toothless

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

“His music is all melody-driven” is such a pretentious take. As if being melodic were a flaw, or as if music automatically becomes deeper the more atonal or inaccessible it is. It is the usual elitist reflex: dismiss what moves people, then pretend the dismissal itself is sophistication.

At Beauxbatons they call it Platform Royale with Cheese.

Andrew Lockington! He knows how to do fun adventurous music.

Andrew Lockington! He knows how to do fun adventurous music.

Andrew Lockington! He knows how to do fun adventurous music.

Andrew Lockington! He knows how to do fun adventurous music.

Andrew Lockington! He knows how to do fun adventurous music.

Andrew Lockington! He knows how to do fun adventurous music.

I don't know if this blighter is replacing Viggo - I should hope not, especially given how much younger he is - but if he is (horribile dictu) the movie is pretty much unmarketable.
 
The whole novelty of the movie is to see Viggo reprise Aragorn.

The more times I hear "The Sun Yet Shines", the more I am convinced is one of my favorite pieces of film music ever, and certainly at the very top of the best film music pieces of the 2020s.
 
Anyone else love this cue and not getting remotely sick of hearing it a lot yet?
 
Every time it comes up on a shuffle I get so pumped!

The Pitt season 2 is shaping up to be as great as season 1. love it!

well I wouldn’t be so sure given this quote:
 
 

@Maurizio posted this in another thread, but I thought I'd share it here:
 
While it may sound unprecedented, I think it is great; it allows the Maestro to really give this film to attention he always gives.
 
I still find it hilarious that the sessions for Mark Mancina's score to the Moana remake were postponed in favor of the Maestro's score for Disclosure Day. Any excuse to postpone (or outright cancel, but that's wishful thinking) these Disney live-action remakes is a plus. To be postponed as a result of Steven Spielberg and John Williams; that is just *chef's kiss*.

At least we’re avoiding “Oh Deer!” Which would have been the track name under Gia. 

At least we’re avoiding “Oh Deer!” Which would have been the track name under Gia. 

At least we’re avoiding “Oh Deer!” Which would have been the track name under Gia. 

At least we’re avoiding “Oh Deer!” Which would have been the track name under Gia. 

At least we’re avoiding “Oh Deer!” Which would have been the track name under Gia.