Actually it is not so much about how great or bad My Heart Will Go On is, it is about over exposure and being all tired and burned out by it. Also I find it somewhat cloying.It's a great belter of a song!
Some people take things way to seriously
#2201
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:51 AM
Ars superior est vita hominum.
"We pop out and come into the world and music is there. We didn't invent it - it's all organised in the atmosphere by divinity or whatever. It's a miracle." - John Williams-
I think music is a stream of some kind. It could be blood. It could be water. It could be ether. Whatever it is it seems to be a living, organic force that’s in motion, that serves humanity and is part of humanity and part of what describes us as humans. We sing, play, dance, all the things that we do. And there is a vibrant and great literature we have been given. ... As musicians, we join the stream. We swim in the stream with all the other millions of music makers. It’s a life force, a strong one, surrounding us and we are part of it. -John Williams-
#2202
Posted 30 April 2012 - 12:28 PM
Titanic is a good film. A very good film at its better moments. The script is uneven, with the love story somewhat meandering between pulled off rather well and overly cheesy. I understand that having it was necessary to give the second half the emotional impact it required, and it fully succeeds at that. I also like how its used to give a panorama of early 20th century society in the first half of the film. A couple of the specific scenes, as I recall, are too cheesy in an ultra Hollywood way. And I'll never get used to the painfully cheese dripping framing story, which wouldn't have been necessary for the film to work in the slightest, and at least for me completely ruins the ending. At its best moments in its second half, the film, without taking you out of the story, feels like watching a documentary. And *that's* pretty impressive.
Horner's score in the second half works very well and does a lot for the film. I don't get all that much out of it on CD, but it's certainly fine. The main moments in the first half, on the other hand, are mostly based on that synth choir pseudo Enya stuff. They should have just hired Enya. I like Book of Days, which was clearly what Horner was trying to copy. But his version of it sounds like a three year old sitting in front of a children's synth keyboard for the first time in his life and trying to play the Enya song. It seriously hurts several of the film's bigger scenes for me and may easily be the reason why many people find the film cheesier than it is and, not being as aware of film music as we are, go after the script instead.
By the way, I absolutely wanted to see it in 3D, but they only had evening showings of the undubbed version for one week here. Very annoying.
#2203
Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:08 PM
Given the crass RCP-leanings of AVATAR's score, we still got lucky with TITANIC. It may copy Enya badly, but at least it's a Horner original not soundung like warmed-over Bruckheimer.
#2204
Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:13 PM
#2205
Posted 30 April 2012 - 02:48 PM
that song is just terrible. but then it's bryan adams....gag.Did Bryan Adams ruin Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves for you as well?
Karol
#2206
Posted 30 April 2012 - 03:35 PM
#2207
Posted 30 April 2012 - 04:48 PM
#2208
Posted 30 April 2012 - 05:14 PM
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#2209
Posted 30 April 2012 - 07:57 PM
Lol at Merkel call the script vulgar without an ounce of reasoning behind his comment.
in other words be specific.
Cardboard characters, cliche situations, lousy dialogue, black and white roles. The movie could be without dialogue and it would still work, That's a statement of great directing. But the screenplay doesn't elevate the movie in the any way. Cameron has always been a lousy writer
#2210
Posted 30 April 2012 - 07:59 PM
you're just repeating what someone else repeated from someone else without an ounce of originalty or personal thought. How weak. You fail to make one point stick. If anything is vulgar it's your baseless criticism without the backing a single statement with actual points.
Lol at Merkel call the script vulgar without an ounce of reasoning behind his comment.
in other words be specific.
Cardboard characters, cliche situations, lousy dialogue, black and white roles. The movie could be without dialogue and it would still work, That's a statement of great directing. But the screenplay doesn't elevate the movie in the any way. Cameron has always been a lousy writer
come on Merkel you can do better. Here let me help
Zane was a cad with little dimension.
The dialogue was too modern,
No one flipped the bird in 1912.
The acting was stilted, no one stood out.
Of course none of the 4 statements are accurate.
#2211
Posted 30 April 2012 - 08:15 PM
No one flipped the bird in 1912.
...
Of course none of the 4 statements are accurate.
Indeed.

1886, by the way.
#2212
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:12 PM
you're just repeating what someone else repeated from someone else without an ounce of originalty or personal thought. How weak. You fail to make one point stick. If anything is vulgar it's your baseless criticism without the backing a single statement with actual points.
Lol at Merkel call the script vulgar without an ounce of reasoning behind his comment.
in other words be specific.
Cardboard characters, cliche situations, lousy dialogue, black and white roles. The movie could be without dialogue and it would still work, That's a statement of great directing. But the screenplay doesn't elevate the movie in the any way. Cameron has always been a lousy writer
come on Merkel you can do better. Here let me help
Zane was a cad with little dimension.
The dialogue was too modern,
No one flipped the bird in 1912.
The acting was stilted, no one stood out.
Of course none of the 4 statements are accurate.
I'm sorry, Joe, I'm a lousy critic and can do little else besides repeating critiscism clichés (and I really mean that). I as cliched a writer as Cameron himself
#2213
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:17 PM
Cameron has always been a lousy writer
I was fine with everything else you said, it's your opinion, but the last part irked me, as it always does. That's because it's fucking bullshit.
Seriously, Cameron co-wrote three of the greatest and most important sci-fi movies of the twentieth century and some little cretin on the internet claims he's a lousy writer? Get out of it! To this day, Aliens alone remains one of the - if not THE most quotable movie ever made; and you call its writer lousy. Yeah, right. What - you think a bunch of marines swearing at each other and waving dicks about doesn't constitute good, memorable writing? It's not sofisticated enough? You think that's all there is to it? You're wrong. That script is one of the wittiest, sharpest and thoroughly gripping war yarns ever. An utterly authentic boys own adventure set in space, worded with panache and an absolute hunger to entertain. Almost every single line is pure gold, indeed: that script is an outright icon of the genre and here you are calling its writer lousy. Lol
#2214
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:20 PM
#2215
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:24 PM
#2216
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:25 PM
#2217
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:29 PM
#2218
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:29 PM
I don't mind you having that opinion, I just wanted you to back it up. We all have opinions we can't I know that but with Titanic I know you well enough over the years with your posting that you could be more precise.I entitled to have wrong opinions, I do it far too often, but I don't think being called a cretin was called for...
but after Quint's last couple of post all I can say about this subject is GAME OVER MAN, GAME OVER.
btw I must say that in Titanic I love the line "I'd rather be his whore than your wife". Man don't you know when you've been insulted and you've struggled for a great retort and none is forthcoming only to have several hours pass before you come up with one but the moments passed, well all I can say is good for you Rose.
#2219
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:30 PM
#2220
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:31 PM
#2221
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:34 PM
Karol
#2222
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:39 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#2223
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:40 PM
#2224
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:40 PM
Depends on how you define spectacle. Avatar is no better than Transformers to me. It has action and special effects galore, but it lacks everything else necessary to make a good film.
Oh I don't know, for me there is a big difference between those. I don't like either of them, but at least Cameron knows how to orchestrate a big blockbuster.
That's the analogy there: he's not a great composer, but terrific orchestrator.
Karol
#2225
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:46 PM
I didn't say script doesn't play a role. But it's very simple most of the time, stripped to its core almost.
Karol
Deceptively simple, yes. Supremely economical and comprehensively efficient is what they are. These are thrillers, after all. Maybe this is why I find Cameron the perfect antidote to someone like Chris Nolan.
#2226
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:48 PM
Karol
#2227
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:48 PM
#2228
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:49 PM
#2229
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:50 PM
#2230
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:52 PM
but I didn't.
#2231
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:53 PM
Karol
#2232
Posted 30 April 2012 - 09:56 PM
#2233
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:00 PM
Karol
#2234
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:03 PM
#2235
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:11 PM
Karol
#2236
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:21 PM
In the end, you'll bow before Nolan!
Karol
no, dislike memento, the prestige, insomnia and batman begins, did I leave anything out. I loved TDK.
I think Nolan leaves much to be desired when it come to action, but he's a decent visual storyteller
#2237
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:24 PM
Nolan is best when he's doing his own thing, although Insomnia is a remake.
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#2238
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:27 PM
The Cabin in the Woods- I'm not a horror aficionado, but I am a huge Joss Whedon fanboy, and I was thoroughly satisfied. Big congrats to Whedon/JJ Abrams protoge Drew Goddard, who actually directed it, for nailing his first feature.
Mission Impossibe IV- Eh. Kick ass Giacchino score. The movie was in parts engaging, in parts tedious. The whole Kremlin sequence was good, and the double impersonation meetings in the Dubai hotel was extremely well done. Simon Pegg remains one of the most entertaining men in the world, no matter what he's doing.
#2239
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:28 PM
Karol
#2240
Posted 30 April 2012 - 10:45 PM
I forgot about that; haven't seen it. Robert Rodriguez's early TV movie Roadracers just got released on Blu, maybe this isn't too far off.You forgot about Following. A iterally no-budget black & white 70-minute film noir, shot on weekends with amateur group of friends (who all worked full time as well) over a year, I think. They didn't get enough film to shoot second takes so everything was rehearsed to death. It has already all the elements of his style and as such is very impressive.
Karol
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Movie Talk
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Trek Into Darkness SPOILERS ALLOWED Discussion ThreadStarted by Jason LeBlanc, 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars stand-alone films confirmedStarted by Once, 06 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
New Kubrick DocumentaryStarted by Alexcremers, 04 Feb 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014 film directed by Bryan Singer)Started by Matt C, 27 Jan 2013 |
|
|
||
Upcoming Films
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Wars Episode VII (Directed by JJ Abrams)Started by crocodile, 24 Jan 2013 |
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









