Jump to content

Hlao-roo

Members
  • Posts

    6,502
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Posts posted by Hlao-roo

  1. <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">RIP James Horner. One of my biggest influences and one of the main reasons I decided to become a composer.  My thoughts are with his family.</p>— Neal Acree (@neal_acree) <a href="

    23, 2015</a></blockquote>
    <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
  2. http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2015/06/12/how_michael_giacchino_creates_a_new_masterpiece_from_the_original_jurassic.html

    Giacchino has mastered Williams’ vocabulary in the service of making his own fresh statements. A lot of this fluency manifests on the level of tone color: Like Williams, Giacchino favors epic brass lines (especially in the gorgeously orchestrated horns) here, and he occasionally indulges in Williams’ penchant for wind and pitched percussion flourish as well. But it’s in the arena of melody that we see just how simpatico Giacchino and Williams really are. Much of the indelibility of the original Jurassic Park music is due to its brilliant simplicity. At root, the whole structure is built on the breathtaking power of disjunct motion in a melody—the space between the notes leaves us hanging in midair, which makes finally landing on the next note all the more satisfying. That—combined with Williams’ skill at elaborating basic melodic cells into grand suites of music (Jurassic Park’s “da-do-da-ba-ba” kaleidoscopes across that score much like Beethoven’s “ba-ba-ba-bum” does across the Fifth Symphony)—produced a tightly constructed masterpiece. Giacchino has smartly taken a similar tack here, elaborating on both his own and Williams’ fragments across the score—so deftly, in fact, that I found myself laughing out loud at a number of moments where the writing coyly suggested the return of one theme only to skip off in a different direction.

  3. :conf::conf::conf:

    Someone clue me in on those as well?

    I think there was an interview where Williams humblebrags that he told Spielberg he needed a better composer than he to score Schindler's List (this was a 1993 Spielberg film about the Holocaust), with Spielberg agreeing but saying that any such composers were all dead. There's probably a link available somewhere on the site. As for the thing about Williams not reading scripts before scoring, that's news to me.

    Cool, I didn't know that he writes 10 line sketches that are basically complete when they go to the orchestrator. I thought Pope embellished quite a bit; isn't that what orchestrators do? :blink: Anyway, great factoid. Definitely so much different from what most composers do now!

    I also think it's cool to read he's old school and writes at the piano with pen and paper. But I agree with the author of the article: it's striking that a composer so readily amenable to movies with futuristic content would be so resistant to using technology in the compositional process. It's almost as though those two aspects are unrelated.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.