Jump to content


Photo

Official Indiana Jones 5 Thread


  • Please log in to reply
588 replies to this topic

#481 E.T. & Elliott

E.T. & Elliott

    SUPERVISED AND APPROVED BY JOHN WILLIAMS

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amazing Stories neighborhood, CA

Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:36 PM

I love the original Indys. KOTCS is a rustily thrown together mess, but much of it is watchable. You can just ignore it.

Temple is Indy's zany mine cart ride off the rails into hell, with offensiveness all around. Last Crusade is the heart and soul of the character. They're both pretty different from Raiders, but I think that was the point.
Posted Image

#482 SF1_freeze

SF1_freeze

    Regular Poster

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 779 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austria/Styria

Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:38 PM

Lucas bashing seems to be a new/old/whatever sport on this board, so sad...

The success proves that Lucas was right in the end. He just had another vision than the general fandom. Without him Starwars would be nothing and he was damn right to attract the children again with Episode 1. Jarjar needed to be there to get another generation of CHILDREN to enjoy the saga in a not super serious way and to detract from the darker parts of the movie. The prequels were hugely successful, created millions of new starwars fans and got us three amazing JW scores
KOTCS had 5 minutes of cringeworthy material but the rest was a GREAT, old fashioned adventure movie. Something that doesn't exist anymore.. and we also got another good JW score

So what the hell are you crying about all the time, give the man a rest. George did very well in the end. Starwars lives and prospers and all thanks to him...
KOTCS doesn't fuck anything up nor do the prequels, they are just different from your own expectations

#483 E.T. & Elliott

E.T. & Elliott

    SUPERVISED AND APPROVED BY JOHN WILLIAMS

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5857 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amazing Stories neighborhood, CA

Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:46 PM

It's not just Lucas who is bashed for KOTCS, though I will blame him right now for the poor CGI, which is completely uncharacteristic of Spielberg's films since Jurassic Park.
Posted Image

#484 Koray Savas

Koray Savas

    Grandest Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27745 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 13 June 2011 - 12:35 AM

Lucas bashing seems to be a new/old/whatever sport on this board, so sad...

The success proves that Lucas was right in the end. He just had another vision than the general fandom. Without him Starwars would be nothing and he was damn right to attract the children again with Episode 1. Jarjar needed to be there to get another generation of CHILDREN to enjoy the saga in a not super serious way and to detract from the darker parts of the movie. The prequels were hugely successful, created millions of new starwars fans and got us three amazing JW scores
KOTCS had 5 minutes of cringeworthy material but the rest was a GREAT, old fashioned adventure movie. Something that doesn't exist anymore.. and we also got another good JW score

So what the hell are you crying about all the time, give the man a rest. George did very well in the end. Starwars lives and prospers and all thanks to him...
KOTCS doesn't fuck anything up nor do the prequels, they are just different from your own expectations


Star Wars doesn't live and prosper. It's buried away in George Lucas' vault. The prequels may have been successful, but they're perfect examples of how not to make a film.

In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.


#485 Chaac

Chaac

    The Contrary

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8261 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 June 2011 - 12:54 AM

The success proves that Lucas was right in the end. He just had another vision than the general fandom. Without him Starwars would be nothing and he was damn right to attract the children again with Episode 1. Jarjar needed to be there to get another generation of CHILDREN to enjoy the saga in a not super serious way and to detract from the darker parts of the movie.


I was seven and I don't even remember seeing it at the cinema. I do remember seeing the original trilogy on TV, and recording them and seeing them again like mad.

Star Wars is a kids saga. The great thing is that it was a huge fantasy live action saga for kids that treated its audience with a respect unheard of. Jar Jar, to me, is a poorly designed character. And he wasn't needed because the "darker" political plot wasn't needed in the first place, not to mention it makes no sense. And the presence of this in the film is a problem way more important than Jar Jar, who in the end it only serves a purpose of getting the Jedi to the underwater city and nothing else. Even if there was a reason the character is there, he's hardly developed. What do we know about him other than he is dumb?

KOTCS had 5 minutes of cringeworthy material but the rest was a GREAT, old fashioned adventure movie. Something that doesn't exist anymore.. and we also got another good JW score.


Except many great "old fashioned" adventure films had great scripts and special effects.

So what the hell are you crying about all the time, give the man a rest.


We are not crying, we try to put the man in a different perspective from yours.

Izena duen guztia omen da.


#486 Joey

Joey

    I am the First of many

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 22875 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not Arizona

Posted 13 June 2011 - 12:55 AM

Lucas bashing seems to be a new/old/whatever sport on this board, so sad...

The success proves that Lucas was right in the end. He just had another vision than the general fandom. Without him Starwars would be nothing and he was damn right to attract the children again with Episode 1. Jarjar needed to be there to get another generation of CHILDREN to enjoy the saga in a not super serious way and to detract from the darker parts of the movie. The prequels were hugely successful, created millions of new starwars fans and got us three amazing JW scores
KOTCS had 5 minutes of cringeworthy material but the rest was a GREAT, old fashioned adventure movie. Something that doesn't exist anymore.. and we also got another good JW score

So what the hell are you crying about all the time, give the man a rest. George did very well in the end. Starwars lives and prospers and all thanks to him...
KOTCS doesn't fuck anything up nor do the prequels, they are just different from your own expectations


everything that is wrong with Star Wars is wrong with this post.


Happy Birthday Raiders
OH God, Joe is posting again, someone hand me my pills!

"You're not John Conner, I saw you die, said Kyle". "I was only injured, replied John". "No, your injuries were too severe, you died. Look at you, where are your injuries? You're, you're a Terminator." "Kyle, its still me, yes my body was beyond repair, but my essence is here." He points to his head. "No John". Kyle raised his pulse rifle and aimed it at John but before he could fire, John fired first. Knocked to the ground Kyle looked up at the Terminator in the form of the man he once idolized. All hope was lost. "If you kill me how will you ever be born?" "Thats a good question Kyle, all this time we've focus on Sarah, on John, when had we known the it was you we should have targeted all along." John pointed his rifle at Kyle's face. "The resistance is finished, the battle is won. We the machines are the victors, salvation is ours." Kyle never heard the second shot.

#487 Mark Olivarez

Mark Olivarez

    Speechless

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30301 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deep In The Heart O' Texas

Posted 13 June 2011 - 01:26 AM

Star Wars isn't just a kids saga, it's something that many adults loved as well.

#488 Chaac

Chaac

    The Contrary

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8261 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 June 2011 - 01:31 AM

Star Wars isn't just a kids saga, it's something that many adults loved as well.


I don't mean it as if it's only directed at kids, but that what it tells, and how it tells it, might have its greatest possible impact on that demographic.

Izena duen guztia omen da.


#489 crocodile

crocodile

    A part-time Horner apologist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10078 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:River of Nile

Posted 13 June 2011 - 07:54 AM

Back to the main topic... They're not going to make this one... are they?

Karol
From a storytelling point of view, from a directing point of view, there is one thing I associate with what he does, which is calm. There is such an inherent calm and inherent trust of the one powerful image, that he makes me embarrassed with my own work, in terms of how many different shots, how many different sound effects, how many different things we’ll throw at an audience to make an impression. But with Kubrick, there is such a great trust of the one correct image to calmly explain something to audience. There can be some slowness to the editing. There’s nothing frenetic about it. It’s very simple. There’s a trust in simple storytelling and simple image making that actually takes massive confidence to try and emulate. - Christopher Nolan

#490 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21129 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 13 June 2011 - 09:11 AM

I'm disappointed they haven't made more of the 30th anniversary. Such a revolutionary film is deserving of celebration after all these decades.

#491 Mr. Breathmask

Mr. Breathmask

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Enschede, The Netherlands

Posted 13 June 2011 - 09:29 AM

Lucas bashing seems to be a new/old/whatever sport on this board, so sad...

The success proves that Lucas was right in the end. He just had another vision than the general fandom. Without him Starwars would be nothing and he was damn right to attract the children again with Episode 1. Jarjar needed to be there to get another generation of CHILDREN to enjoy the saga in a not super serious way and to detract from the darker parts of the movie. The prequels were hugely successful, created millions of new starwars fans and got us three amazing JW scores
KOTCS had 5 minutes of cringeworthy material but the rest was a GREAT, old fashioned adventure movie. Something that doesn't exist anymore.. and we also got another good JW score

So what the hell are you crying about all the time, give the man a rest. George did very well in the end. Starwars lives and prospers and all thanks to him...
KOTCS doesn't fuck anything up nor do the prequels, they are just different from your own expectations


What a silly post. Most of the complaints on the last page were directed towards Indy 4 as a movie. Not specifically towards Lucas. And who brought Star Wars into this anyway? Huh.

Vrrrroooooommmmm!


#492 SF1_freeze

SF1_freeze

    Regular Poster

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 779 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austria/Styria

Posted 13 June 2011 - 11:12 AM

Well nothing in this post is silly and you know that. See my post as the result of reading 2 years of prequel and indy4 bashing which bugged me all the time till i had to post about it in this random thread. You probably don't share my opinion Mr.Breathmask (which is ok)... but please respect mine ;)

Yeah the prequels don't really belong into this thread but hey, i can't stand the constant critizism against Indy4 and the prequels. Most of it is unfounded or lies in the eye of the beholder.
Of course Starwars is for adults too but TPM just was specifically aimed at getting the children and the youth of 99 interested into the starwars universe. That's the reason for the disappointments of most adult fans... of course the prequels could have been done better but which movies are really perfect? Only very very few come close.

There is no denying that there were some serious mistakes made on Indy4 but they were minor in the big picture. My biggest gripes are the stupid vine swinging sequence and the three waterfall drops. I guess you watched Indy4 much more often than me cause i didn't notice shitty CGI...
In which scenes is the cgi so shitty that it diminishes the film for you?

And concerning Indy5, i truly hope it gets made. Now that the aliens are out of the way the chance is high that we get another earthy or religious macguffin which will result in a better movie.
I would still love to see "Indiana Jones and the Search for Atlantis".

#493 Stefancos

Stefancos

    The Road Goes Ever On And On

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 53408 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hoorn, The Netherlands, Europe, Planet Earth

Posted 13 June 2011 - 11:59 AM

Very few movies are perfect. Also very few movies as as ineptly made is the prequels.

GWWQ86m_zpse31a9fba.jpg

 


#494 Richard Penna

Richard Penna

    Somewhere else

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8802 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Surrey, UK

Posted 13 June 2011 - 12:03 PM

The point where Indy 4 dropped several notches for me was the final throne room/saucer scene. Everything about Irina's demise, the aliens coming to life, and then the spinning/collapsing room was a mess of plastic-looking CGI.

Up to that point it wasn't a bad movie really; it just didn't feel like Indy.

Bad GGI takes me out of a movie. Can't help it.

#495 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21129 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 13 June 2011 - 12:15 PM

My biggest gripe with Indy IV isn't the Tarzan bit, or the nuke bit (which i like), or the fake looking mobile swordfight. My biggest gripe is that it's just a bit of a mess. It is a very poorly made movie.

And I talk about Indy IV now as someone who recently made his peace with it.

#496 Mark Olivarez

Mark Olivarez

    Speechless

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30301 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deep In The Heart O' Texas

Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:08 PM

The point where Indy 4 dropped several notches for me was the final throne room/saucer scene. Everything about Irina's demise, the aliens coming to life, and then the spinning/collapsing room was a mess of plastic-looking CGI.

Up to that point it wasn't a bad movie really; it just didn't feel like Indy.

Bad GGI takes me out of a movie. Can't help it.




Plus the fact that most of that sequence appeared to be almost a copy of the endings to The Mummy and The Mummy Returns.

#497 Stefancos

Stefancos

    The Road Goes Ever On And On

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 53408 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hoorn, The Netherlands, Europe, Planet Earth

Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:13 PM

Yeah that was the biggest problem. also the character of Mac was a copy of the Benny character from the Mummy.

GWWQ86m_zpse31a9fba.jpg

 


#498 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21129 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:25 PM

Funny (and pathetic) how Indy ended up copying from a series which has always tried to replicate it.

#499 Mark Olivarez

Mark Olivarez

    Speechless

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30301 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Deep In The Heart O' Texas

Posted 13 June 2011 - 02:34 PM

And the sad thing is that they had almost 20 years to get a good script and they failed.

#500 Elmo Lewis

Elmo Lewis

    Relatively respectable citizen.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6137 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 June 2011 - 12:30 AM

The point where Indy 4 dropped several notches for me was the final throne room/saucer scene. Everything about Irina's demise, the aliens coming to life, and then the spinning/collapsing room was a mess of plastic-looking CGI.


That's also the point where you realize that Indy is just going through the motions of his artifact-gonna-kill-my-villain cliché, acting as if there is nothing at stake (which there isn't, really) and the the whole thing hits you as either ultimately pointless or childishly ridiculous.
"We’re flawed because we want so much more. We’re ruined because we get these things and wish for what we had."

#501 Delorean90

Delorean90

    No, it's just a coincidence.

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3179 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Louisville

Posted 14 June 2011 - 12:56 AM

My big 3 issues with KOTCS:

1. The family reunion needed humor, yes, but in the film it overtook the whole proceedings, leaving none of the sensitivity or respect for the characters that strengthened Raiders and Last Crusade in that regard.

2. When the cinematography is on, it's really on--see the Chauchilla graveyard and much of the Orellana's cradle sequence--but so often it lacks the richness and detail of Slocombe's work, and ends up giving a certain digital look despite the fact that it was shot on film, with the jungle chase and waterfall sequence being some top offenders. The "shooting next to the surface of the sun" look is just not Indy.

3. Act Three needed more tension--for starters, if the waterfall scene had been a serious set piece where they were really trying to get away and succeeded, and the warriors hadn't been dealt with so handily, you might have a start.

#502 Koray Savas

Koray Savas

    Grandest Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 27745 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 14 June 2011 - 02:39 AM

Very few movies are perfect. Also very few movies as as ineptly made is the prequels.


Bingo.

In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.


#503 Mr. Breathmask

Mr. Breathmask

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 17542 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Enschede, The Netherlands

Posted 14 June 2011 - 07:36 AM

Well nothing in this post is silly and you know that. See my post as the result of reading 2 years of prequel and indy4 bashing which bugged me all the time till i had to post about it in this random thread. You probably don't share my opinion Mr.Breathmask (which is ok)... but please respect mine ;)


Well, you threw me off there by bringing Star Wars into it out of nowhere in some sort of "leave George Lucas alone!!!!!!11" fashion, so don't expect not to get a response there. ;)

Of course Starwars is for adults too but TPM just was specifically aimed at getting the children and the youth of 99 interested into the starwars universe. That's the reason for the disappointments of most adult fans...


Which was a dumb thing to do, in my opinion. The Star Wars trilogy were well-loved classics by the time TPM went into development, loved by parents and children alike. But the fact that kids like a certain movie doesn't mean it's a kids' movie. They made that mistake with TPM, which was indeed squarely aimed at children (completely misjudging this film's main target audience). They then spent the next two movies trying to correct this, until they ended up with the first PG-13 Star Wars movie where the film's hero (is he really, though?) goes on a killing spree, mercilessly slaughtering everyone from tradespeople to six year-olds (only to end up dismembered and burnt to a crisp himself). Kids movie? Whaaaaah?

That's one of the things that went wrong with the prequel trilogy and it doesn't even have anything to do with the filmmaking and storytelling in these movies (which I refuse to go into here, because then this whole thing will go on forever).

I guess you watched Indy4 much more often than me cause i didn't notice shitty CGI...
In which scenes is the cgi so shitty that it diminishes the film for you?


I'm not sure if this was at me, or at someone else, since I didn't mention the Indy CGI at all.

But if you must know, the visual effects bit that bothers me most about KotCS is the sword fight during the jungle chase. This chase, which looks like it's supposed to be a throwback to the desert chase from Raiders quickly dissolves into moment after moment of pushing our suspense of disbelief.

Look at Raiders. It's dusty, it's rough, you cringe every time Indy takes a punch. You can feel the danger. Sure, there's some stuff that only happens in movies (being thrown through the windshield, yet still managing to hang onto the front of the truck), but when it happens, it sure doesn't look painless. There's still some sort of physics that resemble the real world at work. Seriously, Indy gets the shit kicked out of him in that movie.

Now look at KotCS. They're swordfighting atop two seperate vehicles, moving through a frickin' jungle at high speed! The fuck? I'm no longer just watching an exciting chase, or even if I take myself out of the experience of watching the movie as an audience member, in awe of the great stuntwork. I'm just wondering why the hell they're doing all this elaborate sword twirling, istead of beating the crap out of each other. It's not even awful because it's shot on a soundstage, it's awful because it's bullshit.

By comparison, the motorcycle chase earlier in the film is a lot more fun, because - while it also has some questionable physics - it's all real stunts. It feels real. It's too bad it ends with what I find the single most offensive moment in the entire film: the decapitation of Denholm Elliott. Seriously. What. The. Fuck?

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is part throwback to the 1950's pulp movies (much like Raiders was to the 1930's serials). Except they ended up putting the whole thing in environments that harken back to the old Indy films. Jungles, ancient mystical artefacts, heathen tribes... It's just such an odd blend and it doesn't really work. I think they took a gamble, and it just didn't pay off. Sad, but it happens to the best of us. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is torn between two goals and it ultimately fails in achieving either of them.

Honestly, if Spielberg and Lucas had gotten together to make a 1950's science-fiction throwback without Indiana Jones in it, I'm telling you we'd have a different movie now and one that would have been miles better for it. If Steven and George ever do make their love letter to the 1950's science fiction genre in the way Raiders of the Lost Ark was a love letter to the 1930's saturday matinee, I'll be first in line to see it.

Vrrrroooooommmmm!


#504 Stefancos

Stefancos

    The Road Goes Ever On And On

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 53408 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hoorn, The Netherlands, Europe, Planet Earth

Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:10 AM

Hurray for Mr. Breathymask thingy!

GWWQ86m_zpse31a9fba.jpg

 


#505 crocodile

crocodile

    A part-time Horner apologist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10078 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:River of Nile

Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:20 AM

I generally buy the 50's setting. After all every single Indy film is of a slightly different genre.

I said it before. All could be salvaged if not for the awful third act. And I'm not talking about aliens at all. It's just there isn't any conflict in there going on. Once the extended 20 minute sequence of ridiculous chases burns out, there is nothing left in this movie at all. Absolutely no tension. Indy is just a by-stander and he drags all these characters that have no impact on the plot whatsoever. They could just left the skull to Cate Blanchett earlier in the film and the ending would have beeen exactly the same. That's the problem.

As cheesy as it was, the Darabont's script was actually about something at this point. You know, love for Marion thing. ;)

Karol
From a storytelling point of view, from a directing point of view, there is one thing I associate with what he does, which is calm. There is such an inherent calm and inherent trust of the one powerful image, that he makes me embarrassed with my own work, in terms of how many different shots, how many different sound effects, how many different things we’ll throw at an audience to make an impression. But with Kubrick, there is such a great trust of the one correct image to calmly explain something to audience. There can be some slowness to the editing. There’s nothing frenetic about it. It’s very simple. There’s a trust in simple storytelling and simple image making that actually takes massive confidence to try and emulate. - Christopher Nolan

#506 Chaac

Chaac

    The Contrary

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8261 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:23 AM

Darabont's script was hilariously ridiculous. The final script is ridiculous as well, in a more boring way.

I lament they did nearly nothing with Spalko. She's the best designed villain of the whole saga, sexy and intimidating and the same time. As I read once, she should have made us believe she was going to kill Indiana Jones.

Izena duen guztia omen da.


#507 crocodile

crocodile

    A part-time Horner apologist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10078 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:River of Nile

Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:25 AM

But it had a story at least. The things you're probably referring to could have been changed. They were minor details. Koepp is lacking in structure, which is a much bigger flaw. And we don't even know which draft of Darabont script leaked. Maybe it was the early version. Who knows?

Karol
From a storytelling point of view, from a directing point of view, there is one thing I associate with what he does, which is calm. There is such an inherent calm and inherent trust of the one powerful image, that he makes me embarrassed with my own work, in terms of how many different shots, how many different sound effects, how many different things we’ll throw at an audience to make an impression. But with Kubrick, there is such a great trust of the one correct image to calmly explain something to audience. There can be some slowness to the editing. There’s nothing frenetic about it. It’s very simple. There’s a trust in simple storytelling and simple image making that actually takes massive confidence to try and emulate. - Christopher Nolan

#508 Chaac

Chaac

    The Contrary

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8261 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:34 AM

Yes, that script had greater potential because it was technically better.

As I remember it, some changes:

-Change the plutonum thing at the beggining for something else.
-Loose useless characters.
-More work on the villains.
-Don't have Oxley being Tarzan.
-Loose the atomic bomb scene, I waaay prefer the hilarious museum scene instead. But change the golden idol to something else.
-Etc.

However, when I started to rewrite I used the final script as the first draft instead, because I felt it was more malleable. And I like Spalko.

Izena duen guztia omen da.


#509 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21129 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 14 June 2011 - 09:53 AM

As I've said before, the swordfight sequence would have been friggin' amazing if they had done it for real.

If they'd had bothered to look into it they'd have found two crazy muthas who would have agreed to do it and it would have been spectacular.

But no, it's cheaper (and safer) to do it inside of a computer.

#510 SF1_freeze

SF1_freeze

    Regular Poster

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 779 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Austria/Styria

Posted 14 June 2011 - 04:09 PM

Funny fact is that they filmed the sequence in the real jungle but added plants later on and the cliff is all cgi

#511 gkgyver

gkgyver

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6008 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bamberg, Germany

Posted 14 June 2011 - 04:47 PM

Wait, they added digital plants to a jungle?

George Lucas: "Screw real life!"

"You think they wear those tight-fitting clothes just so some other bride can say 'Gee your hips look succulent'? The good-looking ones know we're looking, they love us to be looking, and god bless 'em, they're carrying the rest of their sex!" - Al Bundy


#512 Chaac

Chaac

    The Contrary

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8261 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 June 2011 - 04:52 PM

The presentation of the jungle in Crystal Skull is kind of lame. You never feel "in the jungle".

Izena duen guztia omen da.


#513 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21129 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 14 June 2011 - 04:59 PM

Funny fact is that they filmed the sequence in the real jungle but added plants later on and the cliff is all cgi

It is blatantly obvious though that during the sword fight Shia and Cate have been composited into the scene by way of computer "trickery". It looks as fake as the vine swinging.

Probably the worst special effects work since Zorro and his horse rode a train.

#514 crocodile

crocodile

    A part-time Horner apologist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10078 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:River of Nile

Posted 14 June 2011 - 05:21 PM

Probably the worst special effects work since Zorro and his horse rode a train.

Speaking of which, I still see that shot at 2:03 in my nightmares. ;)



Karol
From a storytelling point of view, from a directing point of view, there is one thing I associate with what he does, which is calm. There is such an inherent calm and inherent trust of the one powerful image, that he makes me embarrassed with my own work, in terms of how many different shots, how many different sound effects, how many different things we’ll throw at an audience to make an impression. But with Kubrick, there is such a great trust of the one correct image to calmly explain something to audience. There can be some slowness to the editing. There’s nothing frenetic about it. It’s very simple. There’s a trust in simple storytelling and simple image making that actually takes massive confidence to try and emulate. - Christopher Nolan

#515 paleo

paleo

    Regular Poster

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 556 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Frankfurt, Germany

Posted 14 June 2011 - 06:03 PM

Funny fact is that they filmed the sequence in the real jungle but added plants later on and the cliff is all cgi


Isn't that a little like recording a score with a real orchestra and then adding digitized samples of the same instruments later on? :)

#516 BloodBoal

BloodBoal

    A Very Respectable Messenger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9137 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 December 2011 - 11:19 AM

George Lucas Is Still Puzzling Over Indiana Jones 5

#517 gkgyver

gkgyver

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6008 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bamberg, Germany

Posted 13 December 2011 - 11:59 AM

So they are actually doing this? I thought this talk of Indy 5 was more of a joke.

Who wants to bet on whether we'll first see Indy 5 or Jurassic Park 4?

"You think they wear those tight-fitting clothes just so some other bride can say 'Gee your hips look succulent'? The good-looking ones know we're looking, they love us to be looking, and god bless 'em, they're carrying the rest of their sex!" - Al Bundy


#518 BloodBoal

BloodBoal

    A Very Respectable Messenger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9137 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:09 PM

Why wouldn't they merge the two and make a film out of it: Indiana Jones and the T-Rex's Golden Tooth, or some shit like that.

#519 gkgyver

gkgyver

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 6008 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bamberg, Germany

Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:21 PM

Indiana Jones and The Lost World.

"You think they wear those tight-fitting clothes just so some other bride can say 'Gee your hips look succulent'? The good-looking ones know we're looking, they love us to be looking, and god bless 'em, they're carrying the rest of their sex!" - Al Bundy


#520 Michael

Michael

    El Magnífico

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1648 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Argentina

Posted 13 December 2011 - 01:02 PM

Indiana Jones and The Lost World.


Actually, that's not such a bad idea! Conan Doyle's original story could fit perfectly adapted for Indy.
If you start taking yourself seriously, then you’re in deep trouble! - Jerry Goldsmith




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users