Jump to content

pixie_twinkle

Members
  • Posts

    4,896
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by pixie_twinkle

  1. It's a bit different from Batman and other reboot series though in that all the Bond films are still considered part of the official Bond "series". Until Skyfall was named it was known as Bond 23. I doubt they'll go back and remake earlier storylines because the series would be repeating itself (some would argue that the Bond films are similar enough already without remaking old storylines!).

  2. I wouldn't even say Moonraker is a "bad" movie. There are just too many great scenes. The opening skydiving scene is amazing. The entire carnival scene is exciting and tense, especially Jaws appearing in the alleyway. I always loved the boat/waterfall scene (even if the version of the 007 theme is too slow!), and Michel Lonsdale makes a very effective villain. Love the cable car scenes. Damn, there are just too many great scenes for this to be considered a bad movie. Also the score and title song are both excellent. Yes, it all begins to fall apart under its own weight during the slow, ponderous outer space scenes, but the final scene makes it all worth it. "I think he's attempting re-entry, Sir".

    As for the whole Blofeld storyline not making sense from You Only Live Twice to OHMSS (how come Blofeld doesn't recognise Bond in when they meet in OHMSS???), from OHMSS to Diamonds are Forever (How come Blofeld is no longer bald, and has miraculously recovered from his neck injury despite the fact that this film clearly is set immediately after OHMSS, hence Bond angrily going after Blofeld at the start), and Diamonds Are Forever to For Your Eyes Only (oh hang on, Blofeld IS bald and in a wheelchair after all, never mind)... it makes no sense whatsoever, so I just watch each film on its own merits and have fun with it. Unlike many franchises that include several changes of main actor throughout, the Bond series makes no attempt to explain how the Bond of the computer age is the same 40-year old as the Bond from the cold-war era, or how the last few "prequel" stories are clearly set in the 2000s whereas the Connerys are clearly from the 60s. None of it makes any sense, but it's all terrific fun. I just take each film on its own merits, and hope they keep any references to earlier films to a minimum so as to avoid my getting a headache trying to come up with a rational explanation for the logistics of it all.

  3. Spy Who Loved Me is one of my favourites too. What do people on this board think of Moonraker? I've always really enjoyed it. The thrill it gave me as a child never went away. Yes, it's very comical, but then so is TSWLM. I've never understood why it's almost universally hated, at least in online communities. As a product of its time I think it's great fun.

    Just checked the subs on Dr No, and it's as BluRay.com said: English and Spanish.

  4. Absolutely loving my Bond 50 set. Watched Dr No on Sunday, and it absolutely blew me away. The opening Jamaica scenes have such detail and vibrance, especially in the backgrounds. For the first time watching this film I really felt I was there. I'm planning on watching a film a week in chronological order, which will hopefully bridge the gap until Skyfall gets released on Blu.

  5. That's fantastic news! I'm 99% sure it'll never happen, but it's wonderful publicity for the show.

    Aside from some gaping plot holes and a horribly rushed ending, I thought The Power of Three was by far the strongest episode of the season so far. Really really feelgood stuff, and most importantly it felt like proper television. It didn't feel like a dumbed down Hollywood movie crammed into 45 minutes. Bravo! A few more like that and I'll be very happy.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.