Headphones
#41
Posted 05 January 2007 - 09:55 PM
#42
Posted 03 July 2007 - 04:21 AM
Listening to my ipod has just gotten a lot more interesting.Funny it took me a year of glancing at them in the store before trying them out,but they are 100$
they are also very confortable and fit very securely in the ear

K.M.
#43
Posted 03 July 2007 - 05:03 AM
#44
Posted 03 July 2007 - 12:42 PM

Spatials aren't that great, but the bass just has to be heard
#45
Posted 03 July 2007 - 12:45 PM
I got some Shure E2-C ear canal phones today.I was sceptical but they sound amazing,identical to my "big" Grado SR60 I use for home listening(not sure how it's possible but it is)
Listening to my ipod has just gotten a lot more interesting.Funny it took me a year of glancing at them in the store before trying them out,but they are 100$
they are also very confortable and fit very securely in the ear
K.M.
Looks somewhat sexual.
#46
Posted 03 July 2007 - 02:08 PM
#47
Posted 03 July 2007 - 02:28 PM
The only minor "drawback", if I can call it so, of my headphones is their high impendance (600 ohms). That is of course not such a problem until you try them with your, say, portable CD or MP3 player.

Human aggression is instinctual. Humans have not evolved any ritualised aggression-inhibiting mechanisms to ensure the survival of the species. For this reason man is considered a very dangerous animal.
-- Konrad Lorenz
#48
Posted 04 July 2007 - 04:01 AM
#49
Posted 04 July 2007 - 08:21 PM
I have mixed feelings about them, they sounded great with songs (Rock, R &B, pop etc etc.) but with film scores there's something missing.
#51
Posted 04 July 2007 - 08:28 PM
#53
Posted 04 July 2007 - 09:37 PM
also one of my friends had a pair,I briefly tried them and kinda went "ewww"
#54
Posted 04 July 2007 - 11:18 PM
I got a pair of Bose Triport headphones for Father's Day.
I have mixed feelings about them, they sounded great with songs (Rock, R &B, pop etc etc.) but with film scores there's something missing.
That's EXACTLY how I feel with the ones I showed above. Amazing bass and ooomph makes normal songs great, but at least at first, scores just sounded a bit distant and not very 'surrounding'. I actually considered trying to find a pair of my old ones, but they're not made any more and I've gotten used to the sound of these more.
#55
Posted 04 July 2007 - 11:24 PM
K.M.
#56
Posted 06 July 2007 - 02:08 AM
From what I read,Bose Triport headphones accentuates the bass and drown out all the middle frequencies.
That's about what I've heard about pretty much anything Bose produces.
#57
Posted 06 July 2007 - 08:38 AM
K.M.
#58
Posted 07 July 2007 - 12:21 AM
Luckily, I've also hooked the PC up to the Arcam (digitally), so at night I listen with headphones connected to that one.
#59
Posted 14 July 2007 - 10:34 AM
From what I read,Bose Triport headphones accentuates the bass and drown out all the middle frequencies.Not good for orchestral soundtracks in which you need a very neutral sound.
also one of my friends had a pair,I briefly tried them and kinda went "ewww"
Some Williams CDs also have that "Bose" sound. Some people refer to it as "silky". Imagine playing Jurassic Park on a Bose set!
#60
Posted 14 July 2007 - 10:56 AM
Whereas transparent studio phones , you only hear what is there.
I recently bought a pair of AKG k55 headphones, which are in between consumer and studio quality. It's interesting to compare them to other headphones I have. They colour the sound in a way which makes the music sound better in some ways, but if you want to hear it in a pure way, you have to use an audiophile orientated product.
#61
Posted 16 July 2007 - 11:01 AM
#63
Posted 16 July 2007 - 11:41 AM
#65
Posted 16 July 2007 - 12:31 PM
For Jurassic Park, I suspect they used an Aphex Aural Exciter or some equivalent to achieve this particular sound. The thing is, with really good orchestral recordings, you don't hear or notice any "tuning" or enhancements. Perhaps it's precisely the unnaturalness that appeals to you.
Alex
#67
Posted 16 July 2007 - 08:45 PM
It is also no matter what type of brand it is to check the specification of the headphones such as the output hertz or the watts it has for the quality of sound you're looking for.
Whaa?
#70
Posted 22 July 2007 - 04:44 AM
#71
Posted 05 January 2009 - 07:41 PM
I have always just been content with the basic earphones that you can pick up at Dollar Tree or Walmart (as I mentioned a couple posts back).
But I recently decided to just go ahead and give a pair of good in-ear buds a try to see what all the fuss is about. So, I picked up a pair of Skullcandy "ink'd" buds.
Wow.
Just, wow.
Who would have guessed there could be so much difference in the sound quality?
And these are still just relatively cheap ones ($17).
#73
Posted 05 January 2009 - 09:28 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#74
Posted 05 January 2009 - 09:59 PM
http://www.bhphotovi...r...0&Go=submit
I've tried virtually every pair of earbuds and these have been the best ones.
For regular headphones I have a pair Sony MDR-V600's which are great.
#75
Posted 05 January 2009 - 10:07 PM
Might have to try those next then. They're not a whole lot more money than the ones I just got.I've got a pair of these earbuds that Erik Woods recommended me and they're great! Seriously the best pair of earbuds I've owned.
http://www.bhphotovi...r...0&Go=submit
I've tried virtually every pair of earbuds and these have been the best ones.
For regular headphones I have a pair Sony MDR-V600's which are great.
#76
Posted 05 January 2009 - 10:08 PM
That being said I was pleasantly surprised by a pair of Panasonic headphones that I bought in the sub $40 range. the Panasonic RP-HTX7 blew me away at the price... May not be Grado's but for the price I wouldn't trade these ones.
JMoss
#77
Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:18 PM
#78
Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:33 PM
I use a pair of Sennheiser HD 555 headphones for listening at home. Very happy with those as well.
Vrrrroooooommmmm!
#79
Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:39 PM
#80
Posted 05 January 2009 - 11:45 PM
EDIT:
Ah, here's one:

Photo by Peio.
Vrrrroooooommmmm!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










