whatever.

As a JW fan, I feel like John Williams is my "team" and I will always root for him to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever people think of The Artist (film and score), I'm glad Dujardin got the Oscar for Best Actor. Well deserved. At least, they got that right.

That Oscar belonged to Gary Oldman....

If Dujardin didn't win, it would have been Clowney winning. I wouldn't have mind Oldman winning, but it was a Jean Vs George duel from the very beginning, and I'm glad Dujardin was the one taking the Oscar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

War Horse wasnt snubbed if you ask me, it wasnt that great of a film.

Only the score and cinematography were really exceptional. I do think the score deserved to win but after finally seeing Hugo last night I cannot argue with it winning for cinematography. War Horse's cinematography was excellent but Hugo's was really, really, REALLY excellent. The entire film was a joy to watch from the first frame to the last.

You obviously haven't seen The Tree Of Life.

I haven't seen The Tree Of Life yet, but I definitely want to. I'm only speaking of the films I *have* seen, and out of the two I mentioned, I preferred Hugo's cinematography to War Horse's. But both were very good.

You DO NOT want to see "The Tree of Life." Trust me. You have been warned. If you thought a movie like "Mullholland Drive" was disjointed and "out there," this one will be a true head-scratcher, especially when you get to the 30-minute mark. The cinematography was nice, but I wasn't sure why half the shots on screen were being shown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatever people think of The Artist (film and score), I'm glad Dujardin got the Oscar for Best Actor. Well deserved. At least, they got that right.

That Oscar belonged to Gary Oldman....

If Dujardin didn't win, it would have been Clowney winning. I wouldn't have mind Oldman winning, but it was a Jean Vs George duel from the very beginning, and I'm glad Dujardin was the one taking the Oscar.

Fair enough. I thought Clooney was going to take it home this year, but I would prefer Dujardin over Clooney though. But the fact is Oldman deserved that award!

War Horse wasnt snubbed if you ask me, it wasnt that great of a film.

Only the score and cinematography were really exceptional. I do think the score deserved to win but after finally seeing Hugo last night I cannot argue with it winning for cinematography. War Horse's cinematography was excellent but Hugo's was really, really, REALLY excellent. The entire film was a joy to watch from the first frame to the last.

You obviously haven't seen The Tree Of Life.

I haven't seen The Tree Of Life yet, but I definitely want to. I'm only speaking of the films I *have* seen, and out of the two I mentioned, I preferred Hugo's cinematography to War Horse's. But both were very good.

You DO NOT want to see "The Tree of Life." Trust me. You have been warned. If you thought a movie like "Mullholland Drive" was disjointed and "out there," this one will be a true head-scratcher, especially when you get to the 30-minute mark. The cinematography was nice, but I wasn't sure why half the shots on screen were being shown.

Tree of Life is a good film. Its slow paced and disjointed at times, but there is some genuine merit to this intelligent film and I appreciate what Mallick was trying to do. Its not a perfect film, but a great piece of work if you ask me. In the end, its basically the 2001: A Space Odyssey of this generation, except it does a far better job than its incomprehensible predecessor...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tree of Life is a good film. Its slow paced and disjointed at times, but there is some genuine merit to this intelligent film and I appreciate what Mallick was trying to do.

What was Malick trying to do? You might be the first one to know...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Show the struggle between nature and grace on a human being.

Nope. Nature/grace were a symbiotic force, the technocratic man and his actions were the other force, even i figured that out. :pfft:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tree of Life is a good film. Its slow paced and disjointed at times, but there is some genuine merit to this intelligent film and I appreciate what Mallick was trying to do. Its not a perfect film, but a great piece of work if you ask me. In the end, its basically the 2001: A Space Odyssey of this generation, except it does a far better job than its incomprehensible predecessor...

Well I understand people unfamiliar with Kardashev III type civilizations and extropianism and singulitarianism might have a case of future shock with the film. In any case, The Tree of Life is an inferior film to 2001, and it's actually more vague, uncomprehensible and close minded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they said he had no musical training in the ceremony???? as if it was something to be proud of?

OMG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah my jaw dropped when they said that .Exactly at the time the passed by Williams

JW must have cringed too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's what I think: neither Tintin nor War Horse were 'Oscar worthy'.

As I see it something that's better than everything else of its year is Oscar worthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

none of the winners in the past 10 years were Oscar worthy scores

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JW was robbed again! And its just as bad and wrong as losing to Zimmer or Santaolalalala.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no formal training in composition is one thing, but none in orchestration either? that's pretty impressive for a score that's quite colorful in orchestration imho.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im glad i did not stay up for this shambles.

Its a fucking disgrace, and anyone who thinks otherwise should ask for their membership and posts to bd decimated from this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

they said he had no musical training in the ceremony???? as if it was something to be proud of?

OMG

yeah my jaw dropped when they said that .Exactly at the time the passed by Williams

JW must have cringed too

Jesus Christ, do you couple of mongolian inverts even realise that some of western popular culture's most celebrated musical artists are "untrained"?

Whether JW cringed or not should be the least of your worries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funniest moment: Christopher Guest's troupe as test audience for Wizard of Oz.

I thought this was one of the least funny moments.

Most uncomfortable moment: The painfully unfunny "documentary-style" bit with Robert Downey Jr.

I thought that would've been better if the audience had laughed more. There were a few places where I wanted to laugh, but the dead silence after the punchline was so shocking that I didn't.

For me the funniest part was when Billy Crystal said "Eh..." after the giant book of music came up with that super dramatic music. Crystal seemed to get funnier as the night went on up until the Best Score, then he started getting less and less funny as the night finished.

no formal training in composition is one thing, but none in orchestration either? that's pretty impressive for a score that's quite colorful in orchestration imho.

I wonder how heavily he relied on orchestrators?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best ones usually are.

Well, all of them usually are, so I don't think that's a fair statement. Williams and Shore barely use orchestrators, and their stuff is usually great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funniest moment: Christopher Guest's troupe as test audience for Wizard of Oz.

I thought this was one of the least funny moments.

Most uncomfortable moment: The painfully unfunny "documentary-style" bit with Robert Downey Jr.

I thought that would've been better if the audience had laughed more. There were a few places where I wanted to laugh, but the dead silence after the punchline was so shocking that I didn't.

For me the funniest part was when Billy Crystal said "Eh..." after the giant book of music came up with that super dramatic music. Crystal seemed to get funnier as the night went on up until the Best Score, then he started getting less and less funny as the night finished.

no formal training in composition is one thing, but none in orchestration either? that's pretty impressive for a score that's quite colorful in orchestration imho.

I wonder how heavily he relied on orchestrators?

Probably a lot. So?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best ones usually are.

Well, all of them usually are, so I don't think that's a fair statement. Williams and Shore barely use orchestrators, and their stuff is usually great.

Sorry, that was in response to Quint's post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A score half composed by orchestrators, music from Vertigo...what a fucking shambles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And you never whine at all, everything is always ok with you. Isnt it?

That suggests something to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A score half composed by orchestrators, music from Vertigo...what a fucking shambles.

The reason for the Vertigo music in film was only due to the fact that the director wanted the film out for the film festival and the music couldn't be done in time, so the director used the Vertigo music. Bource did however compose music for that scene and its on the album.

Calm down people, yes the maestro lost undeservedly, but personally I think The Artist got the most deserving win since Return of the King...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bource did however compose music for that scene and its on the album.

Irrelevant! If its not in the film, it cannot be taken into consideration.

Why didn't they put the Bource there afterwards?

Because Herrmann is better, most likely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A score half composed by orchestrators, music from Vertigo...what a fucking shambles.

The reason for the Vertigo music in film was only due to the fact that the director wanted the film out for the film festival and the music couldn't be done in time, so the director used the Vertigo music. Bource did however compose music for that scene and its on the album.

Calm down people, yes the maestro lost undeservedly, but personally I think The Artist got the most deserving win since Return of the King...

Bold words, but grounded in reality. I find you agreeable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bource did however compose music for that scene and its on the album.

Irrelevant! If its not in the film, it cannot be taken into consideration.

Why should Bource take the blame for the director's decision? He did his job up to the very last scene, its not his fault that Hermann took his own score's place in the end...

Why didn't they put the Bource there afterwards?

Because Herrmann is better, most likely.

Probably too much effort, or the director ended up liking Vertigo placed at the end. He was fond of the film and its score, so he might have considered it as an apt way to pay homage to it...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now