The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 Reboot film)
#1
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:21 PM
A high res picture of the new Spider-Man suit.
http://www.deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Spiderman2012_0911.jpg
I still think it looks ugly compared to the Maguire version.
#3
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:22 PM
I still think it looks ugly compared to the Maguire version.
#4
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:25 PM
#5
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:31 PM
At least he has artificial web shooters this time
I always thought it made much more sense for the web shooters to be organic. I mean, he's a spider mutant, why wouldn't he also inherit the ability to organically produce webs? The artificial web shooters always were one of the most stupidest things in the comics, IMHO
#6
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:40 PM
At least he has artificial web shooters this time
I always thought it made much more sense for the web shooters to be organic. I mean, he's a spider mutant, why wouldn't he also inherit the ability to organically produce webs? The artificial web shooters always were one of the most stupidest things in the comics, IMHO
I guess, unless you actually build a storyline about their existence. I don't read Spider-Man so I don't know.
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#7
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:51 PM
#8
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:52 PM
#9
Posted 14 February 2011 - 10:59 PM
They're to help illustrate that he's a genius.
Mm, I don't like that.
And to provide tension (running out of web cartridges etc).
Mm, I like that.
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#10
Posted 14 February 2011 - 11:46 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#11
Posted 14 February 2011 - 11:55 PM
John Williams sucks, he doesn't write with a quill pen, there is no emotion in pencil music ! Purcell is the man !Among all the things I have done in my short and pitiful life, becoming an inside joke on JWFAN is the one I'm the least proud of.
#12
Posted 15 February 2011 - 12:07 AM
Great title, great suit, great director, great actor... composer?
I have to disagree on those two. The suit just looks... off. And the title, while a mainstay in the comic books, just sounds silly.
#13
Posted 15 February 2011 - 01:55 AM
#15
Posted 15 February 2011 - 02:42 AM
#16
Posted 15 February 2011 - 02:54 AM
#17
Posted 15 February 2011 - 05:32 AM
I liked the organic webshooters in the context that Raimi was creating a metaphor for sexual awakening.
Seriously? The first Spider-Man film is littered with parallels to puberty. Peter Parker notices the lovely Mary-Jane and is taking her photo... when a GM Spider bites him. He wakes the next morning to find new muscle growth, hair in places that didn't have hair before, and secretes a sticky white substance which he has trouble controlling. It's hardly subtle.
#18
Posted 15 February 2011 - 06:04 AM
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#19
Posted 15 February 2011 - 06:06 AM
#20
Posted 15 February 2011 - 06:07 AM
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#21
Posted 15 February 2011 - 11:52 PM
#22
Posted 15 February 2011 - 11:54 PM
All of a sudden I'm mildly interested in this film.Having artificial web shooters as a plot device means he can legitimately run out of webbing instead of just losing his mojo like in the Raimi film.
#23
Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:08 AM
At least he has artificial web shooters this time
I always thought it made much more sense for the web shooters to be organic. I mean, he's a spider mutant, why wouldn't he also inherit the ability to organically produce webs? The artificial web shooters always were one of the most stupidest things in the comics, IMHO
The spinnerets -- silk-producing organs -- of most* spiders are located on the underside of a spider's abdomen, to the rear.
That is counterproductive to the method of fast-moving forward locomotion that Spider-Man uses in the comic books.
Personally, I'm glad that Peter Parker didn't inherit the compound eyes, eight legs, need to liquefy insects to eat them, and desire to mate with and be eaten by a large female that other spiders get. Gotta draw the line at "spider mutant" somewhere. Save that craziness for Seth Brundle.
I don't know about you, but if Peter Parker produces a pile of silk in his underpants, I don't want to know about it.
Maybe he does, and he had to build the web spinners as compensation. Raimi's Peter Parker is never really developed as a science whiz.
* One spider, the zebra tarantula (Aphonopelma seemanni), has silk-producing organs on its feet.
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
#24
Posted 16 February 2011 - 09:00 AM
#25
Posted 16 February 2011 - 11:59 AM
Karol
#26
Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:07 PM
I'd like to see some detective work in a Batman movie. The first four discarded the idea wrom a get-go. It's better in the new films, but what still this is not it.
Karol
Which is another reason why the animated series kills all.
#27
Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:11 PM
Karol
#28
Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:11 PM
It's the same with other characters. Take the Green Lanterns. They're way better in a Star Wars-like saga with a lot of weird stuff that being on Earth catching criminals by Earth's laws (boooring).
Izena duen guztia omen da.
#29
Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:20 PM
This might be true, actually. I re-watched some episodes and this is still excellent. Of course, I mean the early episodes, with no Robin, Nightwing and newer storylines. The Man-Bat stuff, Clayface and such.
Karol
See, a lot of people have something against Robin, but he was pretty well done in the series. Check out 'Robin's Reckoning', or 'Growing Pains'.
One of the best episodes also came at the end of the run, 'Mad Love', which looks at Harley Quinn's origin and is spectacularly good.
#30
Posted 16 February 2011 - 12:48 PM
Karol
#31
Posted 14 July 2011 - 06:43 PM
Karol
#32
Posted 14 July 2011 - 06:51 PM
Is that supposed to be Dr. Connors on the last pic ? Did we have a confirmation on whose gonna be the villain in this one ?
P.S.: This isn't a replacement. It's another chapter. Yeah, that's probably why they call it a reboot.
#35
Posted 14 July 2011 - 06:59 PM
#36
Posted 14 July 2011 - 09:19 PM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
#37
Posted 14 July 2011 - 09:28 PM
- Patrick Bateman on the Maestro
#39
Posted 15 July 2011 - 03:47 PM
#40
Posted 15 July 2011 - 03:48 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












