Luke you're clueless in your response.
I'm talking about my thread title being changed
Mr. Clueless, just look at the thread title of Pieter Boelen's Raiders of the Lost ark rating poll.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 06:24 PM
Luke you're clueless in your response.
I'm talking about my thread title being changed

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
Posted 20 February 2009 - 07:46 PM
no its news, if the film is dead, thats news. And if Spielbergs clout is reduced that too is news.What you wrote isn't news but sheer lurid tabloidism.
It's not about being among my favorites or the people's favorites. A new score by John Williams will be always better than nothing.
One of these days some studio is going to look at Steven and say, "you know Steve you're making hits but we're not seeing the same returns. The studio feels we need to step in and make some changes to your film. Dump Williams and get some more contemporary hip composer and then here are some other changes...." etc etc etc
Posted 20 February 2009 - 07:56 PM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 07:59 PM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:17 PM
Tom, if Spielberg's clout is diminished, how is that not news, and if Lincoln isn't being made isn't that also news.
I'd rather SS make Interstellar. I'd rather he stick to more lighter movies and let other directors make serious stuff. As I've said repeatedly the Lincoln story just isn't that interesting to me. If he ends up making it, I will see it once, and find it to be like his other serious films, seriously flawed.

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:24 PM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:33 PM
You do know studios have stepped in and taken the films out of directors hands before, making changes at their will.
Tom, if Spielberg's clout is diminished, how is that not news, and if Lincoln isn't being made isn't that also news.
I'd rather SS make Interstellar. I'd rather he stick to more lighter movies and let other directors make serious stuff. As I've said repeatedly the Lincoln story just isn't that interesting to me. If he ends up making it, I will see it once, and find it to be like his other serious films, seriously flawed.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:40 PM
Tom, if Spielberg's clout is diminished, how is that not news, and if Lincoln isn't being made isn't that also news.
I'd rather SS make Interstellar. I'd rather he stick to more lighter movies and let other directors make serious stuff. As I've said repeatedly the Lincoln story just isn't that interesting to me. If he ends up making it, I will see it once, and find it to be like his other serious films, seriously flawed.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 08:56 PM
This is Spielberg we're talking about. Even in the sci-fi scenario of the industry not respecting him anymore where couldn't even get distribution for films he would (cause he could) finance himself, there are many things to change about his filmmaking style before touching the scores. I mean, of all the worries.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:04 PM
Spielberg's maturation as a filmaker is both good and bad. In one sense it's allowed him to tackle subject matters he never would have done early in his career but it's also taken some of the fun out of him as well.
When I hear him say he could never make CE3K today because he allowed Neary to leave his family or when he removes guns and replaces them with radios I thank the film gods that he made those films when he did.
If he were to do Jaws today the Alex Kitner sequence may have never been filmed.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:04 PM
Tom, if Spielberg's clout is diminished, how is that not news, and if Lincoln isn't being made isn't that also news.
I'd rather SS make Interstellar. I'd rather he stick to more lighter movies and let other directors make serious stuff. As I've said repeatedly the Lincoln story just isn't that interesting to me. If he ends up making it, I will see it once, and find it to be like his other serious films, seriously flawed.
How the hell is 'losing his clout' news? That's your opinion of Spielberg's output.
Although I do happen to agree with it. Spielberg is one of the few artists whose earlier work I enjoy far, far more. The more I watch Indy 4, the worse it gets.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:08 PM
I get your point, but I still maintain that nobody forces changes into a Spielberg film (unless Lucas is producing), and that's not going to change anytime soon.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:17 PM
Woo hoo! 3 Munich fans on the board:Munich is an emotional powerhouse of a score.
Jeshopk
Koray
Merkel
Make that four!
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:20 PM
oh your right, the once most successful and powerful director in the world not being the most powerful anymore isn't news, no....
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:26 PM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:28 PM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:37 PM
of those only War of the Worlds was a blockbuster, the other films were bombs at the US boxoffice.
Since SPR he's only had 3 films that were very successful and one marginally successful, the rest did poorly.
I'd rather SS make Interstellar. I'd rather he stick to more lighter movies and let other directors make serious stuff. As I've said repeatedly the Lincoln story just isn't that interesting to me. If he ends up making it, I will see it once, and find it to be like his other serious films, seriously flawed.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:38 PM
you're being obtuse arn't you? If the man can't get it done then its news, not opinion. The mere fact that he had to go begging is a sign of his diminish clout. If anyone else had said it you'd be in complete agreement but because I said it....Indeed.
Opinion vs fact again Joey. Or do we need to repeat that class?
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:39 PM
box office isn't everything
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:43 PM
If the man can't get it done then its news, not opinion.
The mere fact that he had to go begging is a sign of his diminish clout.
If anyone else had said it you'd be in complete agreement but because I said it....
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:48 PM
It would be better than Michael Bay, that's for sure.Frankly I'd rather see Spileberg take the reigns and direct a summer "B" film like Transformers.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:48 PM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:57 PM
put the pipe down Tom, if the man goes begging, which he did, its a sign his clout is dimished.
15 years ago who'd beleive that Spielberg could not get 50 million dollars to make a movie.
He should take a lesson from Durabont, and make Lincoln down and dirty like Frank did the Mist.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 09:59 PM
Get over yourself
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 10:19 PM
put the pipe down Tom, if the man goes begging, which he did, its a sign his clout is dimished.
15 years ago who'd beleive that Spielberg could not get 50 million dollars to make a movie.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 10:22 PM
Posted 20 February 2009 - 10:45 PM
Joe says the sky is blue, Luke says technically its azure, Tom says well its gray here, Datameister says its spelled bleu.

I hope Episode III is Called 'Revenge of the Sith'
Posted 20 February 2009 - 10:52 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 11:49 PM
No I think Mark and I have been right and that Spielberg doesn't get the automatic pass he once did, and the fact that Dreamworks has basically failed doesn't say much good.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 11:51 PM
@Wojo: stop being facetious.
Posted 20 February 2009 - 11:53 PM
I wonder when that will actually happen, like when Hitchcock was being told he was old news and subsequently got rid of Herrmann. The only reason it hasn't happened to Lucas is that Lucas financed his own movies; he set himself up to be such a godfigure that no one could tell him "Dude, you ain't got it no more."One of these days some studio is going to look at Steven and say, "you know Steve you're making hits but we're not seeing the same returns. The studio feels we need to step in and make some changes to your film. Dump Williams and get some more contemporary hip composer and then here are some other changes...." etc etc etc
That is why I say what I say.
Frankly I'd rather see Spileberg take the reigns and direct a summer "B" film like Transformers.
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:12 AM
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:30 AM
Fifteen years ago we weren't entering a severe financial crisis.put the pipe down Tom, if the man goes begging, which he did, its a sign his clout is dimished.
15 years ago who'd beleive that Spielberg could not get 50 million dollars to make a movie.
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:32 AM
doesn't seem to have affected the boxoffice Henry,Fifteen years ago we weren't entering a severe financial crisis.put the pipe down Tom, if the man goes begging, which he did, its a sign his clout is dimished.
15 years ago who'd beleive that Spielberg could not get 50 million dollars to make a movie.
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:34 AM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:40 AM
no Koray it hasn't been.Um, this whole thread is mainly about how box office doesn't matter.
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:47 AM
In 50 years Herrmann will be forgotten.
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:51 AM
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:56 AM
Posted 21 February 2009 - 03:22 AM
Joe said it. I mean really, what more do you need?I'd like to see some figures proving that the economic crisis is having no effect on Hollywood and that Spielberg can't get Lincoln made purely because of his "diminishing clout."
Discussion →
John Williams →
John Williams Plagiarizing HimselfStarted by ComposerEthan, 16 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
John Williams →
Missouri Breaks new expanded edition coming from KritzerlandStarted by Jason LeBlanc, 08 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
John Williams →
What post-2005 films do you wish Williams had scored?Started by Jason LeBlanc, 01 May 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
General Discussion →
Star Trek Into Darkness SPOILERS ALLOWED Discussion ThreadStarted by Jason LeBlanc, 23 Apr 2013 |
|
|
||
Discussion →
General Discussion →
2012 IFMCA Awards: NominationsStarted by Erik Woods, 07 Feb 2013 |
|
|
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users