4359 replies to this topic

[Joey]

since you insist go to www.darkhorizons.com or

www.aintitcoolnews.com http://www.comingsoo...ms.php?id=77778 http://www.cnn.com/2...ref=rss_showbiz
http://www.usmagazin...classic-2012273

if I say it it's true, but I wasn't talking about her selection as much as I was her age.

do you really want to see menstral blood running down the leg of a 15 year old simulating her very first period ever? followed by the teasing strains of other bitchy teenage girls yelling plug it up, plug it up. At least Sissy Spacek was over 20. DePalma's film was very shocking in 1976. Virtually ground breaking in that respect.
Nothing could prepare you for that opening sequence and once it was shown it made statement that said this director can go anywhere with this. Now the thought of a 15 year old is near pornographic.

[Chaac]

Let's see. I haven't read Carry and I don't know what happens in it, but I've read it happens in high school. Personally, I don't want to see older people playing people in high school ever again (my main complaint for The Amazing Spider-Man trailers). So I think I'm fine with this.

Now, reading your comment, I don't see why that should be seen as near pornographic, given that it involves a 15 year old and it's supposed to be a horror story. Only if I were attracted to the situation despicted or if it was clearly intended to stimulate sexual excitement I would consider it pornographic myself.

Could it be disturbing? Maybe. Would that be wrong? In a horror story? I don't think so. It'd be like saying that it would be wrong to generate excitement in an action film by hanging Tom Cruise out of the Burj Khalifa.

Besides, special effects can be used to simulate what you don't want to see but it looks the same anyway.

[Joey]

then you have alot of films and tv shows to object too. your objections are rather anal.

In this case the character is several years younger, based on your arguments it probably should go both ways.

[Chaac]

then you have alot of films and tv shows to object too. your objections are rather anal.

In this case the character is several years younger, based on your arguments it probably should go both ways.

I'm actually aware of my objections being anal.

If the character is supposed to be several years younger that might affect the kid. Also they'd need the consention of the girl and the parents to despict such a thing onscreen even if it was fake using the image of this girl and the girl probably shouldn't decide on that. It makes the whole "acting" part more difficult as well for several reasons. In the end it becomes impractical.

[Joey]

at least you get it Chaac.

[Stefancos]

do you really want to see menstral blood running down the leg of a 15 year old simulating her very first period ever?

Hmmm...virgin blood!

I haven't been this aroused since Linda Blair pied on the floor in The Exorcist...

[Wojo]

If the character is supposed to be several years younger that might affect the kid. Also they'd need the consention of the girl and the parents to despict such a thing onscreen even if it was fake using the image of this girl and the girl probably shouldn't decide on that. It makes the whole "acting" part more difficult as well for several reasons. In the end it becomes impractical.

Well I certainly hope that we can agree it was more effective to cast a child in the role of Hit-Girl in the movie Kick Ass than a petite 20-something female gymnast. The shock value of Hit-Girl's key line alone made it worth it.

[Chaac]

Hit-Girl had to be a child, that was the point.

[Wojo]

Right, but in some circles, hearing a child say the C word would be just as obscene as seeing a child go through what Joey described in Carrie.

It certainly is indicative of the times in which we live. When Carrie is remade, they will not use a 20-something. They will use a child, and probably tell her parents that she's filming a scene from any number of Judy Blume books-to-movies.

[alicebrallice]

it's official, guys! anchorman 2!

http://www.hitfix.com/articles/anchorman-2-moving-forward-with-will-ferrell-original-director-adam-mckay

Everybody break out the Sex Panther, because Ron Burgundy is back.

That's right: Will Ferrell has signed on to reprise his role as the oafish, teleprompter-bungling, chauvinistic San Diego newscaster in "Anchorman 2", the long-awaited sequel to producer Judd Apatow's2004 comedy hit. Also reportedly back for another go-round are Apatow, original director Adam McKay and co-stars Paul Rudd and Steve Carell (a scene-stealer in the first film as mentally-challenged weatherman Brick Tamland).

my first reaction:
but on second thought... it could turn out great. mckay better bring it!

[Joey]

I will pass on that.

[Alexcremers]

"Matthew Weiner (Mad Men) will make his feature-length directorial debut with ‘You Are Here’, a dramedy based on his original screenplay."


http://screenrant.co...e-sandy-161703/


Hooray! Weiner goes Hollywood!

[Wojo]

Any relation to Anthony Weiner?

[Jason LeBlanc]

Ben Kingsley to play the villain in Iron Man 3

http://www.comicbook...rticle&id=38061

[Wojo]

I still haven't seen Fe Man 2. If there's no Mandarin in 3, I won't care about seeing it either.

[Jason LeBlanc]

This one sounds interesting. It's called "Alfred Hitchcock and the Making of Psycho" and stars Anthony Hopkins as Alfred Hitchcock, Hellen Mirren as his wife, Scarlett Johansson as Janet Leigh, James D’Arcy as Anthony Perkins, as well as Toni Collette and Kurtwood Smith


http://www.cinemable...cles-30356.html

[Wojo]

We haven't seen enough of Kurtwood Smith since That 70's Show went out with a whimper.

[Joey]

Scarlett Johansson as Janet Leigh, what an awful choice. Leigh wasn't a great actress but Johansson can hardly even be called an actress, her range is about the size of her tits.

[Jason LeBlanc]

That's big range then!

[Stefancos]

Indeed!

[Joey]

I hear shes a good **** too because thats how she gets her roles. It sure isn't because of talent.

[Jason LeBlanc]

We haven't seen enough of Kurtwood Smith since That 70's Show went out with a whimper.

+1

[Stefancos]

I hear shes a good **** too because thats how she gets her roles. It sure isn't because of talent.

Well, you would know all about that.

We haven't seen enough of Kurtwood Smith since That 70's Show went out with a whimper.

+1

What happened to the redhead?

[Wojo]

Hot Donna is on that new TV show with Chelsea Handler/Lately.

[Jason LeBlanc]

Duh

[Joey]

I hear shes a good **** too because thats how she gets her roles. It sure isn't because of talent.

Well, you would know all about that.

We haven't seen enough of Kurtwood Smith since That 70's Show went out with a whimper.

+1

What happened to the redhead?

I would Stefan, she is a very limited actress. I do not find her attractive, but clearly you straight bois have lower standards.
She will add nothing to the Avengers.

Hot Donna is on that new TV show with Chelsea Handler/Lately.

she is Chelsea.

[Wojo]

Can we keep the Scarlett Jo bashing separate from the Laura Prepon discussion? Thank you.

[Stefancos]

I agree with Joe that Scarlett is not action movie material. Like Chris Bale.

[Joey]

it is impressive that she can basically do the splits, but it puts her at a distinct disadvantage when fighting.

I love the line in the ads for the Avengers when Loki says "I have an Army"

and Stark replies, "We'll we have a Hulk".

[Quint]

Gay bloke bitches about seriously hot babe and the sun rises in the morning.

[Joey]

she aint that hot. And I know hot.

besides she wouldn't **** any one on this board.

[Stefancos]

Meaning she is too hot for us!

Wait a minute. i know what is this about Joe. You are envious at her, because she's having what you can never get!

[Joey]

I'd rather do Sandra Bullock.

[Stefancos]

No Joe, you wouldn't....

[Quint]

she aint that hot. And I know hot.

She is crème de la crème prime fillet steak hot, drizzled in the nymphae milk of Aphrodite. Her mouth aperture alone is to a red-blooded male the visual allure equivalent to the song of a siren. And below that point it just gets better. And better.

I can only hope you have better taste in men than you do women. Otherwise you're buggered, me old sailor.

[Chaac]

she aint that hot. And I know hot.

Bah.

[BloodBoal]

It hurts me to say it, really, but I agree with Joe on that. Wow. I agree with Joe on something. I feel strange.

[Chaac]

It hurts me to say it, really, but I agree with Joe on that. Wow. I agree with Joe on something. I feel strange.

Really? I think you guys might be asking for too much on the beauty of a woman. Get down to Earth!

[Quint]

Clearly another gay with bad taste in - who'd have thunk it - the opposite sex. What next? Dogs and cats, LIVING TOGETHER?!

This is such an easy and rubbish battle, it's like Stevie Wonder trying to convince me that black is the best colour.

[BloodBoal]

In my house, dogs and cats do live together.


Interpret this sentence any way you want.