I'm resorting this up because I think all this useless and stupid controversy needs clarifications. I already wrote this on the FSM board, but I guess repetita juvant: First of all, let's get down to facts: the day after this stupid controversy exploded (keep in mind it was created and agitated by incorrect Italian news agency reports and then reprised by international agencies), Morricone released an official press statement to correct and clarify what he said. Here's a translation: I think this clarifies everything. The fact he isn't comfortable with a movie showing so much blood and carnage maybe sounds ridiculous to some fellows here considering he scored A LOT of violent and disturbing films over his long career. But we should take into account that he's now 85 years-old and probably his taste in movies has changed. Also, everyone who knows and follows Morricone since a long time knows very well that the core matter about consistency and coherence of film composition has ALWAYS been one of his strongest aesthetic flags, which he sometimes defended to the point of sounding a bit rude. He always believed in film music as something that needs artistic integrity and he spoke against the usage of "preexisting tracks-as-film-score" many times, especially when this approach is in conflict with an original score. He had strong discussions with Terrence Malick during DAYS OF HEAVEN and he had the guts to tell him: "Terry, you HAVE TO choose!" (this is a story he told during a public conference I attended). But he always acknowledged the FREEDOM of the director to choose whatever approach is right for the movie (in fact, he spoke highly several times about Kubrick's use of music in his movies and it looks like he's fine with Tarantino's as well). But he pertains to a generation/category of film composers (like Williams and Goldsmith) who STRONGLY believe in the creation of original music suited and tailored to the film's needs, with the utmost respect of the film itself. As he many times stated, the primary task of the film composer is TO SERVE the film. In this sense, I find perfectly understandable he maybe doesn't see eye-to-eye with some of Tarantino's musical choices. Nevertheless, he respects and admires him. What I found quite insulting in all this useless controversy is the fact that most of the people who commented it around the internet quickly divided into fanboy factions (be it Tarantino's camp or Morricone's camp), following this nowadays common internet behavior of taking a stance over every single matter to the point of catfighting over it. And this happened also with film music lovers, who should probably be more aware than others that what Morricone said is something that's part of the job of the film composer (i.e. discussing and even dissenting with the director, finding the right approach for the movie, etc.). Instead, many score nerds popped up and started to lambast Morricone, depicting him as an old fart who is out of touch with contemporary film aesthetics. Yesterday I did a piece about this for the website I write for. It's written in Italian, but maybe with an automated translator you'll get what is my feeling over all this: http://bit.ly/114TAii