Recording "live" vs. separate recording sessions
#1
Posted 24 February 2012 - 07:25 PM
What do you guys think? Is there a noticeable difference between the two for you?
#2
Posted 24 February 2012 - 07:55 PM
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#3
Posted 24 February 2012 - 08:21 PM
#5
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:42 PM
I also like the bad edits when they splice takes. It just adds a flavor that I have always liked, even when I didn't realize they were bad.
#6
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:46 PM
For instance, the marimba is tuned to 444 Hz instead of 440 like other instruments.
440 Hz? Where?
#7
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:46 PM
That's the first time I hear this
#9
Posted 24 February 2012 - 09:53 PM
Also, writing music with that in mind ensures that it can be performed live later on - at least to a degree. Miking and amplification can still be an issue, of course; just look at how difficult it is to perform Shore's LOTR scores in a concert hall - most solos plus the choir are amplified, and half of the time the whole affair still runs a high risk of being off balance.
Still, if a composer writes a piece intending it to be performed in one setting, at least a basic "performability" is built in from the start.
#10
Posted 24 February 2012 - 10:00 PM
Good question. A lot of the playing on JW's film scores is sloppy which makes it more interesting to me. It's a good thing. Some say JW is a bad conductor but I like the imperfection.
Uhhhm....where did you get that from? Williams conducting and sloppy recording don't go together....DOES NOT COMPUTE
Music Muse Reviews: "Escape From Tomorrow by Abel Korzeniowski
#11
Posted 24 February 2012 - 10:07 PM
In America. In fact I think the reason the marimba is tuned to 444 is because of European influence. Which is problematic for film music since most film scores are recorded in America.
For instance, the marimba is tuned to 444 Hz instead of 440 like other instruments.
440 Hz? Where?
1. Nightwatch/Killer By Night - Johnny Williams and Quincy Jones 2. Diamond Head/Gone with the Wave - Johnny Williams/Lalo Schifrin 3. Mass - Leonard Bernstein 4. Bernstein with the New York Philharmonic - Leonard Bernstein
#12
Posted 24 February 2012 - 10:18 PM
#13
Posted 25 February 2012 - 04:08 AM
In America. In fact I think the reason the marimba is tuned to 444 is because of European influence. Which is problematic for film music since most film scores are recorded in America.
I read only 30% of film scores today are recorded in L.A.. The other 70% are nonunion musicians in Seattle, Europe, Russia, Australia...
#14
Posted 25 February 2012 - 12:57 PM
#15
Posted 25 February 2012 - 02:48 PM
Good question. A lot of the playing on JW's film scores is sloppy which makes it more interesting to me. It's a good thing. Some say JW is a bad conductor but I like the imperfection.
I also like the bad edits when they splice takes. It just adds a flavor that I have always liked, even when I didn't realize they were bad.
99% of conductors who conduct John's music they make his compositions sound boring, dull and sloppy, John is an exeptionally great conductor. He has a unic feel and phrasing which breaths life into his music.
His recordings aren't sloppy, they are 'human'. In my eyes are perfect.
And to get to the point of this thread, recording individually is a crap idea. The process sucks out the life of orchestral recordings. Here is an idea, producers should get their finger out and pay proper orchestras to record their scores instead of opting out for nightmare orchestras so they can save money.
#16
Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:13 PM
Good question. A lot of the playing on JW's film scores is sloppy which makes it more interesting to me. It's a good thing. Some say JW is a bad conductor but I like the imperfection.
I also like the bad edits when they splice takes. It just adds a flavor that I have always liked, even when I didn't realize they were bad.
99% of conductors who conduct John's music they make his compositions sound boring, dull and sloppy, John is an exeptionally great conductor. He has a unic feel and phrasing which breaths life into his music.
His recordings aren't sloppy, they are 'human'. In my eyes are perfect.
And to get to the point of this thread, recording individually is a crap idea. The process sucks out the life of orchestral recordings. Here is an idea, producers should get their finger out and pay proper orchestras to record their scores instead of opting out for nightmare orchestras so they can save money.
Pretty much sums up my whole opinion on the issues addressed by this post
Music Muse Reviews: "Escape From Tomorrow by Abel Korzeniowski
#17
Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:13 AM
In my opinion it is also a musical shortcut, since things which can happen in striping sessions, cannot happen in non striping sessions.
In closing it is an evolutionary move to recording becoming more like sequencing. Some composers just need to have control over everything. Powell being the best example, and it certainly delivers.
#18
Posted 26 February 2012 - 02:19 PM
It also allows the Brass and Percussion to play out full and not hold back, which really allows the music to compete with the epic soundtracks being delivered from the sound fx team.
Dynamic compression done live...
#20
Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:05 PM
I don't see what difference it would make for well trained musicians.
1) Playing solo vs playing with an ensemble is a completely different experience. Trained or not, there's a lot of emotion and group dynamics involved in a live performance. You can't really simulate that.
2) Re InTheCity's comment above, playing at full volume and playing pianissimo isn't just a matter of volume but mainly a matter of character. A good orchestration should allow the instruments to play the way they're meant to.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












