Jump to content

Charlie Brigden

Members
  • Posts

    7,299
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Charlie Brigden

  1. I agree, this is kind of why I came back here. But I just don't have the freaking time. I have a half-written review of Gremlins that's been sitting open for days, plus other stuff I need to listen to. The other reason is, I just can't afford them like I used to. Gremlins was one I had to make time for, but I've seen so many releases like 1941 go past because I didn't have the cash. Not a complaint as times are hard for everyone, but a reason nonetheless.

    Thankfully I'm getting Wolfen for christmas!

  2. And a lot of it is usually down to how good the director and editorial guys are at telling the story, visually and audibly. I can think of a ton of moments where it could be described that we're "told how to feel", but the most successful of those are when the characters and story have been given enough audience investment that it becomes augmentation rather than direction.

  3. I asked what the forum thought of Morricone, it replied:

    font style="font-size:85%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"brdiv style="padding-top:0.8em;"img alt="" height="1" width="1"/divdiv class=lhtable border=0 align=right cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0cellpadding=3 style="font-size:100%;font-family:arial,sans-serif"trtd width=80 align=center style="padding-left:6px;" valign=topa href="http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=Tct=us/1-0i-
  4. Just gave it a few minutes of listen and I am afraid you are right, I am 95% sure the Oscar will go to the operetta pastiche The Artist. It is an infectious score I must say, though. The irony is that JW could have easily written a similar score, and probably better.

    Heh, that sounds lovely. I am even more looking forward to this film (I thankfully have preview tickets). Hopefully I can see WAR HORSE at the same time.

  5. While I think he has a point with scoring as a whole, I don't get why he's going at Williams. Surely there are worse things in Hollywood scoring than his approach. Is this just because he works with Spielberg? The man has a petty dislike for SS to the point where he keeps going public and it makes him look like a jerk.

  6. WOLFEN - 1981, by Michael Wadleigh

    The new Intrada release of Horner's score inspired me to pop this one in again. It's still one of the most interesting films of the early 80's. Partly paranoid 70's thriller with an environment twist, part glossy high-tech thriller realized with expensive SFX (and Spielberg's beloved Louma crane), it features Albert Finney as crusty cop on a murder investigation, who finds disturbing hints of what is behind some grisly murders in NYC.

    As it turns out, packs of wolves rail against the Big Apple, which stands for all the dysfunctional molochs in western civilsation. While this may sound somewhat gimmicky, the film takes its time to reveal the whole scope of its mystery and grounds it in indian mythology. There are some truly frightening scenes when the wolves finally come out of the dark - wait for an attack on Wall St. which is as scary as it is impressively realized. The finale sees Finney making amends to his attackers, showing an understanding of what they are reacting to - the scene easily could have gone wrong, but it's here where everything comes together, from great acting to Horner's mystique-laden score (drawing from Ives' Unanswered Question). I forgive it some obvious-nesses and action movie clichés, for its riches are far outweighing any serious criticisms. Recommended.

    :up:

    I love this movie. It's such a unique approach, and as you say the finale works well, especially with that haunting epilogue cue from Horner.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.