#161
Posted 15 May 2009 - 10:53 PM
#162
Posted 16 May 2009 - 12:57 AM
I repeat, I (hopefully) won't start buying Blu before it's sufficiently cracked to play a disc directly on my system without buying crippling hardware or paying for player software that doesn't do what I want. Once I can play Blu discs like I can play DVDs now, I'll be happy to give them money for their content. As long as they force me to buy crippled hardware which does nothing but prevent me from doing these things, I won't.
#163
Posted 16 May 2009 - 08:00 AM
I remember reading that somewhere. It's already down to $400 for the 80GB. Would they go down to $300? That'd only put it up a little more than the 360. Doesn't really matter since the 360 already costs more in total than the PS3.PS3 is supposed to come down by an unspecified amount in June, I'll pick one up then.
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#164
Posted 16 May 2009 - 08:04 AM
#165
Posted 18 May 2009 - 05:39 PM
#166
Posted 14 June 2009 - 09:41 PM
Analogue Blu-ray output being phased out
More details & further restrictions
No, this is not exaggerated or unrealistic:
#167
Posted 14 June 2009 - 11:06 PM
Maybe I'm too cynical these days, but whenever something new comes out, you can guarantee that the maker will have exhaustively thought of everything a user could possibly to do deprive them of more profit, and devise mechanisms against it. If those mechanisms get in the way of stuff you're allowed to to under fair use? Tough.
And I just remembered, I was looking at Amazon UK's mp3 downloading thing, and decided to randomly e-mail them about one part of their T&C - that once you've downloaded a track/album, that's it - if your HDD crashes or anything like that, you can't just download it again. I buy from 2 other places that don't have that restriction, so I thought it would be interesting to hear what their excuse is, given that there's zero technical grounds.
#168
Posted 15 June 2009 - 02:16 PM
#169
Posted 15 June 2009 - 04:13 PM
#170
Posted 15 June 2009 - 06:21 PM
#171
Posted 15 June 2009 - 06:47 PM
And that isn't just because I have no means to play them.
#172
Posted 15 June 2009 - 06:52 PM
#173
Posted 15 June 2009 - 07:30 PM
#174
Posted 21 June 2009 - 01:04 PM
#175
Posted 21 June 2009 - 01:50 PM
It's nice I can now watch my European Alias and Fawlty Towers DVDs in bed on my PS3. I still don't accept why I'm not allowed to watch my US Friends DVDs there.
#176
Posted 21 June 2009 - 04:07 PM
A stupid question probably: can you play R1 DVDs with a (Region B) Blu-Ray player in Europe?
Not unless it's specifically region-free.
Just bought GHOSTBUSTERS on BD. Looking forward to checking it out.
#177
Posted 21 June 2009 - 07:42 PM
Last year Toho went back and remastered all the original negatives in HD.
#178
Posted 21 June 2009 - 09:13 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#179
Posted 21 June 2009 - 10:44 PM
So a Region B Blu player or a PS3 from Europe still don't play regular Region 1 DVDs? Argh!A stupid question probably: can you play R1 DVDs with a (Region B) Blu-Ray player in Europe?
Not unless it's specifically region-free.
Just bought GHOSTBUSTERS on BD. Looking forward to checking it out.
#180
Posted 21 June 2009 - 11:18 PM
Apparently, HD-DVD was codefree. And that may have played a part in its downfall.
#181
Posted 22 June 2009 - 12:11 AM
#182
Posted 22 June 2009 - 12:25 AM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#183
Posted 22 June 2009 - 12:48 AM
And seriously, how many Blu-rays have made full use of the capabilities of the format? (The advantages are, after all, mostly a matter of capacity...)
But I don't want to resurrect the HD-DVD - BR war here; I've never even cared much myself which one of them won (apart from its impact on those two issues...).
#184
Posted 22 June 2009 - 04:29 AM
Crap, now Toho is releasing the remastered Godzilla films (as well as other sci-fi/ kaiju films) on Blu-ray.
Last year Toho went back and remastered all the original negatives in HD.
Awesome!
#185
Posted 22 June 2009 - 11:42 AM
A stupid question probably: can you play R1 DVDs with a (Region B) Blu-Ray player in Europe?
Not unless it's specifically region-free.
Well, that sucks a fantastic amount of fat hairy donkey balls.
Guess I won't be going Blu just yet.
Vrrrroooooommmmm!
#186
Posted 22 June 2009 - 09:12 PM
You wanted a vastly inferior format to win just because it was region free?
What's so vastly superiour about Blu? (I honestly don't recall the differences in detail)
#187
Posted 22 June 2009 - 10:20 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#188
Posted 22 June 2009 - 11:04 PM
Which is why many BRs are barebones, having dropped the regular DVD extras... They're just screw-ups in Hollywood, all of them. Why do I have to check on the internet, with every DVD I want to buy, whether there's anything wrong with it (aspect ratio, scenes missing, extras missing, wrong cuts, censored, transfer, etc.). Sorry, rant over. Move along, move along.Blu-ray has a much greater amount of disc space
#189
Posted 22 June 2009 - 11:11 PM
Blu-ray has a much greater amount of disc space, which can be useful for a lot of things. HD-DVD wasn't even full HD, it's video output only went up to 1080i.
Wasn't it something like 50GB vs 40GB? That's significant but not that vast. 1080i vs 1080p is more important.
Aside from HD, 24fps playback is my main reason for REALLY wanting Blu. But the conditions aren't right yet.
#190
Posted 23 June 2009 - 12:33 AM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#191
Posted 23 June 2009 - 04:05 PM
HD-DVD wasn't even full HD, it's video output only went up to 1080i.
Wasn't that only for the first generation of players?
#192
Posted 23 June 2009 - 04:19 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#193
Posted 25 June 2009 - 04:09 PM
#194
Posted 28 June 2009 - 01:45 PM
Was there more than one generation? It died pretty quickly.
Yes there were, and I may be wrong, but I think only the first player had the 1080i limitation. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.
#195
Posted 29 June 2009 - 05:26 PM
Talking about HD quality, your chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
(Pssst ... LCD)
Alex
#197
Posted 02 July 2009 - 12:47 PM
#198
Posted 05 July 2009 - 01:03 PM
#200
Posted 09 July 2009 - 04:12 PM
I remember years ago before BluRay was released, people thought the "Blue Laser Disc" technology would be great because the disc's capacity was so large, you could fit SIX movies on it! They'd be able to fit the entire Star Wars saga on one disc!
I remember that concept as well Drax.
HD DVD knew it wouldn't survive against Blu-Ray. As stated by other members why Blu-Ray was better.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Movie Talk
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Trek Into Darkness SPOILERS ALLOWED Discussion ThreadStarted by Jason LeBlanc, 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars stand-alone films confirmedStarted by Once, 06 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
New Kubrick DocumentaryStarted by Alexcremers, 04 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014 film directed by Bryan Singer)Started by Matt C, 27 Jan 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars Episode VII (Directed by JJ Abrams)Started by crocodile, 24 Jan 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











