Brónach 1,330 Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Probably deleted because it made no sense.I've seen another deleted scene with the guy that finds Banner after he lands, which was weird, as in "random mentor figure pops up from nowhere for a scene", so the deletion of that was also a good idea.
Jay 46,241 Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 Hmmm, that scene is supposedly here but it's not showing up for mehttp://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/08/20/avengers-deleted-scene/
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,383 Posted September 5, 2012 Posted September 5, 2012 A wise JWFanner once said it's better to be bitchy and slutty.This!
Luke Skywalker 2,383 Posted October 6, 2012 Posted October 6, 2012 The Avengers Deleted Scene Reveals Dark Alternate Openingthere is an alternate ending too that continues where the opening left out.Its as if the movie was maria hill remembering the facts, and then changes her mind.
Jay 46,241 Posted October 6, 2012 Posted October 6, 2012 [media=] Wow, that was a SPOT ON analysis, pretty funny
Luke Skywalker 2,383 Posted October 6, 2012 Posted October 6, 2012 damn.. cap america really seems to have an earpiece for communicating (he acts like he does) but does not have one...weirrd.
Brónach 1,330 Posted October 6, 2012 Posted October 6, 2012 I absolutely love the film, and I find that video hilarious.
Luke Skywalker 2,383 Posted October 6, 2012 Posted October 6, 2012 maybe shield put some comunicator chip inside their skulls....
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted October 6, 2012 Posted October 6, 2012 Everyone else at SHIELD uses bluetooth headsets though, so why wouldn't they just get the implants themselves?
Rachael Foley 10,162 Posted October 6, 2012 Posted October 6, 2012 ...Your stunned silence is very reassuring.
Quintus 6,493 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 Ooo, get you! http://uk.ign.com/articles/2012/10/17/dark-knight-rises-cinematographer-calls-avengers-appalling
Brónach 1,330 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 I loved the cinematography of The Dark Knight Rises, but it's highly ironic that the cinematographer of The Dark Knight Rises accuses The Avengers of illogical storytelling.
Quintus 6,493 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 Can't say I'm especially struck by the photography of either, especially the hoity toityness of Inception. To be perfectly honest I prefer the broader aesthetic of The Avengers, with it's broader, lighter colour palette.
Brónach 1,330 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 I just really liked all the different tricks in TDKR to give it a "white" colour palette, in contrast with the blue of TDK and the orange of BB.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 Pfister is a superb cinematographer. Probably my favorite after Deakins.
Wycket 36 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 Pfister is a superb cinematographer. Probably my favorite after Deakins.He is very good. He is also about to direct his first movie, so those comments were likely nothing more as an attempt to spread awareness of his name and considering how much I've seen them the past couple days I'd say it did the job.
Matt C 605 Posted October 18, 2012 Posted October 18, 2012 Ooo, get you! http://uk.ign.com/ar...ngers-appallingPfister's comments are just tactless and rude. He's a cinematographer and he has every right to criticize another one's work, but I mean come on. The Avengers wasn't a very showy film, cinematography-wise, but it looked great in places and did the job just fine.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted October 19, 2012 Posted October 19, 2012 I think his comments are fine. There's already too much professionalism in the film industry when filmmakers discuss other filmmakers.
Wycket 36 Posted October 22, 2012 Posted October 22, 2012 Exactly.Every one kisses everyone's asses and at least he's got the balls to admit he didn't like what he saw in the Avengers.
Matt C 605 Posted October 22, 2012 Posted October 22, 2012 There's a difference between saying you didn't like something and openly provoking conflict. The way he said it, it's almost like he's taunting McGarvey into firing back.At least Whedon went the classy response route.
Score_Fan 37 Posted October 22, 2012 Posted October 22, 2012 Something along the lines of"What a shame. I'm a fan of his"; and that's it.
Wycket 36 Posted October 22, 2012 Posted October 22, 2012 I agree with saying it was appalling was uncalled for. But he clarified his statements in the exact same interview saying that he saw them simply using shots to show off sets and effects which isn't necessarily wrong. Wrong word choice: probably, but not necessarily incorrect sentiments.
Delorean90 47 Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 I haven't seen any films McGarvey shot before The Avengers, but Anna Karenina looks absolutely stunning--I was kind of surprised to find it was shot by the same DP. I guess it's just the aesthetic Whedon and McGarvey agreed on. I do appreciate the color palette, but I feel like it does suffer some from a certain bareness to its tone.
Matt C 605 Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 I agree with saying it was appalling was uncalled for. But he clarified his statements in the exact same interview saying that he saw them simply using shots to show off sets and effects which isn't necessarily wrong. Wrong word choice: probably, but not necessarily incorrect sentiments.Yeah, as if Pfister himself wasn't guilty of doing the EXACT SAME THING in all three Batman movies.Hypocrite.
Delorean90 47 Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 How do you mean? Come to think of it, I'm kind of confused as to what those comments really mean in general. It seems like that would be one prominent function of shots in a film of this nature...I can't help but think he meant something that he wasn't articulating very well.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 I agree with saying it was appalling was uncalled for. But he clarified his statements in the exact same interview saying that he saw them simply using shots to show off sets and effects which isn't necessarily wrong. Wrong word choice: probably, but not necessarily incorrect sentiments.Yeah, as if Pfister himself wasn't guilty of doing the EXACT SAME THING in all three Batman movies.Hypocrite.Not really, actually. Nolan's Batman films are quite minimalistic in how they're shot. The Dark Knight Rises may be an exception here, but a lot of the action scenes are filmed quite close.
Matt C 605 Posted October 23, 2012 Posted October 23, 2012 Not really, actually. Nolan's Batman films are quite minimalistic in how they're shot. The Dark Knight Rises may be an exception here, but a lot of the action scenes are filmed quite close.I see a lot more establishing 'money shot/set decoration' shots in Batman Begins. The upwards panning of the League's mountain base as Bruce arrives, the early establishing shots of Iceland, the sequence where Batman ambushes Crane and his lackeys in the abandoned apartment complex and so forth. And as for the action sequences, they may be tightly-shot but they do allow the CGI and scale models to be shown off to their best advantage (especially the train pursuit in BB and the various shots of The Bat in action in the third film).I'm not a trained cinematographer, but Pfister's work on The Dark Knight Rises is no less showier than McGarvey's work on The Avengers. There's a few instances where both directors seem to be indirectly channeling one another in places... and not just the climatic action set-piece but one scene near the end of "Rises" that felt inspired from Whedon's Buffy.
Wycket 36 Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 Yeah, I don't necessarily understand why he said what he said considering that he basically does the same thing. But I still think it boils down to him trying to make a name for himself away from Nolan.
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,383 Posted October 24, 2012 Posted October 24, 2012 Visually The The Avengers doesn't have the same flair as TDKR. Which looked great in IMAX.
Luke Skywalker 2,383 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 um i supposed this was mentioned before...Ijust heard this Led zeppelin song in the radio calle Kashmir on the radio... And i must say that its main rythm has an uncanny resemblance to Silvestri's Avenger's Main theme. Rachael Foley 1
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,383 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 The actual Avengers theme? I don't hear it, you have any time index to compare?
Ollie 1,375 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 It's blocked in the US so I can't compare.
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,383 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 It doesn't work on a mobile device either.
Wojo 2,458 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 I know Led Zeppelin's "Kashmir" inside and out, and I don't hear anything close enough that I would consider "uncanny." There is a slight similarity in the rhythm -- three short notes followed by a rest -- but the bass line in "Kashmir" is much slower and actually changes its pitch to work as the driving melody of much of the song, while the bass line in the Avengers' main theme is just there to support the melody, which is totally different.
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,383 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 That's why I'm stunned by the comparison. Kashmir kicks ass though.
Wojo 2,458 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 You do, of course, realize it's a rock song with words that serves no soundtrack usage whatsoever, don't you?Or is the facial hair pulling you back into the damp dark 70s?
Luke Skywalker 2,383 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 well the background ruthm sounded pretty similar to me...but i must be deaf.well maybe it was not the avenger main theme... its the musical rythm than opens the film and the end credits.
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 12,383 Posted November 8, 2012 Posted November 8, 2012 The SHIELD theme? No I'm sorry Manuel
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted November 9, 2012 Posted November 9, 2012 My friend once said "Kashmir" was just the Bond theme. Now it's The Avengers? All I hear is Zeppelin.
Luke Skywalker 2,383 Posted November 9, 2012 Posted November 9, 2012 Im just relieved Williams did not write that tune. (i doubt he would write something like that anyway)because the forum would be mad critisizim his plagiarism :roll:
Wojo 2,458 Posted November 9, 2012 Posted November 9, 2012 People accused Muse of ripping off a John Williams melody, and there was great heartache on the board for weeks.But if John Williams had ripped off a Led Zeppelin melody, people here would accuse Jimmy Page of travelling into the future and ripping off John Williams, because John Williams is above that.
Luke Skywalker 2,383 Posted November 9, 2012 Posted November 9, 2012 in the old days? maybeNow? I doubt it.Sometimes i'm afraid writing i like Williams...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now