Moving away from the typical, dull, boring garbage the usual suspects engage in. Jim Emerson has done a really neat analysis of The Dark Knight's action set piece. You can watch it here, it touches on some of what I talked about, and misses out on plenty more errors and opportunities to criticize but for those who don't generally go into movies thinking about scenes like this it might really get you into that mindset. http://vimeo.com/28792404 After you watch that, be sure to watch his analysis of Salt's set piece, so you can see how an at least functionally well done action sequence compares. I think it's really important that you see the comparison to really appreciate the difference. http://vimeo.com/28957441 In the Salt one he briefly touches on one of my biggest complaints with Nolan, which is logically *layering* and composing shots to help convey meaning and location. This is why I say Nolan is a 2D linear thinker. Finally, if you're still interested and want to continue learning how to look at the scenes analytically here's another one, again use it to compare with Nolan's truck chase. http://vimeo.com/29129274 And if at the end of all that you're still interested check out Emerson's companion writing for the videos, which provide some interesting nuggets of analysis: http://blogs.indiewi...ristopher_Nolan http://blogs.indiewi..._Phillip_Noyce_ http://blogs.suntime...bullitt_th.html Again, there's so much more he could go into, but I think he does a good job of explaining some of the important stuff. To quote a YouTube commenter on The Dark Knight analysis: