Official Indiana Jones 5 Thread
#41
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:18 PM
- John Williams
#42
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:23 PM
BTW, I agree with this sentiment 100%: Though the excuse for making this fifth film is that they all had a blast making the fourth, I hope the true motivating factor is "We're sorry, and we can do better."
#43
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:45 PM
Yeah.... well. I'm ecstatic (said he, and yawned). Though it could be years before they settle on a script.
BTW, I agree with this sentiment 100%: Though the excuse for making this fifth film is that they all had a blast making the fourth, I hope the true motivating factor is "We're sorry, and we can do better."
With Lucas it's that way: "Well, there will always be some who won't like it, so why should we bother...?"
#44
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:50 PM
With Lucas it's that way: "Well, there will always be some who won't like it, so why should we bother...?"
Dunno whether you really mean that or just being facetious, but I'm sure GL also wants to make a movie that satisfies the fans (more or less).
I think he showed that when he brought in Spielberg for RotS.
#45
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:57 PM
With Lucas it's that way: "Well, there will always be some who won't like it, so why should we bother...?"
Dunno whether you really mean that or just being facetious, but I'm sure GL also wants to make a movie that satisfies the fans (more or less).
I think he showed that when he brought in Spielberg for RotS.
I was bloody serious. Despite my immense respect for his (true) achievements, I believe he has lost his understanding of what fans expect and why they don't like his modern flicks. He needs to get out of his own world and come back to touch with the reality.
#46
Posted 19 June 2009 - 05:59 PM
I was bloody serious. Despite my immense respect for his (true) achievements, I believe he has lost his understanding of what fans expect and why they don't like his modern flicks. He needs to get out of his own world and come back to touch with the reality.
HAHAHAH. That's a nice way of saying you didn't like the prequels.
After all, Indy 4 is just one movie!
#47
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:06 PM
I was bloody serious. Despite my immense respect for his (true) achievements, I believe he has lost his understanding of what fans expect and why they don't like his modern flicks. He needs to get out of his own world and come back to touch with the reality.
HAHAHAH. That's a nice way of saying you didn't like the prequels.
After all, Indy 4 is just one movie!
I like Episode I. I really do.
#48
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:07 PM
I was bloody serious. Despite my immense respect for his (true) achievements, I believe he has lost his understanding of what fans expect and why they don't like his modern flicks. He needs to get out of his own world and come back to touch with the reality.
HAHAHAH. That's a nice way of saying you didn't like the prequels.
After all, Indy 4 is just one movie!
I like Episode I. I really do.
I like all the prequels.
It's just that I love Episode I and (to a degree) Episode III.
#49
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:12 PM
I think the plot must be a prequel from CRYSTAL SKULL. Indy's marriage is an ultimate ending for Indiana Jones (LAST CRUSADE has also a superb ending for the trilogy).
They just have to make Ford younger.
#50
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:15 PM
I think the plot must be a prequel from CRYSTAL SKULL. Indy's marriage is an ultimate ending for Indiana Jones (LAST CRUSADE has also a superb ending for the trilogy).
They just have to make Ford younger.
Maybe it's a backstory of Raiders.
Ford will need LOOOTS of makeup.
#51
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:17 PM
#52
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:40 PM
#53
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:46 PM
-Oscar Wilde
#54
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:47 PM
Not really. THE TEMPLE OF DOOM is set on 1935, one year before RAIDERS (1936) starts. RAIDERS is released on 1981 and three years later TEMPLE OF DOOM. Hypothetically, you can say that TOD is a prequel from RAIDERS! And Ford does not look like older on TOD!I think the plot must be a prequel from CRYSTAL SKULL. Indy's marriage is an ultimate ending for Indiana Jones (LAST CRUSADE has also a superb ending for the trilogy).
They just have to make Ford younger.
I think Indy 5 have to start on 1955, two years before CRYSTAL SKULL. I think you cannot see the differnce from his age.
- John Williams
#55
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:53 PM
No more Russian femme fatales...
#56
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:55 PM
However, you did get me to wonder who they will pit Indiana Jones against....
-Oscar Wilde
#57
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:56 PM
They were just better villains. More fun, too, somehow.
#58
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:57 PM
I want the Nazis back!!
No more Russian femme fatales...
No, we have to have something fresh. This time he will fight against... Arab terrorist.
#59
Posted 19 June 2009 - 06:58 PM
I want the Nazis back!!
No more Russian femme fatales...
No, we have to have something fresh. This time he will fight against... Arab terrorist.
Bwaaahahahah.
Indiana Jones against the Arabs. Maybe they'll bring in Chloey O'Brien too!
#60
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:00 PM
They were just better villains. More fun, too, somehow.
I agree, and I think it is partly because they played into the propaganda serials of World War II (especially in the case of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade).
Hm, for some reason I doubt they would use Russians again...maybe they will stay away from a military force all together?
-Oscar Wilde
#61
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:02 PM
#62
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:03 PM
#63
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:05 PM
#64
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:11 PM
With Lucas it's that way: "Well, there will always be some who won't like it, so why should we bother...?"
Dunno whether you really mean that or just being facetious, but I'm sure GL also wants to make a movie that satisfies the fans (more or less).
I think he showed that when he brought in Spielberg for RotS.
I was bloody serious. Despite my immense respect for his (true) achievements, I believe he has lost his understanding of what fans expect and why they don't like his modern flicks. He needs to get out of his own world and come back to touch with the reality.
Lucas makes independent movies for his own pleasure.
so if you dont like them, he doesnt care.
They were just better villains. More fun, too, somehow.
I agree, and I think it is partly because they played into the propaganda serials of World War II (especially in the case of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade).
Hm, for some reason I doubt they would use Russians again...maybe they will stay away from a military force all together?
they will use some strange cult this time, and the russians will return for the next movie, just like the OT

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#65
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:17 PM
It can't be a prequel to KotCS, as Shia is involved.Not really. THE TEMPLE OF DOOM is set on 1935, one year before RAIDERS (1936) starts. RAIDERS is released on 1981 and three years later TEMPLE OF DOOM. Hypothetically, you can say that TOD is a prequel from RAIDERS! And Ford does not look like older on TOD!I think the plot must be a prequel from CRYSTAL SKULL. Indy's marriage is an ultimate ending for Indiana Jones (LAST CRUSADE has also a superb ending for the trilogy).
They just have to make Ford younger.
I think Indy 5 have to start on 1955, two years before CRYSTAL SKULL. I think you cannot see the differnce from his age.
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#66
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:20 PM
Maybe we'll see the release even next summer!
If they're serious about this, they won't play around with the script for 5 years (let alone 10) this time around.
#67
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:22 PM
Okay ... I don't understand why everybody seems to think the Nazis should be the only villains Indy fights. It's a series of films about adventure and discovery, yet people think he should have the same adversaries every time. Amazing.If you read carefully, I simply said I want the Nazis back.
They were just better villains. More fun, too, somehow.
This sounds as reliable as your feeling that Spielberg wants to make it up to the fans. You know, the sort of tentative statements we're hearing now are the same as the sort that had been made about Crystal Skull as early as about 1995.Hmmmm, I'm somehow getting the feeling that they're gonna speed this thing up.
Maybe we'll see the release even next summer!
If they're serious about this, they won't play around with the script for 5 years (let alone 10) this time around.
#68
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:24 PM
Okay ... I don't understand why everybody seems to think the Nazis should be the only villains Indy fights. It's a series of films about adventure and discovery, yet people think he should have the same adversaries every time. Amazing.If you read carefully, I simply said I want the Nazis back.
They were just better villains. More fun, too, somehow.
It's not every time. ToD, KotCS.
OK, suggest an enemy then. And remember it should have some historical significance.
#69
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:25 PM

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
#70
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:26 PM
Okay ... I don't understand why everybody seems to think the Nazis should be the only villains Indy fights. It's a series of films about adventure and discovery, yet people think he should have the same adversaries every time. Amazing.If you read carefully, I simply said I want the Nazis back.
They were just better villains. More fun, too, somehow.This sounds as reliable as your feeling that Spielberg wants to make it up to the fans. You know, the sort of tentative statements we're hearing now are the same as the sort that had been made about Crystal Skull as early as about 1995.Hmmmm, I'm somehow getting the feeling that they're gonna speed this thing up.
Maybe we'll see the release even next summer!
If they're serious about this, they won't play around with the script for 5 years (let alone 10) this time around.
You're just a contradictory and annoying dude, aren't you? I said I "have a feeling"...
So you have a different feeling. So?
#71
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:31 PM
Figure they get the script off the ground soon and start preproduction this fall, filming in Spring or Summer 2010, then post, then a release in May 2011.
#72
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:32 PM
My prediction for a release date is May 2011.
Figure they get the script off the ground soon and start preproduction this fall, filming in Spring or Summer 2010, then post, then a release in May 2011.
Could be. But I have a feeling Spielberg will release some other movie between now and Tintin. And it won't be in 2011.
#73
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:32 PM
Um ... You stumped me, Josh! I concede to you that there is no other suitable villain in the entire history of the world for Indiana Jones to fight than the Nazis. In the 1950s. Exactly.Okay ... I don't understand why everybody seems to think the Nazis should be the only villains Indy fights. It's a series of films about adventure and discovery, yet people think he should have the same adversaries every time. Amazing.If you read carefully, I simply said I want the Nazis back.
They were just better villains. More fun, too, somehow.
It's not every time. ToD, KotCS.
OK, suggest an enemy then. And remember it should have some historical significance.
#74
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:33 PM
Um ... You stumped me, Josh! I concede to you that there is no other suitable villain in the entire history of the world for Indiana Jones to fight than the Nazis. In the 1950s. Exactly.
Hahahah. Exactly the kind of answer I expected from you.
#75
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:34 PM
#76
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:37 PM
I mean, Frank Marshall saying "we're working on it" might be the same as JW saying "yeah, I wanna to DH."
#77
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:38 PM
My prediction for a release date is May 2011.
Figure they get the script off the ground soon and start preproduction this fall, filming in Spring or Summer 2010, then post, then a release in May 2011.
Could be. But I have a feeling Spielberg will release some other movie between now and Tintin. And it won't be in 2011.
I'm still hoping for Lincoln to fill the gap!
#78
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:39 PM
I'm still hoping for Lincoln to fill the gap!
Maybe Spielberg will release all 3 movies in 2011, just to keep JW on his toes.
#79
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:40 PM
I'm still hoping for Lincoln to fill the gap!
I am starting to doubt it will be made. Steven Spielberg has 50 films in production, it seems, and he gets the rights for a new one every week. I bet he would place higher priority on the Martin Luther King film, as well.
-Oscar Wilde
#80
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:41 PM
I'm still hoping for Lincoln to fill the gap!
I am starting to doubt it will be made. Steven Spielberg has 50 films in production, it seems, and he gets the rights for a new one every week. I bet he would place higher priority on the Martin Luther King film, as well.
Well, he might be working on 50 projects, but I think there are only a handful he actually plans to direct himself.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









