Jump to content

Schindler's List returning to theaters for 25th anniversary


Jay

Recommended Posts

I am in (greater) NYC so this will 100% get a release here. I am thinking if I want to go see it.

 

To be completely honest I was overwhelmed when I saw it is a teenager. But as time passes, I think less and less of it. It remains a film-making achievement in the technical sense, dazzlingly direction and editing and cinematography and mis-en-scene and staging and production (and score). But it is also schmaltzy and a lot of hokum and gives in to Spielberg's worst tendencies by the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Disco Stu said:

 

I knew you'd say something about that.  As soon as I read it yesterday.  Surprised it took you this long!

 

I didn't see the tagline until Nick1066 pointed it out.

 

Serious question, though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There has indeed been a rise in anti-semitism. And the world in many ways is in a dangerous time (in other ways, however, things are better than ever). 

 

I just think using such language with regards to a film, no matter how good or the subject matter, is a little self-important and pretentious. The "more than ever" sentiment is a little suspect as well. 

 

I'd rather have seen something reflecting the importance of the film itself...or if we must engage in such over-seriousness, then something reflecting the event itself...e.g instead of "more than ever", simply "Never Again".

 

48 minutes ago, Cherry Pie That'll Kill Ya said:

 

I didn't see the tagline until Nick1066 pointed it out.

 

 

Did you miss the girl in red also? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, JoeinAR said:

Have they colorized it or converted it to 3D?  If not why see it again.

Finally, the technology has caught up with Spielberg's original vision. 

 

Karol

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's one of Spielberg's funniest movies despite the subject matter. He felt it necessary to load it with black humor. Schindler waving goodbye to his wife on the train may be the single funniest moment in any SS movie. And Ralph Fiennes whenever he's not picking off people from his deck is the hammiest character ever. Even his execution was played for laughs and it didn't even happen that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheUlyssesian said:

as time passes, I think less and less of it. It remains a film-making achievement in the technical sense, dazzlingly direction and editing and cinematography and mis-en-scene and staging and production (and score). But it is also schmaltzy and a lot of hokum and gives in to Spielberg's worst tendencies by the end.

 

Kind of the same here. I watched it two days ago and think the earlier scenes are much, much stronger, the ghetto especially. I think a major weakness is how apart from Itzhak naturally, and maybe Helen who has 2-3 scenes, all the jews are relegated to at best a few sentences in one scene, then maybe passing in a shot or two afterwards. They're kind of just objects to help Schindler grow into a saintly angel. If there were a bunch of 3-dimensional characters we follow closely and perhaps see some fall along the way (a family and a few friends or something) instead of a crowd of faceless and personalityless (please forgive this crude use of words) bullet- or furnace-fodder with a few featured extras like the police guy who was in the church in the beginning, or the girl with the glasses thrown in, we could have seen both sides and have had attachments to both. Of course it's still effective to see people suffer needlessly but what if the engineer, the boy who hides in the toilet or a person Göth shoots for fun was someone we knew since the first 10 minutes?

 

Yeah, the humour is weird, too. I like the wife cut, it doesn't detract and helps add just a little levity in. The gun jamming is where I can't decide whether to laugh or not, and it was probably intended to be that way. It would fit into Monty Python, but in a Holocaust context I'm not sure it was necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The film originally had some of that, actually:

 

Quote

the score also contains a prominent role for solo violin, which is played on the soundtrack by Itzhak Perlman. Williams had already planned to write something for violin, and hoped to enlist Perlman, before he had seen the film. He was taking his cue from a line in the development of the script that Spielberg subsequently decided to drop. At one point a Jewish violinist briefly glimpsed entertaining in the German Officer’s Club was to become a more prominent character than he did in the end; he was to speak of his disgust at having to entertain the invaders.

 

https://www.jwfan.com/?page_id=4549

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Holko said:

 

Kind of the same here. I watched it two days ago and think the earlier scenes are much, much stronger, the ghetto especially. I think a major weakness is how apart from Itzhak naturally, and maybe Helen who has 2-3 scenes, all the jews are relegated to at best a few sentences in one scene, then maybe passing in a shot or two afterwards. They're kind of just objects to help Schindler grow into a saintly angel. If there were a bunch of 3-dimensional characters we follow closely and perhaps see some fall along the way (a family and a few friends or something) instead of a crowd of faceless and personalityless (please forgive this crude use of words) bullet- or furnace-fodder with a few featured extras like the police guy who was in the church in the beginning, or the girl with the glasses thrown in, we could have seen both sides and have had attachments to both. Of course it's still effective to see people suffer needlessly but what if the engineer, the boy who hides in the toilet or a person Göth shoots for fun was someone we knew since the first 10 minutes?

  

 Yeah, the humour is weird, too. I like the wife cut, it doesn't detract and helps add just a little levity in. The gun jamming is where I can't decide whether to laugh or not, and it was probably intended to be that way. It would fit into Monty Python, but in a Holocaust context I'm not sure it was necessary.

 

That is a major shortcoming. It basically treats the Jews as victims and as a monolith. They are extras in a movie about their historical cultural sociological and life experience. It is a bracing film, but still a little bit Hollywood. It needed more sobriety. 

 

I don't want it to seem like I am dunking on it too much though. I do like it. I think it is a noble and courageous attempt. And it is definitely very well made. But it is not Spielberg's masterpiece or even close to his best film. Its reputation is definitely inflated due to its subject matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@TheUlyssesian, dunk on it, as much as you like, it's only a movie.

Although there are several pieces of work that, IMO, chronicle the historical treatment of Jews, far better than SL, I might just go and watch this, for shits and giggles, and for Ralph Feinnes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheUlyssesian said:

I don't want it to seem like I am dunking on it too much though. I do like it. I think it is a noble and courageous attempt.

 

Exactly the reason I didn't write this out in the movies thread at first, there's a ton that's great about it, but overall to me it fails to live up to its supposed status of "THE piece of media about the Holocaust". I'd immediately place Maus above it in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Holko said:

 

Exactly the reason I didn't write this out in the movies thread at first, there's a ton that's great about it, but overall to me it fails to live up to its supposed status of "THE piece of media about the Holocaust". I'd immediately place Maus above it in that regard.

 

Shoah is the defining documentation of the Holocaust for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not really about the survivors, it's about a chain-smoking womanizing war profiteer hanging out with a psychotic drunken frat boy and realizing that the murder of millions of innocent people is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Horner's Dynamic Range said:

It's not really about the survivors, it's about a chain-smoking womanizing war profiteer hanging out with a psychotic drunken frat boy and realizing that the murder of millions of innocent people is wrong.

 

That... sounds like a great story for a movie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TGP said:

Will they replace the score with a superior selection for this screening?

Yeah all score will be replaced by music tracked from Back to the Future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spielberg doesn't make terrible movies. Never has.

 

It's just that these days he dwells in the land of the merely good rather than the truly great (and Schindler's List is unquestionably the latter).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, TGP said:

Will they replace the score with a superior selection for this screening?

 

"Music From And Inspired By Schindler's List".

Featuring all-time classics as:

YOU CAN'T ALWAYS GET WHAT YOU WANT,

ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST,

FIRE,

LEAVING ON A JET PLANE,

and BELSEN WAS A GAS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Richard said:

Artistic licence...or did it really happen?

That scene comes straight from Keneally's book. It actually happened. Levartov was saved by the incredible coincidence that Amon Goeth's both weapons were faulty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.