Jump to content

Charlie Brigden

Members
  • Posts

    7,299
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Charlie Brigden

  1. "Blade Runner" is good as is, but with a better, more compelling story, this film could have been dynamite. Structurally, this movie really, really wanders. With a better voice-over, more effective music in places (although "Memories" is beautiful), and a better plot, the movie would be much better IMO. But more importantly, it would not have alienated that huge portion of the audience that completely loses interest without a more compelling story (not concept- the concept is great).

    I disagree, I find the story incredibly compelling and incredibly interesting. I think most of the people that got alienated were the people who thought they'd be seeing another Han Solo or Indiana Jones adventure and instead got some cerebral SF. That and the awful, awful 'Tell-the-audience-what-the-characters-are-thinking' voiceover. Thankfully, the director's cut/final cut has changed that somewhat and the film is rightly held up as a masterpiece.

  2. I was overwhelmed, I think. Sensory overload (that's my pretentious way of saying "geekgasm"). My wife and I were just repeatedly saying "oh my god oh my god oh my god oh my god" for about ten minutes after.

    we came out stunned too, but we were underwhelmed. While both of us really like it, it failed to live up to the hype.

    *** out of ****

    the more I think about it the more I think Eckhart was the star, sad but Bale was overshadowed by Eckhart, Ledger, Caine, Freeman, and Oldman.

    I see where you're coming from, but I don't see him as overshadowed. I think (like HEAT, which it clearly owes a debt to) it's a fine ensemble piece, and I never saw anyone as anything other than the character. There was no Bale, Ledger, Eckhart, etc. There was just Batman, Joker, Harvey. I agree that Eckhart was incredible, a real dark horse, and I love what they did with him.

  3. THE DARK KNIGHT

    Stunning.

    Joseph.

    Please not that in my review I made no comparison between the 1989 version and the recent Nolan versions.

    I have not seen either, though i probably will in the next weeks.

    you're not talking to me, I know noone named Joseph.

    Nicholson became a parody of himself in the Shining, so I do understand what you mean, he rarely plays anyone but "Jack".

    Jack, DeNiro and Pacino are all incapable of becoming another character in a film, which is fine, they are stars and icons.

    I think that's doing a disservice to his performance. I see where you're coming from, but I think he became a parody of himself after THE SHINING. That role is still his absolute peak. I don't really like his Joker, but then again, Keaton and the Batmobile aside I don't really like that movie. The opening titles are great but it goes downhill after that. He's fine for what it is, I just don't like what it is.

  4. STAR TREK: THE MOTION PICTURE

    I like the idea, as it seems like actual proper SF instead of endless starship battles, but it's a turgid piece of entertainment. Also, the wormhole sequence is hilarious. The effects are mostly good, and the score is obviously genius, but it bored me out of my skull. Thank god for TWOK.

  5. Of course it's a nice place if everyone agrees. But life isn't interesting without a healthy balance of conflict and agreement.

    Seconded. This place is downright placid compared to some boards I used to visit. Some people probably could be a little more respectful, but we have Joey to mock all that anyway. But I don't ever want to be a part of something that's just love, love, love. I love the TDK score, and I'm perfectly happy that most people don't. Doesn't bother me one bit but I'll enjoy arguing my point.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.