Jump to content


Photo

Alien (1979) Vs Aliens (1986)

Ridley Scott VS James Cameron

  • Please log in to reply
242 replies to this topic

Poll: Alien (1979) Vs Aliens (1986) (38 member(s) have cast votes)

Are you singular or plural?

  1. Alien (1979) - Ridley Scott (25 votes [65.79%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 65.79%

  2. Aliens (1986) - James Cameron (13 votes [34.21%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 34.21%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#121 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 03:23 PM

Gotta go with Alien, it was my first R rated movie I saw.


Me too! An amazing frightening experience because I didn't know it was a sci-fi horror flick.
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#122 Chaac

Chaac

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8594 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 16 June 2012 - 03:32 PM


Come to think of it I don't think I actually care about films suggesting me new things every time.


Well, how can you value it if you never experienced it?


What I mean is that I never looked for it.

If something has several interpretations I get more or less it all seeing it once or twice, or simply thinking about it. Plus I have good visual memory so I remember what a film was like.

#123 chuckster312

chuckster312

    Frequent Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1997 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 16 June 2012 - 04:08 PM


Gotta go with Alien, it was my first R rated movie I saw.


Me too! An amazing frightening experience because I didn't know it was a sci-fi horror flick.


You might be thinking it's a light - hearted family adventure with flying bicycles, huh?

If you put John Williams in a dryer, you get Jerry Goldsmith! You get the downside version!


#124 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 04:18 PM

If something has several interpretations I get more or less it all seeing it once or twice, or simply thinking about it. Plus I have good visual memory so I remember what a film was like.


It doesn't really work that way, Chaac. Watching movies, evaluating art in general, is a dynamic process. New personal richness and different stages in life can lead to different views, insights and outlook. You're a young guy, right?



Gotta go with Alien, it was my first R rated movie I saw.


Me too! An amazing frightening experience because I didn't know it was a sci-fi horror flick.


You might be thinking it's a light - hearted family adventure with flying bicycles, huh?


To tell you the truth, I was expecting James Bond in space :o . Heck, I don't even remember why but you have to remember that there was no virtually no information at that time. It was the dark ages. I loved Star Wars and I was very much into science fiction so I had to see Alien, even though I was too young.
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#125 Chaac

Chaac

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8594 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 16 June 2012 - 04:27 PM


If something has several interpretations I get more or less it all seeing it once or twice, or simply thinking about it. Plus I have good visual memory so I remember what a film was like.


It doesn't really work that way, Chaac. Watching movies, evaluating art in general, is a dynamic process. New personal richness and different stages in life can lead to different views, insights and outlook. You're a young guy, right?


Yes, but I know that, I've experienced it. A lot.

As for art my opinions usually tend to change for the worse.

#126 Koray Savas

Koray Savas

    Grandest Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 16 June 2012 - 08:48 PM

Wait, you don't like movies that give you something more each time you watch them?

In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.


#127 nightscape94

nightscape94

    The Goggles Do Nothing!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4233 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:USA

Posted 16 June 2012 - 08:51 PM

Sorry, absolutely no contest on this one. Alien is a masterpiece, Aliens is a great action movie.

#128 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:45 PM

Wait, you don't like movies that give you something more each time you watch them?


I think he cornered himself, which is bound to happen when you always saying the exact opposite.
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#129 Joey

Joey

    I am the First of many

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23203 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not Arizona

Posted 16 June 2012 - 10:54 PM

Aliens is writen in that way consciously and then subverts it. The marines end up being useless, Hudson cries around, and Ripley is the ultimate badass. The final confrontantion is a confrontation of mothers.

Are you serious, what a stupid comment, really stupid.

The final confrontation between the mothers doesn't happen if the marines are useless.

#130 E.T. & Elliott

E.T. & Elliott

    SUPERVISED AND APPROVED BY JOHN WILLIAMS

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5859 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amazing Stories neighborhood, CA

Posted 16 June 2012 - 11:55 PM

Have you all been through the Alien scene on The Great Movie Ride at Disney World? It's one of the coolest things to experience on this planet.
Posted Image

#131 Chaac

Chaac

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8594 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 17 June 2012 - 02:51 AM

Wait, you don't like movies that give you something more each time you watch them?


I didn't say that. I said it doesn't usually happen to me.


Aliens is writen in that way consciously and then subverts it. The marines end up being useless, Hudson cries around, and Ripley is the ultimate badass. The final confrontantion is a confrontation of mothers.

Are you serious, what a stupid comment, really stupid.

The final confrontation between the mothers doesn't happen if the marines are useless.


They were wiped out by the aliens. We can safely say it didn't work out well. Pirric victory.

#132 Koray Savas

Koray Savas

    Grandest Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 17 June 2012 - 04:54 AM


Wait, you don't like movies that give you something more each time you watch them?


I didn't say that. I said it doesn't usually happen to me.

The getting more part? You don't find more to appreciate, more subtle details and nuances you didn't pick up before, or anything like that, with your favorite films?

In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.


#133 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21550 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 17 June 2012 - 08:05 AM



Holy crap how did I miss this? That just blew my socks off, I've never seen footage of anything like this. And a seriously good performance, too; not LSO standards but damn, they nailed it.

Horner is the laziest bastard in scoring, but the guy is just ridiculously talented and an absolute master of action music. 4:48 - the way he signs off the cue with impending doom, the piano signalling the "futile" attempts at escape, death closing in. It's terrifying stuff and absolutely marvellous film score.

#134 crocodile

crocodile

    A part-time Horner apologist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10305 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:River of Nile

Posted 17 June 2012 - 08:07 AM

You should have listened to it live, Quint. It makes quite an impression. This and Bishop's Countdown. The performance I heard was even better than this one.

Karol
From a storytelling point of view, from a directing point of view, there is one thing I associate with what he does, which is calm. There is such an inherent calm and inherent trust of the one powerful image, that he makes me embarrassed with my own work, in terms of how many different shots, how many different sound effects, how many different things we’ll throw at an audience to make an impression. But with Kubrick, there is such a great trust of the one correct image to calmly explain something to audience. There can be some slowness to the editing. There’s nothing frenetic about it. It’s very simple. There’s a trust in simple storytelling and simple image making that actually takes massive confidence to try and emulate. - Christopher Nolan

#135 Incanus

Incanus

    The One True John Williams Believer, Keeper of the Faith

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 12172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Finland the fierce land of polar bears and penguins

Posted 17 June 2012 - 08:41 AM

Well I wish there were concerts around here to perform this stuff. Exhilarating and I always love to see the orchestra at work as you can really see and hear in the live performance more clearly all the layers that make into creating these pieces of music.

Ars superior est vita hominum.

"We pop out and come into the world and music is there. We didn't invent it - it's all organised in the atmosphere by divinity or whatever. It's a miracle." - John Williams-

I think music is a stream of some kind. It could be blood. It could be water. It could be ether. Whatever it is it seems to be a living, organic force that’s in motion, that serves humanity and is part of humanity and part of what describes us as humans. We sing, play, dance, all the things that we do. And there is a vibrant and great literature we have been given. ... As musicians, we join the stream. We swim in the stream with all the other millions of music makers. It’s a life force, a strong one, surrounding us and we are part of it. -John Williams-


#136 Joey

Joey

    I am the First of many

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23203 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Not Arizona

Posted 17 June 2012 - 07:28 PM


Wait, you don't like movies that give you something more each time you watch them?


I didn't say that. I said it doesn't usually happen to me.


Aliens is writen in that way consciously and then subverts it. The marines end up being useless, Hudson cries around, and Ripley is the ultimate badass. The final confrontantion is a confrontation of mothers.

Are you serious, what a stupid comment, really stupid.

The final confrontation between the mothers doesn't happen if the marines are useless.


They were wiped out by the aliens. We can safely say it didn't work out well. Pirric victory.

yes they were all killed except for one, but without them Ripley dies early on...so does poor newt.

#137 MrJosh

MrJosh

    Regular Poster

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 480 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Idaho

Posted 18 June 2012 - 04:32 AM

It's really hard for me (that's what she said...) because I love them both in different ways. I chose Aliens just because to me it's got an awesome "popcorn movie" excitement going for it, just a super FUN movie. Alien, though is more "perfect" a film. And of course yeah, the design is amazing on Alien. "A perfect organism," Ash would call it.

#138 BloodBoal

BloodBoal

    A Very Respectable Messenger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9325 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 June 2012 - 01:22 PM

Just finished watching Alien3. After the thriller film, after the action film, this one is the pseudo socio-religious film.

It was worse than I remembered. And I watched the Special Edition, which is supposed to be better!

Really an awful film. It feels cheap. Really, really cheap. Almost feels like a TV film, actually. Most of the FX are awful (although there is one shot where the xenomoph never looked better: the one where it's close to Ripley's face. Amazing animatronic here.).
Same for the characters: I didn't care about any of them, there are all so cliché it's not even funny. Most are nameless cardboards that are just here to die. And the others who actually have names and are developped are just plain boring.
Every attack of the xenomorph feels lame. There is no tension, no thrills, nothing. You can feel here that the series had run its course at this point.
I was also tired of all those low angles shots. Seriously, there are so many, it made me sick.
And one last thing I didn't like: the whole facehugger business, which isn't pretty clear, and that has lead to the whole bullshit "Two facehuggers"/"One superfacehugger" theories.
Spoiler


There are few good things, though. Always liked the opening sequence (even though it creates one major plot hole that is never solved), with Goldenthal's music which really enhances the scene. I know a lot of people don't like the fact that they killed all the characters who survived in the previous film, but that wasn't a problem for me. In fact, it lead to a scene which was pretty good
Spoiler

Charles Dance is also quite good in this (but is there any film in which he is not good, anyway?). The only interesting character in the bunch.
Spoiler

The fact that Ripley is pregnant with a xenomorph was also an interesting idea (and frankly, the last you could really develop with the franchise concept), but I'm not sure it was handled properly.
About the xenomorph scene, I've read it differs in the Theatrical Version and the Special Edition. Don't remember the dog scene, but the ox scene was a bit stupid. Can you imagine a facehugger on an ox? Looks pretty stupid, huh? The only thing that saved this scene was the editing, with the black dude speech being shown at the same time. It made the scene work, in a certain way. The alien coming out of a dog makes more sense for the rest of the film, though. It explains why the xenomorph is faster. With the ox, that simply doesn't cut it.

Anyway, all in all, clearly the worst film of the trilogy. Goldenthal's score has probably the most interesting cues from the franchise, though.

I'd be interested in knowing Cremers' thoughts on this one.

P.S.: On a unrelated note, why is the film titled Alien3? There are not mathematics involved in the film, and there are no aliens mating in this one to justify an Alien2, let alone an Alien3.

'Forget the notes!' - Hans Zimmer, June 2013

 

hobbitskn.jpg


#139 Chaac

Chaac

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8594 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 23 June 2012 - 01:37 PM

I read how that film started and I thought it wasn't worth seeing it.

#140 BloodBoal

BloodBoal

    A Very Respectable Messenger

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 9325 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 23 June 2012 - 01:52 PM

You're a wiser man than I ever will be.

'Forget the notes!' - Hans Zimmer, June 2013

 

hobbitskn.jpg


#141 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 23 June 2012 - 03:50 PM

i agree, Alien3

Just finished watching Alien3. After the thriller film, after the action film, this one is the pseudo socio-religious film.

It was worse than I remembered. And I watched the Special Edition, which is supposed to be better!

Really an awful film. It feels cheap. Really, really cheap. Almost feels like a TV film, actually. Most of the FX are awful (although there is one shot where the xenomoph never looked better: the one where it's close to Ripley's face. Amazing animatronic here.).
Same for the characters: I didn't care about any of them, there are all so cliché it's not even funny. Most are nameless cardboards that are just here to die. And the others who actually have names and are developped are just plain boring.
Every attack of the xenomorph feels lame. There is no tension, no thrills, nothing. You can feel here that the series had run its course at this point.
I was also tired of all those low angles shots. Seriously, there are so many, it made me sick.


Well, I agree with everything you wrote here. Although, I'm not sure whether the characters are that cliché. I certainly don't like how they are presented, that's for sure. There is something overly serious, swollen, almost bombastic about them.
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#142 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21550 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 23 June 2012 - 04:01 PM

I haven't seen it in years. Not a good movie, but I do remember thinking the sequence where they are working together to lure and trap the alien was pretty tense and genuinely well done. But the cgi was shit even back then.

#143 KK.

KK.

    Rich in Fish!

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 4596 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 23 June 2012 - 04:01 PM

I read how that film started and I thought it wasn't worth seeing it.


Likewise. I didn't bother with this film.

#144 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 23 June 2012 - 04:04 PM

The early CGI is shockingly terrible. Couldn't believe it was that bad. Much worse than I remembered it. It's the film's deathblow.
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#145 Miles Prower

Miles Prower

    Deserved the Best Picture win

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1222 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Genesis Planet

Posted 23 June 2012 - 05:59 PM

I love Alien3 - though maybe it's because I'm the only one on the planet (aside from Fincher, maybe) who doesn't care about how the first five minutes craps on Aliens' ending.
Posted Image

#146 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 23 June 2012 - 06:23 PM

Even Fincher doesn't care about Alien3.
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#147 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21550 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 23 June 2012 - 06:26 PM

Nobody cares about it.

*weeps a single tear, runs down cheek*

#148 Miles Prower

Miles Prower

    Deserved the Best Picture win

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1222 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Genesis Planet

Posted 23 June 2012 - 06:42 PM

Even Fincher doesn't care about Alien3.


Never said he did. :P
Posted Image

#149 Koray Savas

Koray Savas

    Grandest Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 24 June 2012 - 01:48 AM

Yeah he disowns it. They offered him to make his own cut for the new anthology but he refused.

In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.


#150 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 24 June 2012 - 06:03 AM

Nobody cares about it.


I amazes me to this very day that Fincher was able to recover from Alien3. That there was actually some money dude who said to him, "Don't worry, Finch, here's the money. Now go and make your next movie! "

With Se7en, Fincher bounced back with a triumph.


Alex
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#151 Chaac

Chaac

    Veteran

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 8594 posts
  • Gender:Female

Posted 24 June 2012 - 09:04 AM

I loved Se7en on first viewing. But seeing it later I lost interest on it.

#152 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21550 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 24 June 2012 - 09:07 AM

Massively overrated movie. Good though.

#153 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 24 June 2012 - 06:01 PM

Hmm, I understand why it's rated so highly. Even when the horror or thriller effect has worn out on you, which tends to happen with this genre (we get used to it), it is still a great mood piece.
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#154 crocodile

crocodile

    A part-time Horner apologist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10305 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:River of Nile

Posted 24 June 2012 - 06:02 PM

?

Karol
From a storytelling point of view, from a directing point of view, there is one thing I associate with what he does, which is calm. There is such an inherent calm and inherent trust of the one powerful image, that he makes me embarrassed with my own work, in terms of how many different shots, how many different sound effects, how many different things we’ll throw at an audience to make an impression. But with Kubrick, there is such a great trust of the one correct image to calmly explain something to audience. There can be some slowness to the editing. There’s nothing frenetic about it. It’s very simple. There’s a trust in simple storytelling and simple image making that actually takes massive confidence to try and emulate. - Christopher Nolan

#155 Alexcremers

Alexcremers

    Grand Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16597 posts

Posted 24 June 2012 - 06:05 PM

Oops
Pictures, visual images, are far better to achieve that end than any words, particularly now, when the world has lost all mystery and magic and speech has become mere chatter, empty of meaning - Andrei Tarkovsky

#156 crocodile

crocodile

    A part-time Horner apologist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 10305 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:River of Nile

Posted 24 June 2012 - 06:10 PM

I read the updated post again.

Karol
From a storytelling point of view, from a directing point of view, there is one thing I associate with what he does, which is calm. There is such an inherent calm and inherent trust of the one powerful image, that he makes me embarrassed with my own work, in terms of how many different shots, how many different sound effects, how many different things we’ll throw at an audience to make an impression. But with Kubrick, there is such a great trust of the one correct image to calmly explain something to audience. There can be some slowness to the editing. There’s nothing frenetic about it. It’s very simple. There’s a trust in simple storytelling and simple image making that actually takes massive confidence to try and emulate. - Christopher Nolan

#157 Koray Savas

Koray Savas

    Grandest Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 24 June 2012 - 06:12 PM

I love Seven.

In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.


#158 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21550 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:07 PM

Hmm, I understand why it's rated so highly. Even when the horror or thriller effect has worn out on you, which tends to happen with this genre (we get used to it), it is still a great mood piece.


The ending feels like a different movie, though. Feels like Tony Scott suddenly got behind the camera.

#159 Koray Savas

Koray Savas

    Grandest Master

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28052 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:10 PM

How so?

In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.


#160 Quint

Quint

    Let's cook

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21550 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:The Black Lodge

Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:14 PM

The swirling helicopter shots, the sweaty desert heat, the style of the score. Scott trademarks.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users