Rate "The Lost World: Jurassic Park"!
#81
Posted 31 May 2009 - 06:32 PM
-Oscar Wilde
#82
Posted 31 May 2009 - 08:03 PM
Yes.Rating a score based on every other film score is a terrible way to rate them. Is that how you do it Josh? If I did it like that, like I said earlier, scores like Jurassic Park and The Lost World and Born On The Fourth Of July would be getting 1s and 2s.
You've got to be kidding me. Why? Because most other scores are so much better than JP, TLW, and so on???
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#84
Posted 31 May 2009 - 08:36 PM
Yes.Rating a score based on every other film score is a terrible way to rate them. Is that how you do it Josh? If I did it like that, like I said earlier, scores like Jurassic Park and The Lost World and Born On The Fourth Of July would be getting 1s and 2s.
You've got to be kidding me. Why? Because most other scores are so much better than JP, TLW, and so on???![]()
#85
Posted 31 May 2009 - 08:45 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#86
Posted 31 May 2009 - 09:20 PM
We're talking about the history of film scores here. If you compare The Lost World to something like Ben-Hur or The Godfather, it's nothing.
I'm not especially familiar with either score, but in any case, my smiley overdose was more in response to Jurassic Park being referred to as having one of the worst film scores ever written. I find it to be among the best works of my favorite composer. (As I've said, my opinions on TLW are more lukewarm.)
That's why it's a stupid way to rate scores. I rate based on how it works in the film and factor in how it is compared to other works by the same composer.
I can agree with that, for the most part. If a really excellent composer and a really poor composer were to write the exact same work, I might rate the latter a little higher than the former, but I try to just rate it based on how much I like it, in and of itself.
#87
Posted 31 May 2009 - 09:28 PM
#88
Posted 31 May 2009 - 09:41 PM
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#89
Posted 31 May 2009 - 09:42 PM
#90
Posted 31 May 2009 - 09:42 PM
Score: 3 stars (judging from JW's other ouput).
Do I have to teach you how to vote?
No you don't have to teach me anything. If you judge something by rating it, you need a reference. In this case JW's other scores are the most logical reference in my opinion. Let it up to people how they want to vote, ok? You should be glad people are posting in your "polls" anyway, Josh, you realize that I hope.
#91
Posted 31 May 2009 - 09:43 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#92
Posted 31 May 2009 - 09:46 PM
I stopped voting.
Good thing
#93
Posted 31 May 2009 - 10:16 PM
Score: 3 stars (judging from JW's other ouput).
Do I have to teach you how to vote?
No you don't have to teach me anything. If you judge something by rating it, you need a reference. In this case JW's other scores are the most logical reference in my opinion. Let it up to people how they want to vote, ok? You should be glad people are posting in your "polls" anyway, Josh, you realize that I hope.
#94
Posted 01 June 2009 - 11:19 AM
Score: 3 stars (judging from JW's other ouput).
Do I have to teach you how to vote?
No you don't have to teach me anything. If you judge something by rating it, you need a reference. In this case JW's other scores are the most logical reference in my opinion. Let it up to people how they want to vote, ok? You should be glad people are posting in your "polls" anyway, Josh, you realize that I hope.
I interpret Josh500's sentiments as being similar to that of Syndrome's..."if everybody has super-powers, then no one is super." While I do see the logic in it, I ultimately agree with indy4, I think the best way to judge any given piece of music is to judge from, to use a quote, " a preconceived notion of what [one] would rate certain levels of music quality".
Well, you don't seem to realize that we have a "preconceived notion etc." just because we know many differennt socres... subconsciously we rate them in our minds... or do you think we are born with a "preconceived notion" of what a good score should be?
#95
Posted 01 June 2009 - 11:54 AM
3 stars for the movie.
Ars superior est vita hominum.
"We pop out and come into the world and music is there. We didn't invent it - it's all organised in the atmosphere by divinity or whatever. It's a miracle." - John Williams-
I think music is a stream of some kind. It could be blood. It could be water. It could be ether. Whatever it is it seems to be a living, organic force that’s in motion, that serves humanity and is part of humanity and part of what describes us as humans. We sing, play, dance, all the things that we do. And there is a vibrant and great literature we have been given. ... As musicians, we join the stream. We swim in the stream with all the other millions of music makers. It’s a life force, a strong one, surrounding us and we are part of it. -John Williams-
#96
Posted 01 June 2009 - 07:33 PM
5 stars for the score which is the all out action score of JWs career. I love the jungle rhythms and dark atmosphere of the score in general which is really so different from its predecessor. A complete version of this soundtrack would be most welcome
3 stars for the movie.
I bought the Japanese version of the score, as I said, and there was an addional booklet íncluded that gave a little information on the scoring session: apparently some cues were so difficult to play (especially the percussion-heavy tracks)that the musicians had to rehearse much longer than usual to get it right... One musician even claimed it was the hardest thing he'd ever worked on so far.
Alas, I've lost that Japanese booklet...
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













