JW jokes in HS Orchestra?
#1
Posted 05 January 2004 - 09:53 PM
Today, during orchestra, we were going to compose a piece as an orchestra to play in the concert, our conductor went through the list of things we cannot do while writing and one of the things he said was "We cannot copy things from other songs or tunes, we are not John Williams" I actually think he said that to me knowing i would be the only one who would get it.....
Just a strange little JW reference at school, meanwhile, the band was playing the "Harry Potter Symphonic Suite" which is surely one of the most examples of what my orchestra teacher said....
#2
Posted 05 January 2004 - 09:58 PM
#3
Posted 05 January 2004 - 09:59 PM
#4
Posted 05 January 2004 - 10:02 PM
#5
Posted 05 January 2004 - 10:05 PM
#6
Posted 05 January 2004 - 10:58 PM
- Sean - Who thinks Williams would have even more respect if he started writing more music for the concert hall
#7
Posted 05 January 2004 - 11:26 PM
Ray Barnsbury
#8
Posted 05 January 2004 - 11:28 PM
#9
Posted 05 January 2004 - 11:29 PM
#10
Posted 05 January 2004 - 11:50 PM
Also point out (if it's true) that you became interested in music because of Williams' work and you don't appreciate him bad mouthing it.
Neil - tired of those who can't back up there claims!
#11
Posted 05 January 2004 - 11:54 PM
#12
Posted 06 January 2004 - 12:37 AM
#13
Posted 06 January 2004 - 01:02 AM
#14
Posted 06 January 2004 - 01:26 AM
#15
Posted 06 January 2004 - 01:40 AM
#16
Posted 06 January 2004 - 01:41 AM
Music copyright only covers obvious melody anyway. Harmony etc are "public domain"
#17
Posted 06 January 2004 - 02:13 AM
I think it's small-mindedness on a person's behalf when they say eg. "Williams ripped off Straus' Death and Transfiguration for his Superman Love Theme". Yes, there are melodic similarities. The first five notes (tonic, maj 3rd, 5th, 10th, and 9th) occur in the same order. But Williams goes off in a totally different direction afterwards. Other than the 9th, this is a basic arpeggiation. Like I said, just because they are an educator, doesn't mean they know what they're talking about all of the time.
Horner on the other hand lifts complete sections of music from Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet as well as The Philosopher's mvmnt. from his Cantata on the 40th Anniversary of the 1917 Revolution. All of the instrumentation and dynamics, heck even the text for Christ's sake, are the same. But the closest Williams ever came to outright plagiarism was The Little People music from Star Wars where he copied a section of Stravinsky's RITE OF SPRING from the woodwinds to the bassoon solo. It's pretty obvious actually but I can't really pick on him for that.
In most cases, Williams evokes music from the past. I love his "Hooknapped" music even though Korngold wrote a similar ascending/descending low string figure on one of his cues for SEA HAWK decades earlier. But using a string figure from a master like Korngold in a film that also has pirates to me is a homage rather than a lift. There is a little context there. Horner will rip off Prokofiev for a movie that has nothing to do with Russians (like STAR TREK 3).
I could actually write an article about this so I think I'll just stop right here.
#18
Posted 06 January 2004 - 02:23 AM
The piece fit in perfectly, and being that it's depicting Romans at war, music evoking the Roman god of war is fitting.
#19
Posted 06 January 2004 - 03:00 AM
But seriously, I don't really have much against Zimmer's GLADIATOR. It served the film reasonably well. I don't think it was fair for people to compare that to NOrth's Spartacus. Different time of filmmaking. And North is a god in the film scoring community. I wouldn't even compare Williams to him and Johnny's my favorite composer of all time!
#20
Posted 06 January 2004 - 09:24 AM
Another remark I've heard about scores like SW or TESB, is that Williams "plays the same over and over again". Again, they forget that these works are thematic, and that these themes represent something. Not to mention that tempo and orchestration often vary.
- Marc, who gets annoyed by such ignorance.
#21
Posted 06 January 2004 - 11:32 AM
I'm more worried when a Linkin park or Brittany Spears fan LIKES a John Williams piece.
#22
Posted 06 January 2004 - 09:53 PM
#23
Posted 07 January 2004 - 02:57 AM
Sean - Who can go from John Williams to Metallica and back very quickly (as odd as that may be...)
#24
Posted 07 January 2004 - 03:48 AM
#25
Posted 07 January 2004 - 04:47 AM
I was just trying to illustrate that it's not worth getting flustered when someone makes a disparaging remark about Williams or his music. They know not what they speak.
#26
Posted 07 January 2004 - 08:44 AM
I am a huge music fan...I'll listen to it all. Here I am on this message board, a John Williams fan, when I HAVE the Linkin Park cd. I believe I listen to classical music because as a musican, I apreciate the talent that these people have that rock stars dont always have. There is a time to listen to Linkin Park, Metallica, ACDC, etc...and there is a time to listen to John Williams. I think it is important to have a mixed varity in music taste.
Sean - Who can go from John Williams to Metallica and back very quickly (as odd as that may be...)
But you didn't say why it worried you "when a Linkin park or Brittany Spears fan LIKES a John Williams piece".
#27
Posted 07 January 2004 - 10:56 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











