I just want more commissioned work by him
So Ridley Scott is directing an Alien prequel... (The official Prometheus Thread)
#41
Posted 31 July 2009 - 10:28 PM
I just want more commissioned work by him
#42
Posted 31 July 2009 - 10:32 PM
I hope they make more use of Howard Hanson's Symphony No 2 this time round.
#43
Posted 01 August 2009 - 02:08 AM
#44
Posted 01 August 2009 - 09:28 AM
#45
Posted 01 August 2009 - 09:36 AM
Alex, EVERYONE needs to work with Alberto Inglesias!!!!! This is an interseting post and one which I will follow regurlarly. My choice for composer would be either Eliot Goldenthal (what an absoultely superb score for "Alien3"?!), or, because he did a rather good job on "The Omen" (not to mention being tutored by you-know-who), Marco Beltrami. I really do think that Scott knows the pitfalls of doing a prequel, but if it is done well, and with integrety, I'm sure that it will make for a good, if not great, film. Scott has wanted to explore the Alien backstory for some time, and now it seems that he will get his wish. I wish him well.Scott needs to work with Alberto Iglesias.
#46
Posted 01 August 2009 - 10:04 AM
#47
Posted 01 August 2009 - 10:37 AM
#48
Posted 01 August 2009 - 10:55 AM
#49
Posted 01 August 2009 - 10:55 AM
Alex, EVERYONE needs to work with Alberto Inglesias!!!!! This is an interseting post and one which I will follow regurlarly. My choice for composer would be either Eliot Goldenthal (what an absoultely superb score for "Alien3"?!), or, because he did a rather good job on "The Omen" (not to mention being tutored by you-know-who), Marco Beltrami. I really do think that Scott knows the pitfalls of doing a prequel, but if it is done well, and with integrety, I'm sure that it will make for a good, if not great, film. Scott has wanted to explore the Alien backstory for some time, and now it seems that he will get his wish. I wish him well.
Scott needs to work with Alberto Iglesias.
I respect Goldenthal as a composer but I feel his score to Alien3 was over the top. The music wanted to be as scary aurally as the alien was visually, if not more so. Because Goldenthal wanted to personify the horror of the beast, the music started to rival with the monster for the same space. I'm not sure whether 'scary' plus 'scary' equals 'twice as scary'. I know I was paying way too much attention to the score than was necessary. The reason why I mentioned Alberto Iglesias is that I think he can be a silent partner to Scott. Someone who is there but you don't really notice him. At least, that is precisely what Ridley Scott has accomplished with the first film and I wouldn't mind if he went for the same approach. (Of course, I still think Scott saying "yes" doesn't mean it will happen)
Alex
#50
Posted 01 August 2009 - 05:12 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#51
Posted 01 August 2009 - 05:39 PM
I think this movie is rather an odd choice for a(nother) prequel. But hey, it's Ridley. At least it isn't JJ Abrams.
I'd watch a JJA Alien movie. At least it'd have characters.
#52
Posted 01 August 2009 - 05:41 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#53
Posted 01 August 2009 - 06:00 PM
Karol
#54
Posted 01 August 2009 - 06:03 PM
I think this movie is rather an odd choice for a(nother) prequel. But hey, it's Ridley. At least it isn't JJ Abrams.
I'd watch a JJA Alien movie. At least it'd have characters.
No real or memorable characters in Cloverfield. And if Star Trek is your idea of a film with strong characters, then you must be Marian Schedenig ... Oh wait!
#55
Posted 01 August 2009 - 06:19 PM
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ZzhKqCSNjzw/Sd3aUryBnvI/AAAAAAAAJLQ/79a7N6t-JxE/s400/aliens.bmp
#56
Posted 01 August 2009 - 06:25 PM
Karol
#57
Posted 01 August 2009 - 06:58 PM
#58
Posted 01 August 2009 - 09:40 PM
#59
Posted 02 August 2009 - 07:09 AM
#60
Posted 02 August 2009 - 12:38 PM
#61
Posted 02 August 2009 - 02:41 PM
I think this movie is rather an odd choice for a(nother) prequel. But hey, it's Ridley. At least it isn't JJ Abrams.
I'd watch a JJA Alien movie. At least it'd have characters.
No real or memorable characters in Cloverfield.
That's just a JJA production

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#62
Posted 03 August 2009 - 02:51 PM
I'm already begining to vomit at the thought of Zimmer completely ballsing up the "Alien" prequel! If any composer could suck the living soul out of a perfectly good film, it's Zimmer. The sooner he retires, the beter.If Scott makes this film, I'm willing to bet Zimmer will end up being the composer.
#63
Posted 03 August 2009 - 05:25 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#64
Posted 03 August 2009 - 07:07 PM
I mean, let's face it, guys, we're far better off with the SW prequels, ain't we?! They gave us three brand new JW scores!Have the Star Wars prequels taught us nothing?

Human aggression is instinctual. Humans have not evolved any ritualised aggression-inhibiting mechanisms to ensure the survival of the species. For this reason man is considered a very dangerous animal.
-- Konrad Lorenz
#65
Posted 03 August 2009 - 07:10 PM
Or maybe this time he'll actually use Goldsmith's music from Alien. Or maybe he'll just cobble bits from all 4 Alien scores.
#66
Posted 03 August 2009 - 07:12 PM
That's a good point!Or maybe this time he'll actually use Goldsmith's music from Alien. Or maybe he'll just cobble bits from all 4 Alien scores.

Human aggression is instinctual. Humans have not evolved any ritualised aggression-inhibiting mechanisms to ensure the survival of the species. For this reason man is considered a very dangerous animal.
-- Konrad Lorenz
#67
Posted 05 May 2010 - 07:40 AM
#68
Posted 05 May 2010 - 07:54 AM
#69
Posted 05 May 2010 - 08:20 AM
Interested to see if he'll really visualize the Space Jockey - as an individual or a race - as he was talking about doing.
I think they are going to be a variation on the Na'vi but with advanced technology.
So, Charles, you're all for demystifying the first film?
Alex
#70
Posted 05 May 2010 - 08:37 AM
Interested to see if he'll really visualize the Space Jockey - as an individual or a race - as he was talking about doing.
I think they are going to be a variation on the Na'vi but with advanced technology.
So, Charles, you're all for demystifying the first film?
Alex
Yeah. If it was anyone but Ridley, I probably wouldn't be. But the franchise has gotten to a ridiculous point already, so I'd like to see something that has always intrigued me (since the days of the brilliant initial Dark Horse Comics run of ALIENS). And it's just nice to see Ridley return to SF, really.
I'm not sure it can take away much from the first film for me anyway (I've already learned to ignore that kind of thing with the prequels). Even if it sucks, that movie is still absolute greatness. Even if the lights on the bottom of the Nostromo are still wonky.
Besides, it's going to be made so I can either cry foul or look forward to it. I choose to look forward to it.
#71
Posted 01 October 2010 - 08:41 AM
Scott and Fox clashRidley Scott is at odds with 20th Century Fox, the major studios behind the project over budgetary and creative differences, according to sources close to the production. It would seem Scott wants a budget of around $250m to make it a sci-fi spectacular, and is also pushing for an 18-rated level of violence and horror. Fox, however, don’t plan on investing anywhere near that sum, and are keen to get a 15 rating to maximise the audience appeal.
Alex
#72
Posted 01 October 2010 - 08:52 AM
#73
Posted 11 November 2010 - 08:23 AM
#74
Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:05 AM
#75
Posted 11 November 2010 - 10:19 AM
#76
Posted 11 November 2010 - 11:21 AM
#77
Posted 11 November 2010 - 02:42 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#78
Posted 11 November 2010 - 03:16 PM
#79
Posted 11 November 2010 - 03:30 PM
#80
Posted 11 November 2010 - 03:33 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









