Jump to content

Rolling Stone: The 100 Greatest Singers of All Time


Hlao-roo
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

My God, for once I don't have serious issues with a "100" list, and it comes from Rolling Stone? My least favorite magazine ever? Amazing!

I do think Bob Dylan is among the worst singers in history, though, so I guess I take issue with that.

I don't know about the rankings, how do you even judge singing in different categories? But I agree with most of the people on there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a good list. About the only people I don't think belong are Bjork (she a personality, not a singer) and Kurt Cobain (no one would care about him if he hadn't put a bullet to his brain).

But, man, thank GOD for Motown, huh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Mary J Blige deserves a spot on that list, then Chris Martin does as well.

And if Elton John goes on there, then so should Billy Joel, honestly.

I'm ticked that Tony Bennett isn't on there! That's just a sacralige!

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That whiny, milkfed, whishy washy, paleface twirp?

I prefer James Blunt, now there's a man!

Ugh. I can't even explain how much I hate his song "You're Beautiful".

And if Elton John goes on there, then so should Billy Joel, honestly.

True.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is a horrible list, to many r&b singers at the top and the bob dylan #7, it destroys all its credibility, the man is awful, as is robert plant, ugh.

Johnny cash is a great entertainer, with a unique, but not great voice. Bjork, bono(the big turd), great singers, no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys have lousy taste, he's a f'ing horrible singer. Horrible. Aretha #1 is a joke too.

maybe they meant top 100 screamers, or mumblers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys have lousy taste, he's a f'ing horrible singer. Horrible. Aretha #1 is a joke too.

maybe they meant top 100 screamers, or mumblers?

If we have such lousy taste, why don't you go ahead and tell us who we should be listening to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No David Gilmour and no Roger Waters in the list, though Waters was a voter.

I think we're getting this "singer" list confused with what we want a "singer/songwriter" list to be. Which is why people want Dylan higher or lower, or Billy Joel at all. They were both better songwriters and musicians than they were singers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Dave Gilmore in it? He's got a great raspy voice, very powerful and quite unique.

I rather missed Gilmour in the list. He sounds rather flat in the early Floyd recordings, but in his recent live concerts he has an impressively full voice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys have lousy taste, he's a f'ing horrible singer. Horrible. Aretha #1 is a joke too.

maybe they meant top 100 screamers, or mumblers?

If we have such lousy taste, why don't you go ahead and tell us who we should be listening to?

He may just do that...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you guys have lousy taste, he's a f'ing horrible singer. Horrible. Aretha #1 is a joke too.

maybe they meant top 100 screamers, or mumblers?

If we have such lousy taste, why don't you go ahead and tell us who we should be listening to?

He may just do that...

Maybe, but I'm not expecting it cause Joe just likes to bash and bash and bash...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.