Jump to content

batmatt92

Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About batmatt92

  • Birthday 30/01/1992

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.youtube.com/batmatt92

Profile

  • Location
    Los Angeles

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Uninspired choice of composer aside, I'm actually hugely optimistic for the movie itself! Even if it won't dethrone Superman '78, I think it at least has a good chance of being the best since. Superman is my favorite fictional character (don't let my username/avatar fool you ) and Gunn has been saying all the right things for me in regard to story, tone, character. The comics he's cited as his key sources of inspiration are among my all-time favorites. I think all the casting choices so far have been spot on. Not to mention Guardians 3 was my favorite Marvel movie in quiiiiite a while. I'm hyped.
  2. Already some work happening on the score, despite filming being several months away! And we still don't know who the composer is. But Gunn has been working with John Murphy quite a lot recently, so I'm expecting it to be him...
  3. No idea, but that's exactly 99 months from today. So if Mattris is sure that Episode X's release is "double digit months away", it will have to be by then at the latest!
  4. This is all I wanted to know, personally. I'm really looking forward to J.J. Abrams' Star Wars Episode X, to be released sometime before April 6th 2031!
  5. Is this likely to get a digital release at some point in the future? I know a lot of Varese stuff does these days, but not always, right?
  6. To complicate matters slightly, I've noticed that the shortened version of "The Final Battle" includes a bolder, more triumphant-sounding statement of the Williams Superman theme (an insert?) at 2:43, compared to the more subdued version in the full length track at the same moment (timestamp 9:23). In the film it sounds like the shorter track. I'm not sure if there are any other differences between the two huge long tracks and their shorter counterparts, but this is the only one that really stood out to me on casual listens.
  7. I think at least as long as James Gunn is in charge, we won't have to worry about that: https://twitter.com/JamesGunn/status/1320146417835339776?s=20 But of course, there's probably nothing stopping some other filmmaker from coming along later and deciding to resurrect a character that Gunn killed off. But that's a ways down the road, if it ever happens.
  8. It has four returning cast members from the previous one, so I think it's safe to call it a sequel.
  9. ^ Ha! That sneaky bastard! I checked the two tracks in question again, and it seems that the differences in length don't really help determine which is which. They both fade out at about 7:53, they just have different amounts of silence after that. And I'm having a hard time noticing the differences in actual musical content. So I guess I'll just trust the track listing until a more diligent listener uncovers the truth! If any more diligent listeners actually care, that is
  10. Super late to the party, but I just bought this and it's beauuuutiful. Would anybody happen to know which cues are different in the director's cut of the film? The liner notes on this release say that some of the alternates on disc 3 were used for that version, but they don't specify which ones.
  11. What about Goldsmith's The Mummy? Or is it already in order?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.