Headphones
#361
Posted 02 November 2011 - 11:32 PM
I think the MDR V-7506 headphones you posted earlier Jay are ones that Joe (Data) has. I would recommend those.
#362
Posted 03 November 2011 - 09:15 AM
I dunno ..bose?
Briefly tried the Triports..urgh
Well, I never heard the Triports but those are not the AE2, which apparently has a different sound signature. I simply wanted to point out that no other headphones sit as comfortable as the AE2 and that the sound (at the Bose stand) was pretty good. Very balanced except for the trickery with the bass region, which I already mentioned. For half the price I would buy them precisely for the qualities they offer (extreme comfort, sound isolation and a pretty well balanced sound except for the bass thingy). I let my ears be the judge and not their bad reputation with audiophiles. Heck, i think I'm an audiophile compared to most people here. Of course, I never tested the AE2 in a different situation (never on my own equipment, for example) so maybe Bose 'tunes' the sound at the Bose stand so they come across as 'pretty good' and enjoyable. The Beats, now those are hideous! Their bass is so over-the-top that it simply overpowers everything else. Not as comfortable either, BTW.
Alex
#363
Posted 03 November 2011 - 05:22 PM
I heard a pair of Bose once in Best Buy. At the time I had my big Sony MDR V-6 headphones with me and tested them against those. The Bose honestly sounded like shit in comparison. I don't know if I could ever justify spending a lot of money for a pair of Bose headphones.
I think the MDR V-7506 headphones you posted earlier Jay are ones that Joe (Data) has. I would recommend those.
Yeah, I have the MDR-7506 headphones, and they're absolutely fantastic. Very durable, very comfortable, and - most importantly - they sound great. Very clear, accurate sound. Great for both editing and listening. Just know that the pads will probably wear out after a while, and you'll want to replace them. Sony sells replacements, or you can do what I did and buy Beyerdynamic pads instead. After getting accustomed to the way these feel and sound with the different pads, I think I like them even better this way.
And yes, as Stefan put it, Bose is the Satan of the audiophile world. I wouldn't quite consider myself an honest-to-goodness audiophile, but I know that those who do qualify are universally disgusted with Bose. Slick marketing and not much else. I haven't been impressed with what little I've heard.
#364
Posted 03 November 2011 - 06:09 PM
Beats and anything else by Monster are ridiculously overpriced. My discount cuts their cost in half; with the QuietComforts, I get around $80 off.
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#365
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:17 PM
I'm not very sensitive to slight pitch changes( like in the ToD Concord c.d.), but I'm sensitive to slight tonal changes and ambiance alteration.
#366
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:32 PM
Noise cancellation = distortion in the music(or impression that something is "missing" ). I can hear it
I've never noticed distortion in the music when listening to my V-Moda Octave earbuds.
#367
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:38 PM
I'm talking active noise cancellation with a circuit you turn on (battery operated)
#368
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:42 PM
And yes, as Stefan put it, Bose is the Satan of the audiophile world. I wouldn't quite consider myself an honest-to-goodness audiophile, but I know that those who do qualify are universally disgusted with Bose. Slick marketing and not much else. I haven't been impressed with what little I've heard.
Of course, but some audiophiles say that's a typical overreaction like some smartphone-philes like to bitch on Apple. It's like they believe that by in doing so it gives them some sort of credibility. Some people never heard them but simply ape the bitching. Most people don't have good ears. That's why the beats are the most popular headphones on the market.
#369
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:48 PM
#370
Posted 03 November 2011 - 07:54 PM
#371
Posted 03 November 2011 - 08:08 PM
Of course, but some audiophiles say that's a typical overreaction like some smartphone-philes like to bitch on Apple. It's like they believe that by in doing so it gives them some sort of credibility. Some people never heard them but simply ape the bitching. Most people don't have good ears. That's why the beats are the most popular headphones on the market.
Naturally. Whenever a group of people start complaining enough about something (especially something that's popular), there will be folks who jump on the bandwagon. Doesn't invalidate the original genuine complaints, though. (Again, I can't offer too much in the way of personal opinions here - I haven't used Bose products very often.)
I will say that comfort, noise-canceling ability, and stylish looks are far less important to me than the actual sound the headphones produce. I'd rather listen to pristine sound in a quiet room while looking like a dork and feeling a little pressure around my ears than comfortably listen to crappy sound in noisy environments while looking cool.
#372
Posted 03 November 2011 - 08:47 PM
Audiophiles don't listen to PC speakers, KM.
I don't. I'm always on headphones
#373
Posted 05 November 2011 - 01:19 AM
These 300$ headphones are good, but about the same as my in-ear Shure SE215 and Grado SR-60's
http://www.futuresho...5efec8cd87ben02
There was some "Adidas-Sennheisers" that sounded a bit tinny
And the Bose sounded REALLY like crap with my music (strangely on the Bose Demo stand with the pre-programmed music they sound good, but I think the music is heavily equalized to hide all the flaws)
#374
Posted 05 November 2011 - 06:41 AM
Alex
#375
Posted 05 November 2011 - 07:31 AM
I'd have to listen to the 60i's to see if they really fixed that
#376
Posted 05 November 2011 - 09:03 AM

Beats Mixr

Guetta says that these are the best headphones he has ever heard, no matter what music or how loud he plays, there's no distortion.
What are we waiting for?!
Alex
#378
Posted 05 November 2011 - 03:37 PM
The concept is simple: replaygain once scans each track in your collection and then stores its peak amplitude in an ID3 tag, so the player can immediately determine the required normalisation factor without re-scanning the file. The player then does normalisation on the fly when playing the file. There are three modes: Off (no normalisation), track (each track is fully normalised) and album (all tracks from the same album are normalised by the same factor).
I thought Bose was the Audiophile version of Satan?
From what I've read, they're the non-audiophile version of Satan.
#379
Posted 05 November 2011 - 09:51 PM
That's an automatic elimination in my books
#380
Posted 06 November 2011 - 04:47 AM
#381
Posted 06 November 2011 - 06:36 AM
Maybe it's not too noticeable on pop music and electronic music because the reference of how the instrument should sound like is not as set in your mind.
I don't get that with Grado SR-60. Even if the bass is not as deep as I'd like and the higher end models have better "room dynamics" ,nothing is missing in the basic sound
I tried the Bowers and Wilkins P5's again with several tracks I know well. They're ok but not amazing. Not worth 300$ .Switching back and forth, my in ear Shure SE215 were better
#382
Posted 06 November 2011 - 06:00 PM
#383
Posted 06 November 2011 - 07:16 PM
#384
Posted 06 November 2011 - 10:54 PM
Data's right they sound really good with balanced sound and no obvious coloration. They edge slightly in musical detail ( but not by much) the Grado SR-60. But the highs on the Sony 7506 /V6 are a bit ear piercing I found, and by reading some stuff I wonder if the treble might not be too fatiguing for long listening sessions:
http://www.anythingb...ead.php?t=63814
http://www.head-fi.o...-a-closed-grado
#385
Posted 07 November 2011 - 06:24 AM
#386
Posted 07 November 2011 - 06:33 AM
I've also concluded that all the 300$ models I was looking at need an amp to sound good (Sennheiser 558's and 598's for example)
#387
Posted 08 November 2011 - 07:39 AM
If they pass my second listening test I will purchase a pair
#388
Posted 08 November 2011 - 01:00 PM
Sony MDR7506
EDIT: Amazon.CA link for you http://www.amazon.ca...F4E/jwfancom-20
#389
Posted 08 November 2011 - 05:31 PM
#390
Posted 08 November 2011 - 06:35 PM
#391
Posted 08 November 2011 - 06:41 PM
#393
Posted 08 November 2011 - 07:29 PM
#396
Posted 08 November 2011 - 09:45 PM
1sr impressions on my computer
Louder at equal volume than Grado-SR60 , definitely no amp needed . They are even loud enough on an ipod nano
Seem to sound perfect at all frequencies with the EQ at FLAT (they aren't that bright to me as some people on forums have said) My Grados require that I put the itunes EQ on Bass Boost (either way the Sony's sound a bit better and fuller) . Just want to make it clear the Grados aren't a clear loser though.
1 cord design is less tangle, but I don't like that it's coiled because it adds weight
Seem very solidly built
I'll listen more .I tend to notice the negatives on headphones after a few days like if there's something annoying in the sound when listening to them a lot
it could possibly be something I'd want to keep for years with no further upgrades.
#398
Posted 08 November 2011 - 11:31 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#399
Posted 08 November 2011 - 11:47 PM
#400
Posted 09 November 2011 - 01:49 AM
It's more like Sony7506 with flat EQ vs Grado SR-60's with Bass Boost EQ. The Sony 7506 do have an initial wow factor but the winner is not as clear cut as I initially thought
In favor of the Grados the highs are less fatiguing to listen to , the mids are a bit warmer (lush string passages sound nicer) and the sound is slightly more spacious due to the open air design.
All the other advantages go to the Sony's for now. I'll let them play all night to break them in a bit.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











