Jump to content

The RIAA's new assault on illegal downloading......


Ollie
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They are ending the lawsuits because now they will be going after you via your isp's with the help of your internet provider. That's if they are ones who have agreed to help the RIAA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are ending the lawsuits because now they will be going after you via your isp's with the help of your internet provider. That's if they are ones who have agreed to help the RIAA.

I thought it was illegal for the IPS's to give them confidential information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are ending the lawsuits because now they will be going after you via your isp's with the help of your internet provider.

Isn't the phrase "with the help of your internet provider" redundant in this sentence?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are ending the lawsuits because now they will be going after you via your isp's with the help of your internet provider. That's if they are ones who have agreed to help the RIAA.

I thought it was illegal for the IPS's to give them confidential information.

Familiar with the PATRIOT ACT?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never used P2P file sharing programs (limewire,bittorrent..ect..) ,which I suppose is the only thing that is " traceable " by the RIAA

I've never read any evidence that anyone (including the RIAA and your ISP) can control or trace downloaded files and folders from online storage sites like Rapidshare or Megaupload, which are handled by your browser's download manager (correct me if I am mistaken).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Internet Service Provider.

Ah, thanks.

ISP = Internet Service Provider.....DUH.

Ah, thanks (but I could do without your sass! :P ).

Internet Service Provider...whoever you pay the bill to.

Ah, thanks.

Internet service provider.

Ah, thanks.

Internet Service Provider.

Ah, thanks.

Internet Service Provider.

Ah, thanks.

I win.

:lol:

So...what's an Internet Service Provider?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Downloading is still legal in Canada. First they'd have to change the federal laws,then the RIAA would have to implement their crap into our country with Canadian ISP's . It won't be anytime soon and if there is some sort of regulation they would probably only target "Canadian contents"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So...what's an Internet Service Provider?

Who pays the bills at your house?

Downloading is still legal in Canada. First they'd have to change the federal laws,then the RIAA would have to implement their crap into our country with Canadian ISP's . It won't be anytime soon.

With the North American Union on the horizon, they'll be able to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I've never been clear on is if they can "get" you just by downloading songs, or if you have to be sharing material from your own computer to be detected.

That's just it most of the lawsuits they filed most of the time they have provided false information or no proof at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I've never been clear on is if they can "get" you just by downloading songs, or if you have to be sharing material from your own computer to be detected.

A bit of google searching explains it .These geeks seem to make sense and reflect what I said earlier:

http://forums.pearljam.com/showthread.php?...1365&page=2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I've never been clear on is if they can "get" you just by downloading songs, or if you have to be sharing material from your own computer to be detected.

Another good question is how they choose their potential victims. Someone who illegally downloaded 'How to steal a Million'? They had to know if it's illegal material in the first place. If the files aren't named 'Whitney Houston's Greatest Hits', it becomes all rather muddy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Happy to hear they've finally realised blindly suing customers isn't the best public relations exercise you can do...

But I'm still disappointed that none of these plebs has realised how much easier it would be to legalise file sharing and open up some sort of revenue stream for it.

I would gladly pay a small 'royalty' to composers and labels for the music I've downloaded, and in fairness, 99p for a track I'll listen to maybe a hundred times is good value, but what I don't think is good value is £8 for a digital album, where a physical CD costs less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in the end the RIAA thinks that downloading some music files is worse that get into the citizens privacy, which i think is a human civil right?

Well, and there's the classic problem the recording industry has had since it's inception - once you buy an album, who owns what? It's only since the explosion of technology that this problem has become exasperated.

Raging Capitalist that I am, I agree with Rich. If they were smart, they'd figure out a way to make money off of file sharing.

OH!

And!

Internet Service Provider

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, it's the technology that the RIAA doesn't like. During the 90s they were loving CDs, the lack of the net, and the fact that you couldn't just log on and download your favourite song.

The internet is a threat to this security and total control, and they're dying IMO because they're trying to violate the one golden rule of business I was taught: change according to the economy and customer demands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've never read any evidence that anyone (including the RIAA and your ISP) can control or trace downloaded files and folders from online storage sites like Rapidshare or Megaupload, which are handled by your browser's download manager (correct me if I am mistaken).

Your ISP can in most cases, at least theoretically. With systems like BitTorrent, it's still the most difficult, because those systems are decentralised and you don't necessarily get coherent data from just a single host. But Rapidshare and Megaupload transfers are just HTTP connections, going from your system to the download site. And since every connection goes through your ISP*, if they really set up the necessary logging and filtering (which needs a LOT of resources I'd imagine), they can trace your connections and should be able to piece together regular unencrypted HTTP downloads.

At least, thanks to the generally decentralised nature of TCP/IP ("the internet", if you want), your ISP** is pretty much the only instance that gets access to all that data. The clever people who came up with the protocol very deliberately designed it so that no single participant could control the network - if the internet had been created with more influence by politicians (or, by extension, corporations) and/or in the times of axes of evils etc., it would look very different. (Mind you, they ARE trying to get there, but the only way is to have the ISPs*** log EVERYTHING and pass EVERYTHING on and then to piece it ALL together - luckily, that's not feasible yet).

*) Internet Service Provider

**) Internet Service Provider

***) Internet Service Providers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, it's the technology that the RIAA doesn't like. During the 90s they were loving CDs, the lack of the net, and the fact that you couldn't just log on and download your favourite song.

The internet is a threat to this security and total control, and they're dying IMO because they're trying to violate the one golden rule of business I was taught: change according to the economy and customer demands.

I totally agree. The recording industry is dying a very slow and painful death because of their refusal to adapt. CD sales decline more and more and more every year while iTunes sales and file sharing keeps climbing. The labels the fully embrace the internet will be the ones that survive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, and that is the ONE advantage to CD's still. If the hard drive on your computer/mp3 player crashes that it - game over. You better hope to God you have music you purchased backed up somewhere. With CD's that's not a worry. That's why music that I NEVER want to lose, I'll still by on CD. Things I can live without, iTunes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not even if you could buy flacs Drax?

And yes, digital music does carry a risk, I acknowledge that. A friend at uni had his HDD blow a few months ago, and with it went absolutely everything - pictures/music, etc. But I've since advised him to get a good backup system, and that's not just limited to music, but the use of computers in general.

But if you're careful, it makes it incredibly convenient. My entire music collection is digitised on my internal laptop drive, and an exact copy of that is on an external drive for use at work (so I know within 24 hours if there's a problem with it). I even have a 3rd, older copy stored on another external drive somewhere under my bed if armageddon strikes.

But in exchange for that effort, every track I have is no more than 2 keyboard strikes away :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.