What's The Last Book You Read?
#841
Posted 30 July 2012 - 11:09 AM
Personally, I loose track of the narration with an audiobook. It ends up tiring me, or going too fast, or too slow (when I read, my rythm and speed vary accordingly to the story). Plus I like listening to some music when I read.
And if it's in English I find it a bit harder to follow than in written form, as I'm not a native speaker. If it's a particularly complex text I need to read it at my own speed going back and forth.
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#842
Posted 30 July 2012 - 11:19 AM
~Renovia
Ah music, a magic beyond all we do here. ~ Albus Dumbledore
#843
Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:33 PM
#844
Posted 30 July 2012 - 12:35 PM
Has no one listened to Jim Dale!?!?!? He's incredible.
I read the first three Harry Potters in paperback, but completed the series by listening to his narration in the audiobooks. They were superb.
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#845
Posted 30 July 2012 - 01:53 PM
because there is something magical about being read too.
why, they are wonderful.
I hate audiobooks.
I love them. They are great for books you simply cannot get into.
I wonder if audiobooks is an American thing. I mean, I don't know anyone here in Europe who listen to audiobooks (even children).
Audiobooks is something I don't understand, personally. I can read. Why would I let anyone read a book for me?
Audiobooks are great for long trips. I don't know how many of you Europeans actually drive for hours upon end but some of us do over here. When I drive to see my mom I can usually listen to about 1/3 of an audio book, 6 hours or so. I get tired of music. An audio book forces me to concentrate and I get less tired on long drives.
Wojo is correct, the Jim Dale read Harry Potter novels are superb.
"You're not John Conner, I saw you die, said Kyle". "I was only injured, replied John". "No, your injuries were too severe, you died. Look at you, where are your injuries? You're, you're a Terminator." "Kyle, its still me, yes my body was beyond repair, but my essence is here." He points to his head. "No John". Kyle raised his pulse rifle and aimed it at John but before he could fire, John fired first. Knocked to the ground Kyle looked up at the Terminator in the form of the man he once idolized. All hope was lost. "If you kill me how will you ever be born?" "Thats a good question Kyle, all this time we've focus on Sarah, on John, when had we known the it was you we should have targeted all along." John pointed his rifle at Kyle's face. "The resistance is finished, the battle is won. We the machines are the victors, salvation is ours." Kyle never heard the second shot.
#846
Posted 30 July 2012 - 02:01 PM
For a book that more or less covers the same events as Ender's Game, there's almost no overlap or redundant passages at all. Bean's story is a captivating one, I was hooked from the very first few pages. It is very interesting to read this story from the eyes of a super-super-genius surrounded by super-geniuses. It's interesting how much he figures out on his own and how it never feels forced. The only problem I had with the book was the end. Everything was paced beautifully up through when Ender leaves for Command School, then all of a sudden the book becomes rushed and flies past many parts only referring to them in a minor way. You wait the whole book to see what happens when Bean gets to lead Dragon Army, then it gets there and all his battles are just talked about after the fact. Disappointing. Overall though, a terrific book. I'm almost afraid to continue on with the shadow series, because I have a feeling they won't live up to this at all. I am more interested in Bugger stories than civil war on earth and political procedings
#847
Posted 09 September 2012 - 01:57 PM
This is the second book of his. He has one more in the 'fratire' genre. These books are simply stories of him drinking and hooking up. It's like 50 Shades of Grey for guys.
#848
Posted 09 September 2012 - 03:28 PM
Brutal narration about the end of the Andalusians at the hands of the Castilian conquerers, right before they turned to America to continue the same thing. The pace of the narration is slightly awkward at times but I didn't care. It's more worried about getting you in the head of the people and the ambience of the Granada of the time than in developing a complicated story, which I appreciate given the complexity of this part of our history.
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#849
Posted 09 September 2012 - 05:38 PM
#850
Posted 09 September 2012 - 05:49 PM
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#851
Posted 09 September 2012 - 07:48 PM
#852
Posted 11 September 2012 - 01:17 AM
#853
Posted 13 September 2012 - 08:15 PM
Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree by Tariq Ali.
Brutal narration about the end of the Andalusians at the hands of the Castilian conquerers, right before they turned to America to continue the same thing.
???
good riddance! Andalusians were the conquerors here...
It's not the same as in america.
BTW, why are we always the badguys?

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#854
Posted 13 September 2012 - 08:30 PM
Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree by Tariq Ali.
Brutal narration about the end of the Andalusians at the hands of the Castilian conquerers, right before they turned to America to continue the same thing.
???
good riddance! Andalusians were the conquerors here...
When the Imazighen / Arabic army entered the Peninsula they weren't Andalusis. They became so later through cultural synchretism. First, the southern romance didn't stop being spoken, and it was written in the Arabic alphabet. The population largely adopted a form of Maghrebi Arabic that differenciated itself from the African forms in several ways, including influence by romance languages, thus the appearance of Andalusi Arabic (presumably the word Andalus comes from a Gothic word for the Baetica). Most of the population were the previously existing Latins being included within the Islamic/Arabic world. In my opinion the invader armies were too small to destroy and repopulate the land, and it was too fast through a very large territory.
Of course we can indeed say the Andalusi armies caused destruction in the North, once we have the Andalusis themselves. And there came a lot more of Imazighen/Bereber from Northern Africa, I think.
BTW, why are we always the badguys?
We aren't. The bad guys are religion, ignorance, ideas of cultural superiority or inferiority, conviction of revelation and absolute knowledge, destruction of languages and literature...
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#855
Posted 13 September 2012 - 08:40 PM
neither the castillians or aragonese 'reconquered' any territories... since they didnt exist when those were lost...
i suppose it all ends viewed from the point of view of islam vs catholicism

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#856
Posted 14 September 2012 - 07:39 PM
The bad guys are religion, ignorance, ideas of cultural superiority or inferiority, conviction of revelation and absolute knowledge, destruction of languages and literature...
Don't forget smallpox blankets.
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#857
Posted 14 September 2012 - 08:13 PM
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#858
Posted 21 September 2012 - 06:58 PM
I want to get the new 2312 by the same guy.
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#859
Posted 27 September 2012 - 02:37 PM
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#860
Posted 27 September 2012 - 03:02 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#861
Posted 29 September 2012 - 11:41 AM
It was great. An excellent story, told in a way only Tolkien can.
After that I began reading "Dangerous Skies" by Suzanne Fisher Staples, but I can't read any further. I don't like her style of writing. It's too childish for me.
#862
Posted 30 September 2012 - 09:49 PM
Anyone who liked the movie and hasn't read it, I recommend it. Usually its either a case of, " oh, the book was better" or " eh, it was a better film than it was book". In this case its " The movie was great and this is even more so"
#863
Posted 30 September 2012 - 11:37 PM
Music Muse Reviews: "Escape From Tomorrow by Abel Korzeniowski
#864
Posted 01 October 2012 - 02:44 PM
I never read the book, but I thought this was one of those cases where the movie was a lot better.
It certainly is one of those cases. Normally you have to read the book before you can say the movie is better, and forgive me for going all Joey-meets-Alexcremers on you, but allow me to just say it for you.
...a copy of THE PRINCESS BRIDE.
Anyone who liked the movie and hasn't read it, I recommend it. Usually its either a case of, " oh, the book was better" or " eh, it was a better film than it was book". In this case its " The movie was great and this is even more so"
Really? The book's primary gimmick is that it functions as an abridgment of a complete book that doesn't exist anymore, but which everybody famous knows and quotes from. That joke got old the first few times that it was told, but nobody seems to have told Goldman/Morgernstern/whatever his name was that information. The book was too pretentious to be funny or even enjoyable. The only really noteworthy to say about the book is how such an excellent movie could be made from such a godawful book. I hate this book so much with every fiber in my body that I pretend the Berlin scene in The Last Crusade was filmed using copies of Goldman's book.
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#865
Posted 02 October 2012 - 04:13 AM
I need to finish my Hemingway.
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#866
Posted 04 October 2012 - 06:05 PM
I never read the book, but I thought this was one of those cases where the movie was a lot better.
It certainly is one of those cases. Normally you have to read the book before you can say the movie is better, and forgive me for going all Joey-meets-Alexcremers on you, but allow me to just say it for you....a copy of THE PRINCESS BRIDE.
Anyone who liked the movie and hasn't read it, I recommend it. Usually its either a case of, " oh, the book was better" or " eh, it was a better film than it was book". In this case its " The movie was great and this is even more so"
Really? The book's primary gimmick is that it functions as an abridgment of a complete book that doesn't exist anymore, but which everybody famous knows and quotes from. That joke got old the first few times that it was told, but nobody seems to have told Goldman/Morgernstern/whatever his name was that information. The book was too pretentious to be funny or even enjoyable. The only really noteworthy to say about the book is how such an excellent movie could be made from such a godawful book. I hate this book so much with every fiber in my body that I pretend the Berlin scene in The Last Crusade was filmed using copies of Goldman's book.
Regarding Goldman's book. First time I read it, I agreed with what you are saying. I still do. I think the first time I didn't get any further than the first few chapters. This time, however, I largely ignored Goldman's " editor's notes" throughout and was able to tolerate it more. I do agree its shocking the movie is as good as it is when compared to the source material. At least the memorable lines from the film are in the book as well. One of the best being
" you keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it does"
#867
Posted 04 October 2012 - 06:09 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#868
Posted 04 October 2012 - 07:12 PM
A history of Saturday Night Live told by those involved. The book is ten years old, they should do an update.
#869
Posted 04 October 2012 - 08:41 PM
I never read the book, but I thought this was one of those cases where the movie was a lot better.
It certainly is one of those cases. Normally you have to read the book before you can say the movie is better, and forgive me for going all Joey-meets-Alexcremers on you, but allow me to just say it for you.
Maybe I will someday. And what I said was never my personal opinion of the book, I just read in some other thread that it was supposedly better and pointed it out. Guess I should have phrased it differently.
Ahh...the woes of internet communication.
Music Muse Reviews: "Escape From Tomorrow by Abel Korzeniowski
#870
Posted 05 October 2012 - 03:28 AM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#871
Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:03 PM
Fair enough. I rather enjoyed Moby Dick when I skipped all the chapters that explain how to kill whales.
Including the one that explains, in details, why a whale is a fish and not a mammal?
#872
Posted 05 October 2012 - 06:15 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#873
Posted 06 October 2012 - 12:34 AM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#874
Posted 12 November 2012 - 04:44 PM
Typical political book but he is funny enough to make it readable.
#875
Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:54 PM
Why? I don't know. Just suddenly had the urge to read this one again.
#877
Posted 16 November 2012 - 01:55 PM
#878
Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:49 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#879
Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:16 PM
#880
Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:38 PM
Certain books are free to rent. Prime has had a library aspect to it for a little while now. You can check out one book per month and take as long as you want to read it. You do need a Kindle though.
Otherwise they're $7 a pop.
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










