Youtube clips
#121
Posted 15 September 2006 - 06:55 PM
#122
Posted 15 September 2006 - 07:23 PM
Haha, well there should be less "artistic freedom" with comducting. Becuase sometimes...well I just don't think some of them are trying to communicate anything other than dynamics. Its annoying.
Aren't dynamics part of artistic freedom? Artistic freedom is why you become a conductor. The reason you like a piece in the first place is because of an interpretation of the conductor. You can like one one conductors intretation of a piece and not anothers. It brings freshness to a very tired repetoire.
Hovhaness
#123
Posted 15 September 2006 - 08:45 PM
Shows you how many people paid notice of the Youtube thread we had going...
Indeed.
- Marc, who'll move this there now.
Vrrrroooooommmmm!
#124
Posted 16 September 2006 - 06:41 AM
Haha, well there should be less "artistic freedom" with comducting. Becuase sometimes...well I just don't think some of them are trying to communicate anything other than dynamics. Its annoying.
Aren't dynamics part of artistic freedom? Artistic freedom is why you become a conductor. The reason you like a piece in the first place is because of an interpretation of the conductor. You can like one one conductors intretation of a piece and not anothers. It brings freshness to a very tired repetoire.
I understand what you mean comepletely and I agree that dynamics are a VERY important part, however I do not believe that clearly communicating the pulse and beat should suffer from it. Now maybe he did communicate that to some degree, but there are some that just...don't.
#125
Posted 16 September 2006 - 05:10 PM
#126
Posted 17 September 2006 - 12:05 AM
#127
Posted 17 September 2006 - 03:09 AM
I think JW would be a little disturbed if he saw that video.
#128
Posted 17 September 2006 - 03:46 AM
#129
Posted 20 September 2006 - 10:14 PM
#130
Posted 20 September 2006 - 11:38 PM
It is NOT all about keeping time and dynamics. That's what highschool directors, and a lot of "mediocre" conductors worry about.
The ones that transcend the medium, and become great don't neccessarily even show the beat. But they put forth the emotion or feeling they want out of the piece. I, personally, would much rather be conducting the mood of a piece than giving 1, 2, 3, 4. And most times, GOOD players would want that too. They can count. They don't need to be shown. You should only show the beats on intricate pieces such as the Rite of Spring or any very metrical pieces.
Naturally, a good conductor also shows cues...but meter is secondary. Really it is. I've seen some good conductors leaning one hand on the back rail of their podium with their baton moving wildly in the fashion they want the music played. I suggest watching Bernstein and seeing how much he really conducts the meter.
I mean, otherwise, without conductors' interpretations...what's the point of having over 100 versions of Beethoven's 9th? If all conductors just showed what was on the page with rhythm and dynamics...they'd all be carbon copies. That's why the greats all put in their own interpretations of lines.
#131
Posted 21 September 2006 - 01:39 PM
At least with him, most of the recordings and performances sound alike, unlike some conductors that play pieces that slow down or speed up unnecessarily and musicians don't all follow at the same time.
#132
Posted 21 September 2006 - 01:47 PM
#133
Posted 21 September 2006 - 04:13 PM
#134
Posted 21 September 2006 - 04:27 PM
Are you calling Williams a mediocre conductor?
Absolutely! I know I will probably get screamed at for this one...but he IS only a mediocre conductor. The guy is a performer, and a composer. He gets the job done with his conducting...he goes into the studio and records his music perfectly to the screen. In no way am I saying he can't get the job done.
However, if you watch him conduct for a whole piece up close...there are hardly any inflections in his conducting. He usually only conducts the beat. And in his old age, he is a bit "wobbly" with his pattern in the first place.
So before you freak out on me...YES I am a huge Williams fan. But is he an amazing conductor in the field of Bernstein and Toscannini? Nope. Not even close.
#135
Posted 21 September 2006 - 06:52 PM
#136
Posted 21 September 2006 - 07:28 PM
So what would Toscannini have done with the Superman March and the LSO? Bettered Williams' effort? By your estimations I'd love to hear it, even though its not possible.Are you calling Williams a mediocre conductor?
Absolutely! I know I will probably get screamed at for this one...but he IS only a mediocre conductor. The guy is a performer, and a composer. He gets the job done with his conducting...he goes into the studio and records his music perfectly to the screen. In no way am I saying he can't get the job done.
However, if you watch him conduct for a whole piece up close...there are hardly any inflections in his conducting. He usually only conducts the beat. And in his old age, he is a bit "wobbly" with his pattern in the first place.
So before you freak out on me...YES I am a huge Williams fan. But is he an amazing conductor in the field of Bernstein and Toscannini? Nope. Not even close.
#137
Posted 22 September 2006 - 02:13 AM
Again, please don't get me wrong. Williams does a good job for what he has to do.
By the way, I might note that JMan and I have both been spoiled by probably the best Wind Ensemble conductor in the country.
#138
Posted 22 September 2006 - 08:23 AM
"The Music Of John Williams" (Star Wars)
(Hhmm, I see a blurb attached that says The Austin Wind Symphony plays music strictly from the movies and television beerchug)
Heh, news clip-
Hollywood Bowl live performance (Don't know what year, hard to tell if that's JW way down there...)
Medley of Spielberg Movies set to film, good sound quality
http://www.youtube.c...related&search=
#139
Posted 22 September 2006 - 08:29 AM
#140
Posted 22 September 2006 - 09:25 PM
Undoubtedly the Superman March would be better. Absolutely undoubtedly. And yes, I too would love to hear it. I really would. I mean, there are some aspects of a March that just are prime by the time the orchestra even reads them. But the love theme, and other aspects of it...even if they are just subtle. They would be better.
Again, please don't get me wrong. Williams does a good job for what he has to do.
By the way, I might note that JMan and I have both been spoiled by probably the best Wind Ensemble conductor in the country.
Correctamundo.
#141
Posted 04 October 2006 - 04:15 PM
Yes its Biff from BTTF
#142
Posted 04 October 2006 - 04:58 PM
That was funny
#143
Posted 04 October 2006 - 05:10 PM
This guy may be talented after all.
#144
Posted 04 October 2006 - 05:24 PM
But seriously, I always thought his best performance was in the Wing Commander games. :-D
"Is that the guy from star wars?"
#145
Posted 04 October 2006 - 06:19 PM
#146
Posted 04 October 2006 - 08:24 PM
#147
Posted 05 October 2006 - 04:14 AM
#148
Posted 05 October 2006 - 04:18 AM
#149
Posted 05 October 2006 - 09:22 AM
#150
Posted 05 October 2006 - 09:35 AM
"Who you calling a Butthead, Butthead?"
Best BTTF. line. ever.
But "Get the hell out of my car old man!" is a close 2nd.
#151
Posted 05 October 2006 - 04:23 PM
#152
Posted 05 October 2006 - 04:54 PM
There is too strong association to other images in my head with the R.& J. Strauss etc. music.
Only the Ligeti stuff worked for me.
Other overrated scene is the Ride of the Walkyries in Apocalypse.Now. Bland.
#153
Posted 05 October 2006 - 05:17 PM
Alex North's opening to 2001:
http://www.youtube.c...related&search=
ttbk
With all due respect to Alex North, I don't think that works at all. It's nice music, but completely wrong for the film IMO.
#154
Posted 05 October 2006 - 06:12 PM
#155
Posted 05 October 2006 - 07:31 PM
I'll try and upload a version to YouTube, if I can figure out how.
#156
Posted 05 October 2006 - 07:37 PM
#157
Posted 05 October 2006 - 07:43 PM
With all due respect to Alex North, I don't think that works at all. It's nice music, but completely wrong for the film IMO.
It's far to busy and fanfaric for that opening, and it doesn't build as well to it's climax as the Strauss piece does.
Nice music, but it sounds like a 1950's film with Gladiators.
#158
Posted 05 October 2006 - 07:49 PM
Nice music, but it sounds like a 1950's film with Gladiators.
Strauss: And I looked at the film, and it was -- I don't even know how to describe how atrocious the music was.
It was like a 1950's Hercules movie.
And it wasn't because Alex's not a gifted writer, it's because he just doesn't have any knowledge of writing film scores. Real film scores like that. And it was like -- It was so corny. It was unbelievable.
ttbk
#159
Posted 05 October 2006 - 07:59 PM
#160
Posted 05 October 2006 - 08:07 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










