Charlie Brigden 7 Posted January 28, 2011 Posted January 28, 2011 Non-Alien prequel is actually an Alien prequel
A24 5,156 Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 "Giger-like" means Giger is not on board?Apparently "Prometheus" is the name of a giant terraforming spaceship.
Naïve Old Fart 13,021 Posted January 29, 2011 Posted January 29, 2011 "Giger-like" means Giger is not on board?The credit will probably say: "Original ALIEN designs by H.R.Giger". Is Amalgamated Dynamics on board?
crocodile 9,724 Posted January 29, 2011 Author Posted January 29, 2011 I'm really curious as to what Damon Lindelof has in store for us. Not that he's the most awesome writer ever. But his work on Lost proves at least that he's really passionate and willing to take a tired concept and have fun with it. He's actually trying to make things interesting.Karol
A24 5,156 Posted January 30, 2011 Posted January 30, 2011 Is Moebius on board? Rambaldi? Ron Cobb?I mean, if all these great individuals aren't on board then what's the use?
A24 5,156 Posted January 30, 2011 Posted January 30, 2011 Michael Fassbender will star opposite Noomi Rapace in Prometheus
Naïve Old Fart 13,021 Posted January 30, 2011 Posted January 30, 2011 Is Moebius on board? Rambaldi? Ron Cobb?I mean, if all these great individuals aren't on board then what's the use?...and, of course, we all want to see Scott working again with Roger Dicken, don't we?
A24 5,156 Posted January 30, 2011 Posted January 30, 2011 Well, he did make sure there was a contrast between the 'little nibbling cutesy pie alien' and the full-grown one.
Jay 46,243 Posted January 31, 2011 Posted January 31, 2011 Non-Alien prequel is actually an Alien prequelMake up your mind Ridley!
Taikomochi 1,460 Posted January 31, 2011 Posted January 31, 2011 Michael Fassbender will star opposite Noomi Rapace in PrometheusNoomi... My love. I am officially excited for this. Glad to see her doing not Swedish films.
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 It's good to see them going for unknown faces. Remember Winona Ryder as the android?Make up your mind Ridley!Just a thought but everyone always said you can't have an Alien movie without Sigourney Weaver so maybe the answer lies in there.Alex
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I don't want this to be related to Alien...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,386 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I would like them to stay away from the whole "Alien chasing human around in darkly lit spaceship/station/colony" as much as possible.Maybe Scott can find a complete new angle that's has not been explored.
Charlie Brigden 7 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I do, I've been waiting ten years for this to happen.
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I would like them to stay away from the whole "Alien chasing human around in darkly lit spaceship/station/colony" as much as possible.Maybe Scott can find a complete new angle that's has not been explored.I'm sure there will be a new mystery and a new threat. Scott knows all too well the old one is weared out. Maybe the Space Jockeys (the creators of the famous monster?) are going to be pretty nasty creatures themselves.
Charlie Brigden 7 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 The old Dark Horse comic had the space jockeys use the aliens as biological warfare, almost like chemical agents. Send in the aliens, who kill or impregnate everyone, then come in and take over when the planet is dead. Ridley's always said he thought of them as genetically engineered weapons (obviously the same line the Company always took as well).
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 There were rumours about the space jockeys doing some really scary things with a few humans.
Wojo 2,458 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 There's probably no good way to make it a prequel to the original Alien using the same characters that wake on the Nostromo (read: with Ripley) and a Xenomorph unless they get their memory wiped before being put into cryosleep.And that's not really a good plot device. It says "do what you want during this movie, because even if you directly influence the next film, it will be forgotten." Since Ripley remembers the events of the previous movie in the sequel, memory wipes are not established as commonplace before cryosleep.Sorry if that was debunked and I'm just trolling. But the space jockeys would be cool to show. They'd present a superior race that created a biological weapon they could not control, which would be analogous to what Weyland-Yutani tried to do later.
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I'm pretty sure we don't have to worry about the presence of the Space Jockeys, wheter the actual space jockeys if it's a prequel or an analogue lifeform if it isn't.
Charlie Brigden 7 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I will say it'll be cool to see that cockpit set again. I wonder how Ridley will shoot it this time.
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 There were rumours about the space jockeys doing some really scary things with a few humans.And any alien who chest-bursts itself from a giant Space Jockey is going to be much bigger than the ones we are familiar with. So there are 3 new potential threats: 1) The planet which is hostile to humans (they plan to terraform it)2) The Space Jockey who's like a Na-vi but certainly not as friendly3) The giant Xenomorph born out of a Space Jockey
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I'm also pretty sure Ridley Scott is doing his own thing and not taking into account the later films, but the original ideas of the creatures instead.
Charlie Brigden 7 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Well, there was a mention of "big aliens".I'd be nice if the queen was ignored and the focus was squarely back on how scary the original alien is.
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I'd be nice if the queen was ignored and the focus was squarely back on how scary the original alien is.Yes, but like I said, Scott is the first to know that this doesn't work anymore.
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I'd be nice if the queen was ignored and the focus was squarely back on how scary the original alien is.Yes, but like I said, Scott is the first to know that this doesn't work anymore.considering his last few films, Scott doesn't know what works anymore.
Ollie 1,375 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I predict this film won't make much of a dent, except to those who worship Ridley Scott.
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Vague statements like these are also easy applicable to the films of Nolan.Alex
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I just want to know if Streitenfeld will be scoring or not.
Ollie 1,375 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 If I were a Nolan fanboy I'd argue with you.However it's not a vague statement, the Alien franchise has become a joke and I can't remember the last relevant film Scott has made.And say what you want about Nolan but he's delivered.
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Well, there was a mention of "big aliens".I'd be nice if the queen was ignored and the focus was squarely back on how scary the original alien is.I don't think the Queen makes it less scary. Actually the creature itself isn't really scary.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 However it's not a vague statement, the Alien franchise has become a joke and I can't remember the last relevant film Scott has made.Gladiator.
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Gladiator bored me to death.I still don't get what went wrong with that one.
Ollie 1,375 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Massive disappointment all around, plus it was almost 11 years ago.
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 And say what you want about Nolan but he's delivered.If we're talking 'success', then yes.
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,386 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Financial and critical success, Alex.
Ollie 1,375 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Critical success can go only so far.It's nice to be recognized by a select few but you've got to be better than that.My bosses think I do a great job but if the business suffers because of the economy then it doesn't matter.
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,386 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 My bosses think I did a great job....
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Financial and critical success, Alex.Just temporary hype, steef. Just ask joey. He's always right ... when it comes to Nolan.
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Nolan is currently better than the current Ridley Scott, but not as good as the first Ridey Scott. Also, Nolan is less a "filmic mercenary" than Scott.(He's obssesed by Blade Runner, by the way. I wonder if he'll do a similar film someday).Just a question, is Snyder temporary hype? Was the original Scott temporary hype?
Ollie 1,375 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 The problem was, they should have stopped the Alien franchise after the second film, actually they should have stopped after the first film.. Not every film needs a sequel.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Massive disappointment all around, plus it was almost 11 years ago.Well you said relevant, and Gladiator boomed in terms of financial and critical success. Honestly I'd take Black Hawk Down over it, but that one didn't do as well.
A24 5,156 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Nolan is currently better than the current Ridley Scott, but not as good as the first Ridey Scott. Also, Nolan is less a "filmic mercenary" than Scott.(He's obssesed by Blade Runner, by the way. I wonder if he'll do a similar film someday).True. And the sad thing is, I do believe Nolan's success wil have an influence on how Hollywood is making films ... but that will pass too.
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 Financial and critical success, Alex.Just temporary hype, steef. Just ask joey. He's always right ... when it comes to Nolan. my personal opinions are always right for me.Nolan failed with inception, succeeded with Dark Knight, failed with batman begins, failed with Prestige. In baseball that's an acceptable percentage. Thats the way I see it.even the great and almighty Alex didn't care much for Robin Hood by Scott. perhaps being knighted has taken his zest away.
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 they weren't worth mentioning. Insomnia was HORRIBLE.
Brónach 1,330 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I've seen Inception and the Batmans. I'm dying to see Mmento, The Prestige and TDKR right now.Also, to make Ridley Scott some justice, I'll have to check out The Duellists.
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 I don't think anyone is criticizing Scott's old stuff.sorry to hear you're dying.
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,386 Posted February 1, 2011 Posted February 1, 2011 sorry to hear you're dying.I'm not!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now