Continue.
#1
Posted 05 August 2011 - 02:43 PM
Vrrrroooooommmmm!
#2
Posted 05 August 2011 - 03:38 PM
Why do Quint and a couple others keep saying that the Reviews forum is where discussions dies? Many threads in there are up to 2 or 3 pages, and feature more discussion about a movie than this thread itself does!
The reviews forum is a good idea, its just that those opposed are being more vocal about their opposition.
People seem to forget that no one ever suggested that all discussion should be moved to the reviews forum. Only that if you feel like writing a long review of a film, that you post your review it to the Reviews forum. And don't forget we encourage book, television, music, and score reviews in that forum as well!
But yea, the general discussion of films that bounce around from film to film that stem from a quick remark that someone recently watch a film will never be moved out. The moderating staff just wants the nicely written, longer reviews that our members generate to be posted there. Thanks!
#3
Posted 05 August 2011 - 03:48 PM
I think having two main threads - one for discussing current movies, and one for discussing older ones - is a great idea!
Why do Quint and a couple others keep saying that the Reviews forum is where discussions dies? Many threads in there are up to 2 or 3 pages, and feature more discussion about a movie than this thread itself does!
The reviews forum is a good idea, its just that those opposed are being more vocal about their opposition.
People seem to forget that no one ever suggested that all discussion should be moved to the reviews forum. Only that if you feel like writing a long review of a film, that you post your review it to the Reviews forum. And don't forget we encourage book, television, music, and score reviews in that forum as well!
But yea, the general discussion of films that bounce around from film to film that stem from a quick remark that someone recently watch a film will never be moved out. The moderating staff just wants the nicely written, longer reviews that our members generate to be posted there. Thanks!
I think it's a great idea too!
#4
Posted 05 August 2011 - 03:54 PM
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#5
Posted 05 August 2011 - 03:55 PM
I think having two main threads - one for discussing current movies, and one for discussing older ones - is a great idea!
I love to hear your motives for saying that. I already said why I think it's a bad idea.
#7
Posted 05 August 2011 - 04:02 PM
#8
Posted 05 August 2011 - 04:04 PM
You will have to go here: http://www.jwfan.com...=1
#9
Posted 05 August 2011 - 04:11 PM
One of the defining characteristics of this message board - an aspect that I truly love - is how any thread can evolve into a discussion of something else entirely, per the flow of discussion.. I would never want that to change, and would never move posts from one movie thread to the other just because the year of the movie being discussed.
#10
Posted 05 August 2011 - 04:16 PM
No, you are not allowed to talk about Morlock in this Thread Alex.
You will have to go here: http://www.jwfan.com...=1
Good one! You should've used the rimshot smiley.
#11
Posted 05 August 2011 - 05:39 PM
I agree. It wouldn't hurt anything to open another thread for current releases - no one would be forced to use it or be forced out if they went off topic.I never said that you wouldn't be allowed to talk about modern movies in the classic movies thread, or that you wouldn't be allowed to talk about classic movies in the modern movies thread.
One of the defining characteristics of this message board - an aspect that I truly love - is how any thread can evolve into a discussion of something else entirely, per the flow of discussion.. I would never want that to change, and would never move posts from one movie thread to the other just because the year of the movie being discussed.
#12
Posted 05 August 2011 - 08:02 PM
It's a pleasant film and I surely prefer this to most summer movies these days. But, to be perfectly honest, it's only a Frankenstein of a movie where everything (and I mean everything) is stitched from different parts of other movies. That's disappointing. The score is good though. Heard only one cue that's not on the album (when they're riding bicycles).
Karol
#13
Posted 05 August 2011 - 08:10 PM
#14
Posted 05 August 2011 - 08:11 PM
Karol
#15
Posted 05 August 2011 - 08:30 PM
#16
Posted 05 August 2011 - 09:51 PM
About Giacchino again: I like how the film is not too heavily scored (at least the first part). It makes more impact that way. That's job well done.
Karol - who thought the best thing about Super 8 was the end credits.
#17
Posted 06 August 2011 - 02:54 AM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#18
Posted 06 August 2011 - 03:08 AM
Isn't that "We'll Fix It in Poste-Haste"?Heard only one cue that's not on the album (when they're riding bicycles).
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#19
Posted 06 August 2011 - 03:24 AM
#20
Posted 06 August 2011 - 03:26 AM
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#21
Posted 06 August 2011 - 04:10 AM
I'm shocked -- I went in expecting a rehashed origin story, but I really enjoyed it. The film actually takes its time developing its characters before moving straight ahead with the action. The superb CGI work by WETA Digital, plus Andy Serkis' performance as Caesar truly elevate this movie. You end up rooting for the apes, who are the most developed characters in the movie, and the ending doesn't really leave room for an immediate sequel. And the action sequences (particularly the climax at the Golden Gate Bridge) are unpredictable and exciting.
Doyle's score isn't anything to sniff at either. I think it's better than his Thor score. A very pleasant surprise, both movie- and score-wise.
#22
Posted 06 August 2011 - 06:01 AM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#23
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:18 AM
#24
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:27 AM
Doyle's score isn't anything to sniff at either. I think it's better than his Thor score. A very pleasant surprise, both movie- and score-wise.
I just listen to it on youtube and it's a generic nightmare of modern blockbuster stylings. Steve Jablonsky delivers more convincing soundscapes.
#25
Posted 06 August 2011 - 07:48 AM
After Stepmom Doyle was like, "Ain't no valley low enough (to which I have to descend musically) to keep me from making sure I'm never rejected again."
Doyle's score isn't anything to sniff at either. I think it's better than his Thor score. A very pleasant surprise, both movie- and score-wise.
I just listen to it on youtube and it's a generic nightmare of modern blockbuster stylings. Steve Jablonsky delivers more convincing soundscapes.
#27
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:24 AM
#28
Posted 06 August 2011 - 08:27 AM

Alex
#30
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:02 AM
Whilst on the subject of lost in the wilderness movies, does anyone recommend any I may have missed? Stuff like The Edge and Rescue Dawn. A fascinating genre, for me.
#32
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:17 AM
#34
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:29 AM
Whilst on the subject of lost in the wilderness movies, does anyone recommend any I may have missed? Stuff like The Edge and Rescue Dawn. A fascinating genre, for me.
Aguirre, The Wrath Of God.
#35
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:31 AM
EDIT: After a quick Google I see it's a Herzog film. A Heart of Darkness adventure. I'll seek it out.
#37
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:37 AM

Alex
#38
Posted 06 August 2011 - 09:42 AM
The Defiant Ones is another superb one.
#39
Posted 06 August 2011 - 05:06 PM
I just listen to it on youtube and it's a generic nightmare of modern blockbuster stylings. Steve Jablonsky delivers more convincing soundscapes.
There's a bit of MV style in the Rise of the Apes score. Bruce Fowler did some orchestrations (plus Zimmer's engineers mixed the score), but it's still better than Jablonsky's work. And the final cue is undeniably Doyle.
#40
Posted 06 August 2011 - 05:23 PM
Oh ho, what happened to it being the next Happening everyone?
I doubt I will find the movie as entertaining as The Happening. Why you eyein' my lemon drink?
After Stepmom Doyle was like, "Ain't no valley low enough (to which I have to descend musically) to keep me from making sure I'm never rejected again."
Doyle's score isn't anything to sniff at either. I think it's better than his Thor score. A very pleasant surprise, both movie- and score-wise.
I just listen to it on youtube and it's a generic nightmare of modern blockbuster stylings. Steve Jablonsky delivers more convincing soundscapes.

Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Movie Talk
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Trek Into Darkness SPOILERS ALLOWED Discussion ThreadStarted by Jason LeBlanc, 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars stand-alone films confirmedStarted by Once, 06 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
New Kubrick DocumentaryStarted by Alexcremers, 04 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014 film directed by Bryan Singer)Started by Matt C, 27 Jan 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars Episode VII (Directed by JJ Abrams)Started by crocodile, 24 Jan 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











