Jump to content

Dixon Hill

Members
  • Posts

    20,598
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    89

Posts posted by Dixon Hill

  1. Lower dynamics/more relaxed playing leading to a warm and broad sound.  Lexicon on everything.  Todd-AO in its heyday.  Natural dynamic range.

     

    The 80s were tinny.  Everything before that is crap quality whether you like it or not.  You might be nostalgic about the sound of Star Wars 77 but it is shit sound.  Shore's trilogy from 2001-2003 was the last great example of pinnacle 90s sonic quality.  Since then dynamic range has suffered, playing techniques have changed and made things harsher.  Overall aesthetics are different because of the widespread hybrid approach, and it sounds great with that stuff, but even straight orchestral music is being treated differently.  What's the last symphonic score that really sounded good on every front?  Silvestri's Avengers, the first one?  The end credits on that rock.  Nothing else really stands out.  I welcome recommendations. 

  2. Well I can't say I know what anyone involved truly intended, but I do see Williams' music as reaching beyond the bleak surface to the real heart of matters, rather than it being a synthetic facade.  The music and film both have such masterful handling of light and shade that I can't look at either as plainly happy or disturbing.  It seems to be about happy things in a disturbing context, but given the family men behind the film I err on the side of the emotional thrust being more important than the seeming scifi twistedness of things. 

  3. 5 hours ago, crumbs said:

     

    The ending is deeply disturbing to me, though I accept that endings like this will yield different reactions depending on the viewer.

     

    David was designed to unconditionally love a mother. He was created to fulfill Monica's needs as a mother while her biological son could not. At the end, once all that remains are the descendants of humanity's artificial creations, a fake Monica is created to fulfill David's need to be someone's child.

     

    An idealised version of the real Monica is created to unconditionally love David. We see David make her coffee, watch them play hide and seek, see David tuck Monica into bed. All these events are repeated from Act I except the roles are reversed. Now it is David whose needs are being fulfilled, the artificial being now playing the role of a human once all humanity is gone.

     

    This is Spielberg & Kubrick's bleakest, most challenging ending because it shows how self-delusion can result in wish fulfillment. The cloned Monica is nothing like the one from David's past but he cares not. He believes the fantasy; he's reunited with his "mother", he believes his wish has come true. Yet the fairy-tale ending is as artificial as David himself.

     

    Like any film it's a Rorschach test for the viewer and we take away what is most applicable to us.  Everything you say is true, but I don't see any of it as the main point of the film or what Spielberg/Kubrick wanted to ultimately convey.  That's the difference between it being a rather hollow commentary on something purely speculative, and a deeply moving statement on real things.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.