Quintus 6,495 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I know exactly what you mean. Unless it's a throwaway entertainment flick like Thor, I HATE having to share the cinema with the chav scum and their noises.Mind you, I'd have thought the sort of folk who go to see Tree of Life will be like-minded, so I'll take my chances.
crocodile 9,724 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 Only the chosen one can endure this!I am never distracted in cinema. And even if I was I don't want to miss this one.Karol
filmmusic 3,269 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I'll watch this film in a 4 days at the cinema and really can't wait.One question to those who have seen it:Does it use a lot of classical music as in other Mallick films?Or is it only the Desplat score?Edit: Oh, never mind. I just saw the first page..Although, if it uses all those pieces, what is left for Desplat? anyway..
Maurizio 6,913 Posted May 24, 2011 Author Posted May 24, 2011 I'll watch this film in a 4 days at the cinema and really can't wait.One question to those who have seen it:Does it use a lot of classical music as in other Mallick films?Or is it only the Desplat score?Edit: Oh, never mind. I just saw the first page..Although, if it uses all those pieces, what is left for Desplat? anyway..In the final cut, almost nothing of Desplat's original score survives. The film is scored completely with pre-existing music. I recognized only a couple of brief cues and nothing more. I'm very curious to hear the OST album now.
A24 5,156 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I am never distracted in cinema. Sure, because you're the distractor ... with your plate of nachos and that bucket of popcorn! You think you own the theater!
filmmusic 3,269 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I'll watch this film in a 4 days at the cinema and really can't wait.One question to those who have seen it:Does it use a lot of classical music as in other Mallick films?Or is it only the Desplat score?Edit: Oh, never mind. I just saw the first page..Although, if it uses all those pieces, what is left for Desplat? anyway..In the final cut, almost nothing of Desplat's original score survives. The film is scored completely with pre-existing music. I recognized only a couple of brief cues and nothing more. I'm very curious to hear the OST album now.OMG! poor Desplat! I wouldn't like something like this to happen to me..i wonder why on earth Mallick hires them since he's gonna stick to his classical music pieces after all...Money for nothing...
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I'll watch this film in a 4 days at the cinema and really can't wait.One question to those who have seen it:Does it use a lot of classical music as in other Mallick films?Or is it only the Desplat score?Edit: Oh, never mind. I just saw the first page..Although, if it uses all those pieces, what is left for Desplat? anyway..In the final cut, almost nothing of Desplat's original score survives. The film is scored completely with pre-existing music. I recognized only a couple of brief cues and nothing more. I'm very curious to hear the OST album now.OMG! poor Desplat! I wouldn't like something like this to happen to me..i wonder why on earth Mallick hires them since he's gonna stick to his classical music pieces after all...Money for nothing...Not at all. Malick is very particular about his marriage of music and sound. He uses classical music to edit to, and that's why he mostly keeps those pieces in the the final cut. Maurizio, have you not heard the album? If no, then how can you be sure there were only two pieces by Desplat in the film?
Maurizio 6,913 Posted May 24, 2011 Author Posted May 24, 2011 I can't be sure fo course, but it appears that most of Desplat's contributions were scrapped.
Romão 2,473 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I know it is far from being the main focus of the film, but how did Mallick handle the Creation and Dinosaur scenes? CGI? I'm bursting with curiosity how he handles elements he can't film physically
crocodile 9,724 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I am never distracted in cinema. Sure, because you're the distractor ... with your plate of nachos and that bucket of popcorn! You think you own the theater!Crunch, munch, munch, om nom nom, gulp-gulp.... burp!Karol
Brónach 1,330 Posted May 24, 2011 Posted May 24, 2011 I know it is far from being the main focus of the film, but how did Mallick handle the Creation and Dinosaur scenes? CGI? I'm bursting with curiosity how he handles elements he can't film physicallyThe script states "CGI" when it jumps to these.
Brónach 1,330 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Listening to the score. Not a fan. I like the more athmospheric cues, though.
Rachael Foley 10,162 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 I am never distracted in cinema. You think you own the theater!We kinda do, I mean, we pay for the tickets [EDIT:] and concessions [END EDIT], which I am sure plays a part in keeping the theatre open
Jay 46,243 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Almost all of the ticket money goes right back to the studis. Theaters make almost all their money from concession sales
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 For every ticket, the theater gets $1. Something like that. The longer the film stays in the theater, the higher the cut from the ticket price.
crocodile 9,724 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 That's why drinks and stuff like that are so expensive.Karol
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted May 25, 2011 Posted May 25, 2011 Yes, and the poor underpaid concession peeps are the ones who gets all the shit from the customer.I'll take a bag of Twizzlers.$4.50What?! This is absolutely ridiculous! How can you do this?No one's forcing you to buy it fuck tard, but you'll complain and then buy it anyway and thus feed the thing you hate. Prices wouldn't be so high if people didn't cave in.Sorry, had a little flashback there
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted May 26, 2011 Posted May 26, 2011 Not word for word, but that's the average reaction. Occasionally you'll get someone with brains who will clarify that it's not your fault.
Jay 46,243 Posted June 14, 2011 Posted June 14, 2011 LOL Check out Terence Malick's instructions to projectionists for the moviehttp://www.slashfilm.com/terrence-malicks-instructions-project-the-tree-life-film-director/
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted June 15, 2011 Posted June 15, 2011 Yeah I saw that awhile back. Good stuff. It's unfortunate though, because I guarantee that letter has been ignored 75% of the time.
Jay 46,243 Posted July 13, 2011 Posted July 13, 2011 Apparently there's a 6 hour version on the wayhttp://www.slashfilm.com/terrence-malick-prepping-sixhour-version-the-tree-life/
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 I have no desire to see the dullish looking film about a person with no self worth trying to find his reason for his pitiful existance. Make him fat and put him on the show the Biggest Loser.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 I knew there would be an extended cut, but not this extended!I still want to read the script so I can understand the ending better.
Brónach 1,330 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 I knew there would be an extended cut, but not this extended!I still want to read the script so I can understand the ending better.Even though I haven't seen it I think this would be too extended.
crocodile 9,724 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 The are currently showing the film not far from where I live so I intend to go see it this weekend.Karol
Brónach 1,330 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 I'll go see it next September, which is good because then I'll be able to see it in English.
nightscape94 968 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 I saw this film a couple of weeks ago and absolutely loved it, however there is no need for a 6 hour version. The film is fine the way it is and perfectly conveys itself within its current parameters.Anything longer would be repetitious and unnecessary, unless there was some major plot point that was excised that would add to the overall theme or change the actual telling of the film.Tim
Taikomochi 1,460 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 Yes, six hours would be excessive. While I liked the film a lot, I would not even take the time to watch a cut that long. The film began to test my patience as a two hour film. Jeez, if it was six...
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 14, 2011 Posted July 14, 2011 All of Malick's films usually start at around 6 hours in length. Takes him years to edit them down.I don't think we'll see the version being discussed here, but I'm expecting something around 3 hours when the Blu comes out. There was, what looked liked, a great scene in the trailer, that was absent from the final cut. The brother's ear being burned was never clearly explained. I believe mini Sean Penn set fire to something (shown in the trailer) and burned his brother. In the final cut, the scene was cut down to literally a single frame.
Jay 46,243 Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 LOL. A theater in Stamford CT posted this sign when they were showing the movie:http://incontention.com/2011/06/23/no-refunds/ Not Mr. Big 1
Taikomochi 1,460 Posted July 28, 2011 Posted July 28, 2011 That will probably only make more people want to see it out of curiosity.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Am I the only one that thinks it's sad that we have to warn people about films that go beyond the mainstream?
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted October 12, 2011 Posted October 12, 2011 The film is out on Blu today. I watched it earlier tonight, and was completely entranced.There was a wealth of information and detail that I picked up that went over my head upon my theatrical viewing. Unfortunately there are no special features aside from a 30-minute featurette, which has Nolan, Fincher, and most of the cast and crew discussing their experience. Even squeezed Desplat in at the end for a few words.The Lacrimosa sequence is, simply put, one of the greatest things I've ever seen. The film opens with you to turn your volume all the way up just like with The Thin Red Line. Gotta love Malick.
publicist 4,650 Posted October 12, 2011 Posted October 12, 2011 LOL. A theater in Stamford CT posted this sign when they were showing the movie: Let me guess: "This wasn't like BRIDE WARS!!! I want my money back!"
Brónach 1,330 Posted October 12, 2011 Posted October 12, 2011 A cinema here changed your ticket for a different film if you got out before half an hour.The Lacrimosa sequence is, simply put, one of the greatest things I've ever seen. The film opens with you to turn your volume all the way up just like with The Thin Red Line. Gotta love Malick.When we see for the first time planets casting shadows around the very young stars I was deeply moved.I also liked the beginning of the sequence with the mother wondering where was God, and suddenly BLAM.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted October 12, 2011 Posted October 12, 2011 I highly recommend anyone who has seen the film to check out the making of featurette. The way they filmed some of those space sequences is mind-boggling. The kids never read the script and their wardrobe was whatever they happened to be wearing that day. Their audition tapes were pretty much just to talk to Jessica Chastain randomly while being filmed.
Demondm810 473 Posted October 12, 2011 Posted October 12, 2011 Just picked this up on Blu-Ray. Exciting about watching it. Trying to wait until the weekend to give it the time it deserves!
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 Tree of Life is going to be reedited into a longer version.OMG wasn't it long enough the first time. as in too long.
Jay 46,243 Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 Wow you're righthttp://www.slashfilm.com/terrence-malick-prepping-the-tree-of-life-directors-cut-voyage-of-time-coming-in-2014/Guess I need to see the original now
crocodile 9,724 Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 I don't think there's any need. It's a marvelously looking film with some interesting ideas.Karol
hornist 1,261 Posted May 3, 2013 Posted May 3, 2013 I've never seen the film but I'll wait for this release. I hope it will be more than six hours.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted May 4, 2013 Posted May 4, 2013 I've never seen the film but I'll wait for this release. I hope it will be more than six hours.I know you're being sarcastic but I can guarantee this new cut won't be that long.I don't think there's any need. It's a marvelously looking film with some interesting ideas.KarolThere's very little need, but the missing material was noticeable to me and I think its inclusion will flesh it out much better. Based on the description that Jay posted, it seems like he'll add in the fire scene, or what he refers to as the "loss of innocence." I said this back when the film came out, but the scene is in the trailer and in the theatrical cut it was cut down to a single shot.Now if only PTA would but back those missing scenes in The Master. That one doesn't feel complete.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now