Jump to content

Lawrence Kasdan is writing a remake of Clash of the Titans!


Quintus
 Share

Recommended Posts

http://www.empireonline.com/news/feed.asp?NID=20615

I quite like the sound of this, Kasdan was a superb writer in his day with sharp and witty observations being a specialty of his. Sure, he's been quiet for a while now, but I'm interested to see how this film transpires.

And if he gets a move on we might even get to hear what JW would have done with LOTR after all :P

Yes I know COTT (better get used to that abbrievation) is not at all like LOTR, but well... its all fantasy.

Taking my mindless specuation a step further, if Williams did score it, would he possibly better Laurence Rosenthal's smashing musical romp of the original?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm interested in this if JW does the score, and the film could be good, I doubt it will be as good as the original. (What a cast!)

It would be interesting to see how JW does, though I'm not sure that now he'd compose a score as fun and magical as Rosenthal's. But I'd be first in line to find out. :P

Let's hope they don't bog down the film with tons of CGI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh joy another remake. Gone will be the beautiful hand crafted animation, replaced by tons of CGI.

I believe Harryhausen wanted Williams for his version and John Barry was actually attached at one point, some of the early posters have his name on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh joy another remake. Gone will be the beautiful hand crafted animation, replaced by tons of CGI.

To quote a user comment on that Empire News link "It's not like they are taping over the original"

And to be fair, COTT isn't exactly a much adored filmic masterpiece. There aren't millions of die-hard fans waiting in the wings ready to have their childhoods raped ;)

Yes the Stop-Motion animation was excellent, almost timeless and the music was great fun, but the film itself has an awkward B-movie feel about it. Actually, a lot of it is just plain crap - the stagey non-ethereal Gods sequences anyone? The wooden and emotionless lead?

If it wasn't for Harryhausen the film would've died on its arse. Actually it did regardless, boxoffice-wise.

That said, COTT will always be a a fun guilty pleasure. But If ever a rip-roaring classical story was ripe for a proper telling, this is it.

Oh and and are you saying that (rose tinted glasses) Stop-Motion is actually superior to "beautiful hand crafted" CGI? Not all CGI heavy films look like Attack Of The Clones you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I do prefer Harryhausen's Stop motion over most CGI, there's just something special about stop motion compared to computer effects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about it being a certain kind of 'special', but audiences today (including me) expect a certain degree of realism. Not such a rude requirement.

I can see where you're coming from, but its time to move on Mark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets not get our hopes too high.

JW will not score this

Rosenthal's score to the original was amazing

The new score will be MV with lots of "apocalyptic choir"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't for Harryhausen the film would've died on its arse. Actually it did regardless, boxoffice-wise.

$41 million in US alone, from a $15 million budget is hardly a flop... especially for a film released on the same day as Raiders of the Lost Ark!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it wasn't for Harryhausen the film would've died on its arse. Actually it did regardless, boxoffice-wise.

$41 million in US alone, from a $15 million budget is hardly a flop... especially for a film released on the same day as Raiders of the Lost Ark!

The film fell massively short of its expectations, thus making it the definition of a film flop. Take a look at the Top 10 for 1981:

1 Raiders of the Lost Ark Par. $209,562,121

2 On Golden Pond Uni. $119,285,432

3 Superman II WB $108,185,706

4 Arthur WB $95,461,682 701

5 Stripes Col. $85,297,000

6 The Cannonball Run Fox $72,179,579

7 Chariots of Fire Col. $58,972,904

8 For Your Eyes Only MGM $54,812,802

9 The Four Seasons Uni. $50,427,646

10 Time Bandits Emb $42,365,581

11 Clash of the Titans MGM $41,092,328

Source: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/yearly/chart/...1981&p=.htm

Its interesting to note that Raiders of the Lost Ark cost a 'mere' $18 million.

$41 mil was a very large budget for a film back then. Not to mention the rule of thumb that a film has to make back THREE times it's budget just to breakeven.

Consider the reasonable assumption that the producers of COTT alone expected their effects heavy film to make the Top 3 at least, and the film is easily deemed as a comparable flop. That much is certain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets not get our hopes too high.

No, as Kasdan has not proven himself to be adept with anything not based in a realistic world (the alien movie was quite terrible).

JW will not score this

Of course not.

Rosenthal's score to the original was amazing

It was okay.

The new score will be MV with lots of "apocalyptic choir"

Not a chance. JNH will do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Rosenthal's score is better than OK. The rest of the score doesn't quite live up to the main titles, but it's a very good fantasy score, and fits the film like a glove.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't remember the whole thing, I think Miguel can clear it up.

Hmm, it seems there is some tasty tit-bit facts I'm about to learn...

Whatever the outcome, Williams had the last laugh. Kasdan always was a hack anyway! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh joy another remake. Gone will be the beautiful hand crafted animation, replaced by tons of CGI.

Sounds like someone's quite bitter.

There's nothing wrong with CGI as long as it's in the hands of people who use it wisely. Crafting something on a computer screen doesn't require less imagination and talent than shaping models with your own hand. The only difference is that it can be done quicker, and there's the danger of overloading the film with it. Many directors need to become more sensible in this regard, but CGI itself is a great tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spielberg not directing=no Williams score. Just the way it seems to be nowadays.

This could be a very good movie, if done right. If it's confirmed to be made it's on my "need to see" list.

John- who hasn't seen the "original" in forever and ever, and needs to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh joy another remake. Gone will be the beautiful hand crafted animation, replaced by tons of CGI.

Sounds like someone's quite bitter.

No just tired of remakes.

Kasdan doesn't get along with Williams (or his way of working).

There was an interview with Kasdan and he mentioned that on The Accidental Tourist Williams basically spotted the film and went away for 8 weeks and then showed up to score the film. Apparently Kasdan didn't hear from Williams between the time he spotted and scored the film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no this isn't perfect JW material, sounds like shit. we don't need a remake of a crappy film to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no this isn't perfect JW material, sounds like shit. we don't need a remake of a crappy film to begin with.

Actually, if we're gonna have remakes, it should ONLY be of crappy films.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no, crappy films should be left to be forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clash of the Titans shouldn't be remade. But I guess it is an interesting idea, if done properly.

How 'bout Howard Shore for the score?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.