Xander Harris 9,674 Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Doesn't this look amazing? Don't you just want to see it?
BloodBoal 8,711 Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 Teaser poster for Sam Raimi's Oz The Great And PowerfulI have to say, I like it very much.
crocodile 9,724 Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 It's ok, but I'm not sure what "visionary" means anymore.Karol
KK 3,313 Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 I like the poster too, but I'm waiting for this to turn out like Alice in Wonderland did.
Wojo 2,458 Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 It's ok, but I'm not sure what "visionary" means anymore.If Helen Keller were a director...it wouldn't be like her at all.
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted July 17, 2012 Posted July 17, 2012 so marvel thinks Guardians of the Galaxy will be a huge boxoffice success.Hmmmm.I think they are wrong.
KK 3,313 Posted July 17, 2012 Posted July 17, 2012 Aronofsky is building the set for his next film; a seemingly old fashioned Biblical epic currently titled as Noah. I'm quite curious as to what it'll turn out to be.http://www.cinemaspy...surfaces-14712/
indy4 160 Posted July 17, 2012 Posted July 17, 2012 Aronofsky is building the set for his next film; an old fashioned Biblical epic currently titled as Noah. I'm quite curious as to what it'll turn out to be.http://www.cinemaspy...surfaces-14712/
crocodile 9,724 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 Great poster!And here's the full trailer:[media=]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rnovAgwS1V4Looks like a great film to me.Karol
A24 5,155 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 The first teaser was weirdly intriguing. This official trailer makes it seem much more like a conventional film, one that is driven by dialog, story and all kinds of characters. I'm still gonna watch it, of course.Marvel's second 2014 picture – which has been announced but kept secret for the past year or two – is none other than the long-rumored (and -debated) Guardians of the Galaxy.Alex
crocodile 9,724 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 The first teaser was weirdly intriguing. This official trailer makes it seem much more like a conventional film, one that is driven by dialog, story and all kinds of characters. I'm still gonna watch it, of course.Actually, Alex, I find it very intriguing visually as well. Don't you?Karol
A24 5,155 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 The first teaser was weirdly intriguing. This official trailer makes it seem much more like a conventional film, one that is driven by dialog, story and all kinds of characters. I'm still gonna watch it, of course.Actually, Alex, I find it very intriguing visually as well. Don't you?KarolIt could be compactness of the trailer, but like I said, the visuals only seem to serve the plot and the characters, while in the first teaser, it felt like the visuals had the upper hand. I'm a little bit surprised about the talkativeness of the movie.
crocodile 9,724 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 Oh yeah, I know what you mean. But then again, it still can go either way.Karol
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 it's looks stupid as hell. definately for kids with OCD, or HDD.
Romão 2,473 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 I'm a fairly avid comic book reader (Batman mostly, though), and I didn't even know that thing existed
Wycket 36 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 Guardians is basically Green Lanterns for the Marvel verse. There was an episode of the animated Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes which featured them and did a good job portraying the characters. A good twenty minute intro for anyone to see if they'd be interested in the movie.
Wojo 2,458 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 Oooh. And Green Lantern was such a box office success for the DC universe, how could this one lose?
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 Oooh. And Green Lantern was such a box office success for the DC universe, how could this one lose?well it has a gun toting skunk thing, she hulk, a bug from the series Star Trek Enterprise, and the blue guy from watchman so how can it?
Brónach 1,330 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 They could do right where Green Lantern failed. This decade needs a good space-opera.
Brónach 1,330 Posted July 20, 2012 Posted July 20, 2012 I'm talking about this decade, not a retread of the 60's.
nightscape94 968 Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 This needs to be in the theaters now!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pALMMIoxTzY&feature=player_embedded
A24 5,155 Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 Why is the blue/white guy, who looks nothing like the blue guy from Watchmen, holding Captain America's shield? Did he kill him for it? Maybe this gang is really rough, tough and dangerous.Alex
A24 5,155 Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 Apparently, it's set in the far future, namely, the 31th century. That could explain why the shield is still around but Captain America is not. All the old superheroes have died.
Brónach 1,330 Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 They'll probably "present" Thanos in this one.
JoeinAR 1,957 Posted July 21, 2012 Posted July 21, 2012 Why is the blue/white guy, who looks nothing like the blue guy from Watchmen, holding Captain America's shield? Did he kill him for it? Maybe this gang is really rough, tough and dangerous.Alexhe's gotten ashy over the years and develop vitiligo.
Wycket 36 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 They'll probably "present" Thanos in this one.That's the idea I gather. They're saying he may not even be in Avengers 2 and they may wait til the third anyway at this point so seeing him in this movie would probably be a good appetizer.
hornist 1,261 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 The future of the film seems to be very dark. Endless remakings, reboots, beginnings etc of the superheros. all scored by zimmer.Yea those four chords like in Inception. Ok I saw newest Bat movie today, his theme had only two chords but an ingenious crescendo towardsthat second note of this theme. If the future is bright there will certainly be three chords.
BloodBoal 8,711 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 You're insane. Two and a half chords at the most, I'd say.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 The future of the film seems to be very dark. Endless remakings, reboots, beginnings etc of the superheros.This has been going on for decades. Something people never can seem to grasp. Film is as great as ever, it's just different.
hornist 1,261 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 Ok, but can you deep from your heart say that also the film music is doing fine. That this is the highest point of evolution of film music we have reached: zimmer? Film is as great as ever, it's just different.Nope. Film is in particular all the same, it's different than it was 30 years ago but now it has harmonized. No room for personal takes. Money.And very bland music that least of all, takes any risks. zimmer.
Wojo 2,458 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 a) Does Zimmer score every film currently released and re-score those that may already be in your collection?b) Have Zimmer and his colleagues put Silvestri, Horner, Arnold, Williams, and other traditional film composers completely out of work?c) Might any former Zimmer collaborators show signs of advancing towards a more traditional, less electronic and rock-based sound?If you answer yes to all of these questions without reservation, then the sky isn't falling, it's already fallen and we may as well pour molten bronze into our ear canals before it's too late.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 Ok, but can you deep from your heart say that also the film music is doing fine. That this is the highest point of evolution of film music we have reached: zimmer? Film is as great as ever, it's just different.Nope. Film is in particular all the same, it's different than it was 30 years ago but now it has harmonized. No room for personal takes. Money.And very bland music that least of all, takes any risks. zimmer.Yes, film music is doing great.
hornist 1,261 Posted July 23, 2012 Posted July 23, 2012 Ok maybe it is.But I have to go back to zimmer, is it wise to bring those three chord pieces to the film music? It is coolin the rock music, it's simple, girls will throw their pants and money flows. But with the big orchestra you can do so much more.Nuances. Now it sounded like it's all the same these scores would be played with the synth, no one'll hear the difference.I saw the Bat 3 today, I'm freshly appalled!And mostly I'm sad.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Zimmer is one man. There are plenty of other composers with different styles, both traditional and contemporary, to suit people's tastes.
hornist 1,261 Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 Ok, you are skipping the question. And I think Carthage ought to be destroyed
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 24, 2012 Posted July 24, 2012 How? I'm a Zimmer fan. I have no direct problems with his music or how he composes.
Koray Savas 2,260 Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 I guess that Oldboy remake with Spike Lee behind the camera wasn't a rumor.Not only will that be awful, but Copley says they're making the story more accessible to people than it originally was. In other words, Americans are too lazy to read subtitles and need an entire film remade in order to go out of their way to see it.
Quintus 6,494 Posted July 26, 2012 Author Posted July 26, 2012 Spike Lee? Doesn't his huge chip on his shoulder make him the last director for making something like Oldboy somehow more accessible?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now