Star Trek Into Darkness [The Big Bad Star Trek (X) II Thread)
#241
Posted 07 November 2011 - 02:20 AM
Except for Neil of course.
#242
Posted 07 November 2011 - 02:32 AM
#243
Posted 07 November 2011 - 04:51 AM
Star Trek XI was the worst Trek movie to date.
#244
Posted 07 November 2011 - 04:54 AM
#245
Posted 07 November 2011 - 04:55 AM
#246
Posted 08 November 2011 - 07:42 AM
By "Star Trek," do you mean air re-runs?
Of course!
Gerald Fried's ST's > Michael Giacchino's ST
John Williams sucks, he doesn't write with a quill pen, there is no emotion in pencil music ! Purcell is the man !Among all the things I have done in my short and pitiful life, becoming an inside joke on JWFAN is the one I'm the least proud of.
#247
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:12 PM
I agree with most people that having Khan as the villain in this next one is a dumb idea, and it's stupid that people keep expecting him to be the villian.Khan works as a great villain -- nay, the greatest Star Trek villain ever -- because he has a history with Kirk and we already know what it is.
...
In JJ Abrams' universe, Khan is potentially still floating around in space, frozen in the Botany Bay. But he hasn't met Kirk yet, or tried to take over his ship. He hasn't been marooned on a planet with a beautiful wife but left to die when nobody checked in on him. He has no vendetta against Kirk.
...
In JJ Abrams' rebooted universe, Khan is very bad villain material.
That having been said... there's no reason the upcoming film would have to be a re-working Wrath of Khan. Couldn't a more plausible idea be a re-working of Space Seed itself? Kirk & co's first encounter with Khan totally re-imagined. We could see the crew finding the Botany Bay and getting on friendly terms with them, quite naively, and then WHAM! Khan and his gang go all bad-ass on the crew and take over.
I still don't think they'd go the way-too-obvious route of doing Khan for the next film, but still I suppose that Space Seed scenario could be a possibility.
#248
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:19 PM
Then again, when you have those screenwriters to work with, you're probably incredibly limited in your scope.
#249
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:24 PM
Mmmh that depends with how much they just want to obtain money.
#250
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:25 PM
How can doing that again be interesting?
I want something new!
Mmmh that depends with how much they just want to obtain money.
Don't watch any Star Trek then, because it's success never lied with it's originality.
#251
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:27 PM
#253
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:33 PM
I involved the search of an artifact through space and finding it in a weird but scientifically accurate solar system. The climax of the film involved the main crew inside the mechanical remains of a city of an lost civilization trying to save their life. Sort of like Indy IV but cooler. The main villain was an alien queen who wanted to be human.
Then I realized I would never write any actual Star Trek film and I ditched the thing as useless.
#255
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:38 PM
#256
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:40 PM
It depends on the actor or the villain. Unfortunately, most of the movies seem to want to ape Khan, which I guess makes sense given its plaudits. But I'm getting tired of it.
Bana was fine as Nero, but the role was really underwritten.
The point is. Star Trek (2009) was a big action spectacle, and a big hit. They are not going to follow that be a cerebral "thinking man's" sci-fi film. Best we can hope for that this time the script will be good....
#257
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:46 PM
#261
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:55 PM
They could also use relativistic bombs! Mountains disintegrating instantly! So many cool things to do in a space opera and we get lasers!
#263
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:58 PM
#264
Posted 08 November 2011 - 04:00 PM
I also think it would be cool if the second film sets up a much larger storyline that only partially gets resolved at the end, with the adversary not being truly defeated until the third film
#265
Posted 08 November 2011 - 04:04 PM
I don't know how many films can we get with the new cast.
#267
Posted 08 November 2011 - 04:16 PM
#268
Posted 08 November 2011 - 04:24 PM
I also think it would be cool if the second film sets up a much larger storyline that only partially gets resolved at the end, with the adversary not being truly defeated until the third film
Booring. That's like The Matrix all over again.
#269
Posted 08 November 2011 - 04:26 PM
I think it's difficult to get it right.
#271
Posted 08 November 2011 - 05:01 PM
#272
Posted 08 November 2011 - 05:28 PM
I also think it would be cool if the second film sets up a much larger storyline that only partially gets resolved at the end, with the adversary not being truly defeated until the third film
So we get one big OS Star Trek story. Like cold war with the Klingons (second movie deals with an isolated incident, which, when resolved reveals a larger Klingon plan?) or something.
Seems like a waste of two films. Let them explore. The only between-installment continuity should lie within the main characters.
#273
Posted 08 November 2011 - 05:31 PM
#274
Posted 09 November 2011 - 01:18 AM
#275
Posted 09 November 2011 - 01:29 AM
#276
Posted 09 November 2011 - 02:40 AM
Maybe we'll get some Kirk-Fu dropkicks.There will be a supervillain with a superweapon and Kirk will fight him one-on-one, right?
#277
Posted 09 November 2011 - 03:03 AM
And Pirates of the Caribbean. And Star Wars.
I think it's difficult to get it right.
QF frickin' T. It's a great concept - in theory, I have no problem with a standalone film spawning a trilogy in which the two sequels tell a single story - but there's significant precedent for it being done really, really poorly. (I'm thinking POTC more than Star Wars here.)
#278
Posted 09 November 2011 - 03:25 AM
#279
Posted 09 November 2011 - 04:09 AM
#280
Posted 09 November 2011 - 04:59 AM
Back To The Future II and III?
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Movie Talk, 2013 Films, Star Trek, JJ Abrams, Michael Giacchino
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Trek: Voyager set coming from La-La Land in 2014!Started by Jason LeBlanc, 13 Jun 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Michael Giacchino's Dawn of The Planet Of The Apes (2014)Started by Matt C, 14 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
JWFan Reviews →
SCORE: Star Trek Into DarknessStarted by Blumenkohl, 14 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Ron Jones' The Best Of Both Worlds (New GNP Crescendo CD 2013) Star Trek The Next GenerationStarted by crocodile, 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Trek Into Darkness SPOILERS ALLOWED Discussion ThreadStarted by Jason LeBlanc, 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















