Jump to content

Conversations - New Chamber (piano solo) by John Williams


pro-arte

Recommended Posts

How do you feel about the album Sharky? Enjoying it all?

I love the Williams/Davis/Broughton/Desplat pieces. Will need more time to deliver a verdict.

Dare to listen to it!

I'm not musically educated, so i cant tell when something is atonal. Please just answer my question

It is atonal, like most of Williams's other concert pieces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Played this today.

I was surprisingly taken by Broughton's work, especially the 4th movement/piece.

The highlights of this album are the works from Broughton, Davis, Desplat and Williams. Davis and Williams delivered in aces as I expected, but Desplat was a pleasant surprise. It's a more accessible harmonic palette than the other pieces on this album, but those Debussy-ian harmonies really get to you. I wish we could hear the whole thing.

Giacchino's piece was better than I expected. But again, it takes a lot after his film voice and is just not as intersting as the other works. Newman's piece is alright, but I don't see myself revisiting it very often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no musical training and enjoy Williams's film music over his more atonal concert pieces. However, I find the latter engaging in their own right, particularly the concertos. I like, but do not love, Conversations. The movement that I like the most is the last piece which captures the birth of stride. It is nice but leaves me wanting a fully-developed stride piece.

Interestingly, I like much more the scherzo for piano and orchestra, even though the piano idiom is similar to these pieces. Perhaps it is the more tonal orchestral aspect that enhances my appreciation. I remain hopeful that the scherzo turns out to be a movement to a larger concerto. Either way, I find it touching that Williams is returning to his "home" instrument in his later years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you'll like it Steef.

Why not? I like plenty of his concertworks
This one is particularly thorny though, and in the exposed medium of a solo piano, it's even tougher.

Give it a shot though. Hope I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am half way through my first listen (the album arrived today) and I am really liking what I am hearing.The inspirations behind Williams's Conversations seem to have been surprisingly dramatic and contain a series of imaginary narratives (as he so wonderfully describes in the liner notes with his usual eloquence) but he translates it in a less readily accessible form in the music yet it is no less compelling work for its apparent lack of hummability.

The liner notes are very lovely, although I only half understood Don Davis's, perhaps intentionally convoluted note on his piece Surface Tension (a great piece btw.). Great photos of the composers and Cheng throughout as well. A wonderful release all around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never have so many talented people come together to produce so dull an album as this. The liner notes were interesting though!

That's the spirit! Try to find some good in everything Blume! Or should I call you Bluhr now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be absolutely fair, the performance and the recording quality is a bit...meh, and I know how important performance can be to actually appreciating more technical exercises like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be absolutely fair, the performance and the recording quality is a bit...meh, and I know how important performance can be to actually appreciating more technical exercises like this.

Hey Randy is laying in Hollywood sugar thick and fast! I agree on the recording though. I would prefer some more resounding acoustics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While most solo piano classical recordings sound very roomy or hally, I like a recording of a piano to be 'close miked' (or the perspective of the player). What's the deal with Conversations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But everything sounds hollowed out and bloated, so it sounds roomier than it actually is. The effect is you lose the low end loses oomph and the high end of the piano loses it's sparkle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Questionable mic placement.

Phase cancellation due to breaking the 3:1 rule, or maybe poor choice of mics (a pair of large rather than small diaphragm condensers)?

Re: miking distances - for angular and pointillistic pieces I prefer close miking, but if we're talking about lots of pedal work and a 'carpet of notes' - then room mics are more appropriate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to recording a solo piano there's close and there's close. This disc is pretty average classical close. People's ears are probably used to cinematic close with the mics actually in the piano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to recording a solo piano there's close and there's close. This disc is pretty average classical close. People's ears are probably used to cinematic close with the mics actually in the piano.

That's probably it. I've never really liked classical recording norms anyway. Everything's too live. It's like the Steve Albini school of production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to recording a solo piano there's close and there's close. This disc is pretty average classical close. People's ears are probably used to cinematic close with the mics actually in the piano.

That's probably it. I've never really liked classical recording norms anyway. Everything's too live. It's like the Steve Albini school of production.

Who is Steve Albini and what does he do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it comes to recording a solo piano there's close and there's close. This disc is pretty average classical close. People's ears are probably used to cinematic close with the mics actually in the piano.

That's probably it. I've never really liked classical recording norms anyway. Everything's too live. It's like the Steve Albini school of production.

Who is Steve Albini and what does he do?

He's a record producer, famous for his stripped-down, live, 'band in the your room' aesthetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah OK. Thank you for the clarification. I'll be sure check out those videos when I get back from work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was lucky enough to attend the concert for this last night. Really great event. Unfortunately JW wasn't able to make it - Gloria said he was "busy writing Star Wars 7" or something to that effect. Neither was Desplat, whose arriving Saturday for the Oscars. But all the other composers were there, and they very graciously met with all the fans.

We also saw the premiere of the (rough cut) of the video. It's about 30-40 minutes long, and a really cool look into the process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

After some back and forth, I finally decided to just download the Williams piece from iTunes -- not the other ones, and not the physical CD. Too expensive.

Well, I must admit that I find it totally underwhelming so far. Very abstract and not really much depth. It's a bit like that piano piece he wrote for Lang Lang. It's a bit frustrating to me that when he FINALLY decides to write for his main instrument, it's wildly avantgarde. I would have preferred something a bit more tonal. But that's me. Maybe it will grow on me after a few more listens. I'm glad it's been released, at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not much depth.

Not much depth?

Only on JWFan.

Only on JWFan can a member be all "music be in the eye of the beholder" AND "No depth? it clearly has depth! Only on JWFan!"

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually like Conversations (and many other the pieces on the album) more and more the more I listen to it. It takes a bit of time to hear the architecture and structure in Williams's piece in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feeling the urge to chime in: I found "Conversations" to be easily the strongest piece on the album, and the most profound, both structurally and musically. It's just really, really gorgeous, poetic piano writing, with a great sense of color. Loving the harmonic writing, and the subtle inflections of the "jazz history by twilight" the piece seems to offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a very "private" piece imho, almost introverted in nature, showing a side rarely heard of the composer. Williams seems more interested in exploring "ghostly" atmospheres and the percussive nature of the instrument than going for more traditional tonal routes. It's a four-part collection of wistful impressions, almost like a water-colored painting of abstract nature. It took me several listens to fully get into it, but it surely repaid me of the effort. In this sense, I think it's very closely related to "Three Pieces for Solo Cello" and "Rounds".

For the people complaining the lack of a more comfortable tonal language in the piece, I'd just say that Williams composed quite a lot of tonal, melody-centric piano music in his film repertoire, so there is quite a lot already in that department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the people complaining the lack of a more comfortable tonal language in the piece, I'd just say that Williams composed quite a lot of tonal, melody-centric piano music in his film repertoire, so there is quite a lot already in that department.

Sure. But the fact that his repertoire in this area is so skinny could explains why this is so comparatively un-engaging!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.