The man's clearly insane.Yes.
The Hobbit Film Trilogy Thread
#401
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:06 PM
- Patrick Bateman on the Maestro
#402
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:14 PM
#404
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:20 PM
Vrrrroooooommmmm!
#405
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:25 PM
#407
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:27 PM
With that reasonement, most Goldsmith scores should be crap
And they arent.
I'm confused.
#409
Posted 17 August 2007 - 02:08 PM
With that reasonement, most Goldsmith scores should be crap
And they arent.
I'm confused.
I didn't eveb bother to comprehend that statement.
Come on it was not that difficult.
You say the Prequels CGI does nothing for you, that you dont see it objectively because the movies are dull and awful in its sotry, characters, performances, etc.
With that reasonement, i say, (too) many movies that Goldsmith scored were crap, so the music should do nothing for you or you should have not interest in it, or dont think they are good. Yet, you enjoy those scores objectively, isolated from the movie.

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#410
Posted 17 August 2007 - 04:00 PM
I don't think anyone is saying ILM sucks, it's just that there's too much CGI and not enough real sets, actors etc etc etc.
#411
Posted 17 August 2007 - 05:40 PM
#412
Posted 17 August 2007 - 05:47 PM
#413
Posted 17 August 2007 - 05:48 PM
With that reasonement, i say, (too) many movies that Goldsmith scored were crap, so the music should do nothing for you or you should have not interest in it, or dont think they are good. Yet, you enjoy those scores objectively, isolated from the movie.
Your reasoning is peculiar, to say the least. If Goldsmith employed his music as poorly as CGI is employed in the Prequels, I bet you would hear complaints.
Of course, comparing CGI effects to music is something new to me.
#414
Posted 17 August 2007 - 06:09 PM
Most of the background work and "traditional" type of effects (spaceships, etc) work for me, much improved too in RotS since they got some plates from real life locations. It's the CG characters that lose me. The Clone Troopers in particular are...bad.
I've never understood quite why they can make a CG dinosaur so good it's totally indistinguishable from a mechanical one, yet whenever it comes to making something even remotely human-like, it just doesn't look realistic. I guess it could be that our impressions of how a dinosaur should move are based initially on CG, but even so, it just has that something.
And what I admire about PJ far more than Lucas, is he always seems to choose mini/big-atures over CH if it's possible. Having said that, I wasn't completely won over by some of the horses in the Minas Tirith siege.
#415
Posted 20 August 2007 - 01:42 PM
I've never understood quite why they can make a CG dinosaur so good it's totally indistinguishable from a mechanical one, yet whenever it comes to making something even remotely human-like, it just doesn't look realistic. I guess it could be that our impressions of how a dinosaur should move are based initially on CG, but even so, it just has that something.
The mecha-dinosaurs in JP are fairly noticeable from the CGI ones. The latter IMO being better....
Isnt davy jones human-like enough?
And what I admire about PJ far more than Lucas, is he always seems to choose mini/big-atures over CH if it's possible. Having said that, I wasn't completely won over by some of the horses in the Minas Tirith siege.
Sorry, most of those miniatures/models look like 'noticeable CGI'
And yes those CGI horses are bullshit.

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#416
Posted 20 August 2007 - 01:50 PM
Stop, before it's too late ... stop, me begs yer!
"You think they wear those tight-fitting clothes just so some other bride can say 'Gee your hips look succulent'? The good-looking ones know we're looking, they love us to be looking, and god bless 'em, they're carrying the rest of their sex!" - Al Bundy
#417
Posted 20 August 2007 - 04:08 PM
"I will not condone a course of action that will lead us to war"Oh no, I sense another PJ vs. Lucas coming.Stop, before it's too late ... stop, me begs yer!
A shame, since stormtroopers are so cool. Still, there are some awesome shots of clones, such as the ones who accompany Palpatine to Mustaphar.Most of the background work and "traditional" type of effects (spaceships, etc) work for me, much improved too in RotS since they got some plates from real life locations. It's the CG characters that lose me. The Clone Troopers in particular are...bad.
#418
Posted 20 August 2007 - 04:29 PM
"I will not condone a course of action that will lead us to war"Oh no, I sense another PJ vs. Lucas coming.Stop, before it's too late ... stop, me begs yer!
A shame, since stormtroopers are so cool. Still, there are some awesome shots of clones, such as the ones who accompany Palpatine to Mustaphar.Most of the background work and "traditional" type of effects (spaceships, etc) work for me, much improved too in RotS since they got some plates from real life locations. It's the CG characters that lose me. The Clone Troopers in particular are...bad.
Or the ones that talk to Bail Organa

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#419
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:17 PM
Peter Jackson to Produce The Hobbit and Sequel!
Source: New Line Cinema
December 18, 2007
Academy Award-winning filmmaker Peter Jackson; Harry Sloan, Chairman and CEO, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. (MGM); Bob Shaye and Michael Lynne, Co-Chairmen and Co-CEOs of New Line Cinema have jointly announced today that they have entered into the following series of agreements:
* MGM and New Line will co-finance and co-distribute two films, The Hobbit and a sequel to The Hobbit. New Line will distribute in North America and MGM will distribute internationally.
* Peter Jackson and Fran Walsh will serve as Executive Producers of two films based on The Hobbit. New Line will manage the production of the films, which will be shot simultaneously.
* Peter Jackson and New Line have settled all litigation relating to the "Lord of the Rings" (LOTR) Trilogy.
Said Peter Jackson, "I'm very pleased that we've been able to put our differences behind us, so that we may begin a new chapter with our old friends at New Line. 'The Lord of the Rings' is a legacy we proudly share with Bob and Michael, and together, we share that legacy with millions of loyal fans all over the world. We are delighted to continue our journey through Middle Earth. I also want to thank Harry Sloan and our new friends at MGM for helping us find the common ground necessary to continue that journey."
"Peter Jackson has proven himself as the filmmaker who can bring the extraordinary imagination of Tolkien to life and we full heartedly agree with the fans worldwide who know he should be making 'The Hobbit,'" said Sloan, MGM's Chairman and CEO. "Now that we are all in agreement on 'The Hobbit,' we can focus on assembling the production team that will capture this phenomenal tale on film."
Bob Shaye, New Line Co-Chairman and Co-CEO comments, "We are very pleased we have been able to resolve our differences, and that Peter and Fran will be actively and creatively involved with 'The Hobbit' movies. We know they will bring the same passion, care and talent to these films that they so ably accomplished with 'The Lord of the Rings' Trilogy."
"Peter is a visionary filmmaker, and he broke new ground with 'The Lord of the Rings,'" notes Michael Lynne, New Line Co-Chairman and Co-CEO. "We're delighted he's back for 'The Hobbit' films and that the Tolkien saga will continue with his imprint. We greatly appreciate the efforts of Harry Sloan, who has been instrumental in helping us reach our new accord."
The two "Hobbit" films – The Hobbit and its sequel – are scheduled to be shot simultaneously, with pre-production beginning as soon as possible. Principal photography is tentatively set for a 2009 start, with the intention of The Hobbit release slated for 2010 and its sequel the following year, in 2011.
The Oscar-winning, critically-acclaimed LOTR Trilogy grossed nearly $3 billion worldwide at the box-office. In 2003, "Return of the King" swept the Academy Awards, winning all of the eleven categories in which it was nominated, including Best Picture – the first ever Best Picture win for a fantasy film. The Trilogy's production was also unprecedented at the time.
For more information about "The Hobbit" films, please visit TheHobbitBlog.com.
#420
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:27 PM
If so this is great news.
#421
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:30 PM
#422
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:31 PM
#423
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:35 PM
Rest is irrelevant.
"You think they wear those tight-fitting clothes just so some other bride can say 'Gee your hips look succulent'? The good-looking ones know we're looking, they love us to be looking, and god bless 'em, they're carrying the rest of their sex!" - Al Bundy
#424
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:39 PM
Even if he doesn't direct, as executive produce he'll have a lot of say who gets it and have a big input on the entire production.
#425
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:43 PM
#426
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:45 PM
"You think they wear those tight-fitting clothes just so some other bride can say 'Gee your hips look succulent'? The good-looking ones know we're looking, they love us to be looking, and god bless 'em, they're carrying the rest of their sex!" - Al Bundy
#427
Posted 18 December 2007 - 06:58 PM
#428
Posted 18 December 2007 - 07:05 PM
Bummer......
#429
Posted 18 December 2007 - 07:26 PM
No, one film is the Hobbit, the other bridges the gap between Hobbit and LOTRDid I read correctly that The Hobbit will be broken up into two films? Given its length and simplicity, it really doesn't need to be. This is still cool, though.
#430
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:02 PM
I'm hoping and praying that PJ returns as director, though methinks that is wishful thinking, but still...
Other than Jackson? Steven Spielberg of course! Yeah right, like he would work for Jacko. Having said that, the Spiels seems perfectly happy to work for George Lucas, who's talents trail waaaay behind those of PJ and his writing team, so who knows...
#431
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:04 PM
#432
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:09 PM
#433
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:18 PM
#434
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:28 PM
#435
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:33 PM
#436
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:39 PM
#437
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:40 PM
Did I read correctly that The Hobbit will be broken up into two films? Given its length and simplicity, it really doesn't need to be. This is still cool, though.
They could easily pad the film by including Gandalf's conversation with Thorin in The Prancing Pony that leads to Thorin visiting Bilbo.
Also at one point in the story Gandalf dissapears to see to the Necromancer (Sauron). This could be integrated into the film, and the last meeting of the White Council.
#438
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:42 PM
#440
Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:56 PM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Upcoming Films, Movie Talk, Tolkien, The Hobbit, Peter Jackson, 2012 Films, 2013 Films, 2014 Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Trek Into Darkness SPOILERS ALLOWED Discussion ThreadStarted by Jason LeBlanc, 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars stand-alone films confirmedStarted by Once, 06 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
New Kubrick DocumentaryStarted by Alexcremers, 04 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014 film directed by Bryan Singer)Started by Matt C, 27 Jan 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars Episode VII (Directed by JJ Abrams)Started by crocodile, 24 Jan 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










