Terminator 5 and 6
#1
Posted 08 June 2012 - 09:57 PM
http://www.moviehole...-for-2013-start
#3
Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:05 PM
#4
Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:13 PM
#5
Posted 08 June 2012 - 10:19 PM
#6
Posted 08 June 2012 - 11:20 PM
#7
Posted 09 June 2012 - 01:03 AM
#8
Posted 09 June 2012 - 01:13 AM
#9
Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:58 AM
#10
Posted 09 June 2012 - 03:59 AM
#11
Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:24 AM
#12
Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:45 AM
#13
Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:47 AM
Karol
#14
Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:53 AM
It does follow Salvation although some of the producers and franchise owner were not to happy about the job McG did with it but they felt it was good enough to continue on and they want the fifth and sixth installments to be the closing of the franchise...
...before deciding to shoot the seventh, eighth and ninth installment too, because they thought there were some ideas that were not explored in the previous films.
Nah, it was allowed. I like it. After many failed attempts earlier, the android achieved a believable humanity right in his final moment.
While I like it too, I do agree with Cremers about it being corny.
And no, the android didn't achieve a believable humanity. he was just replicating something he was asked by Connor to do. He was just following orders. He's just a fucking machine.
I wish someone once wrote an original script for a blocbuster, which is not a reboot, sequel, prequel or a tribute, or even tied to any known piece of merchendising. That I would watch gladly.
Karol
So, you ain't gonna watch The Hobbit, right?
'Forget the notes!' - Hans Zimmer, June 2013
#15
Posted 09 June 2012 - 07:55 AM
Karol
#16
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:32 AM
I wish someone once wrote an original script for a blocbuster, which is not a reboot, sequel, prequel or a tribute, or even tied to any known piece of merchendising. That I would watch gladly.
Karol
Well, we had that Avatar film a few years ago...
#17
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:37 AM
Nah, it was allowed. I like it. After many failed attempts earlier, the android achieved a believable humanity right in his final moment.
Nope. That wasn't the reason for the thumbs up.
#18
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:40 AM
I have a bad feelings about The Hobbit. Mark my words.
Karol
Duly noted.
I wish someone once wrote an original script for a blocbuster, which is not a reboot, sequel, prequel or a tribute, or even tied to any known piece of merchendising. That I would watch gladly.
Karol
Well, we had that Avatar film a few years ago...
'Forget the notes!' - Hans Zimmer, June 2013
#19
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:44 AM
It's one film (well, this an Inception). Everything else, however...
I wish someone once wrote an original script for a blocbuster, which is not a reboot, sequel, prequel or a tribute, or even tied to any known piece of merchendising. That I would watch gladly.
Karol
Well, we had that Avatar film a few years ago...
Karol
#20
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:48 AM
I have a bad feelings about The Hobbit. Mark my words.
But why? I mean, you have the famous book (it's not some writer from Lost), you have Peter Jackson ... it can't go wrong, right?
#21
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:50 AM
Not surprising... well at least with Arnold back in the mix they maybe good. Terminator Salvation had some parts to it that were good but over all stunk. I know most didn't like Terminator 3 Rise Of The Machines but I enjoyed it.
Agree totally. T3 was the best of the first three IMO, with the best music, cinematography, development, women and production design. It also had a light feel to it that I enjoyed, while still being enough ominous and faithful to T1 and T2.
#22
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:53 AM
T3 was the best of the first three IMO,
That's a strange opinion. Almost like saying The Batlle Of Endor is the best Star Wars movie. Surely everybody can see that the storytelling isn't up to par with Cameron's. To me Rise Of The Machines was a typical straight-to-video movie.
#23
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:36 AM
Let me guess: they'll try to kill Connor in this one. Am I right? Hey, I get a cookie!
It does follow Salvation although some of the producers and franchise owner were not to happy about the job McG did with it but they felt it was good enough to continue on and they want the fifth and sixth installments to be the closing of the franchise...
...before deciding to shoot the seventh, eighth and ninth installment too, because they thought there were some ideas that were not explored in the previous films.Nah, it was allowed. I like it. After many failed attempts earlier, the android achieved a believable humanity right in his final moment.
While I like it too, I do agree with Cremers about ti being corny.
And no, the android didn't achieve a believable humanity. he was just replicating something he was asked by Connor to do. He was just following orders. He's just a fucking machine.
How dull. Sorry, I don't have the same coldly clinical outlook on the movies as you.
Of course it's corny. Apparently that's a bad thing in your world.
#24
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:39 AM
T3 was the best of the first three IMO,
That's a strange opinion. Almost like saying The Batlle Of Endor is the best Star Wars movie. Surely everybody can see that the storytelling isn't up to par with Cameron's. To me Rise Of The Machines was a typical straight-to-video movie.
I hear it more often...apparantly I have a different look on movies than most people. My taste is often opposite to the IMDB trend.
#25
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:42 AM
But like others, I'm worried how they're going to justify Arnold's advanced age. Robots don't age, do they? This was already an issue with T3. But maybe they'll be able to write in an explanation somehow.
#26
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:47 AM
Sorry, I don't have the same coldly clinical outlook on the movies as you.
Of course it's corny. You make that seem like a bad thing.
I said I like it. I like corny. Corny isn't a bad thing.
But that whole "the machine achieves some humanity" bullshit still is bullshit.
'Forget the notes!' - Hans Zimmer, June 2013
#27
Posted 09 June 2012 - 10:15 AM
~Renovia
Ah music, a magic beyond all we do here. ~ Albus Dumbledore
#28
Posted 09 June 2012 - 10:15 AM
Sorry, I don't have the same coldly clinical outlook on the movies as you.
Of course it's corny. You make that seem like a bad thing.
I said I like it. I like corny. Corny isn't a bad thing.
But that whole "the machine achieves some humanity" bullshit still is bullshit.
Depressing.
You're reading me and it far too literally.
#29
Posted 09 June 2012 - 11:03 AM
- George Lucas
#30
Posted 09 June 2012 - 11:06 AM
This film should be a prequel or something. Or they could kill John Connor. But I don't think this is better than the last film.
Both 3 and 4 were prequels.
#31
Posted 09 June 2012 - 11:15 AM
Sorry, I don't have the same coldly clinical outlook on the movies as you.
Of course it's corny. You make that seem like a bad thing.
I said I like it. I like corny. Corny isn't a bad thing.
But that whole "the machine achieves some humanity" bullshit still is bullshit.
Depressing.
You're reading me and it far too literally.
Well, my bad, I guess.
This film should be a prequel or something. Or they could kill John Connor. But I don't think this is better than the last film.
Both 3 and 4 were prequels.
No, they were sequ... No, you're right, they were prequ... No, wait! They were pre-sequels. Or se-prequels. I'm not sure anymore.
'Forget the notes!' - Hans Zimmer, June 2013
#32
Posted 09 June 2012 - 11:29 AM
But that whole "the machine achieves some humanity" bullshit still is bullshit.
It is.
It's corny because, ultimately, it's an ending that doesn't want to depress certain viewers who sympathize with the character. Some would call that a Hollywood copout. I would've like it better without it.
#33
Posted 09 June 2012 - 11:32 AM
This film should be a prequel or something. Or they could kill John Connor. But I don't think this is better than the last film.
Both 3 and 4 were prequels.
And the previous films are prequels as well
- George Lucas
#34
Posted 09 June 2012 - 12:04 PM
But that whole "the machine achieves some humanity" bullshit still is bullshit.
It is.
It's corny because, ultimately, it's an ending that doesn't want to depress certain viewers who sympathize with the character. Some would call that a Hollywood copout. I would've like it better without it.
I disagree. I think it's harmless. I expect that's because I'm a romantic, it colours my approach and judgement of movies - not all movies - but entertainments like T2 yes, very much so. The Terminator's 'fascination' with human behaviour becomes a clear theme in the second half of the movie, so my 'cosy' theory is a valid one. You may not like it, but it's just tough isn't it. Now I'm not saying Arnie becomes so human in the end that he wants to have a pet dog and sit down with his family to watch The Waltons, but the idea that the android made, right at the end of its service, a connection with John is absolutely hinted at by the way of a universally recognised humanistic gesture. Again, it's harmless.
So it's corny, oh well boo hoo for the miserable fuckers in the audience who want a Kubrickian bleakness at the end of every damn movie they watch. I love that by the way, but not every bleeding time without fail.
#35
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:39 PM
#36
Posted 09 June 2012 - 08:53 PM
#37
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:01 PM
#38
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:04 PM
I'm sorry Roald but T4 WAS awful. I like to call that movie TINO. It was anything but a terminator movie in my eyes. At least T3 was entertaining. and was a good popcorn movie that's it. T4 was just crap from start to finish, imo.
Hey, I didn't say it's my favorite movie of anything like that. But the movie was not 'awful'. Thought it was an interesting twist on the concept after having seen two quasi-remakes of the The Terminator already (T2 and T3).
#39
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:07 PM
In fact, none of the entries in the TERMINATOR universe have been outright bad....they've all had stuff going for them, including the SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES.
#40
Posted 09 June 2012 - 09:11 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












