Jump to content

Which disaster movie do you like best?


MSM

Which disaster movie do you like best?  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. Which disaster movie do you like best?

    • Independence Day (Roland Emmerich 1996)
      11
    • The Day After Tomorrow (Roland Emmerich 2004)
      1
    • 2012 (Roland Emmerich 2009)
      0
    • Poseidon (Wolfgang Petersen 2006)
      0
    • Deep Impact (Mimi Leder 1998)
      3
    • Armageddon (Michael Bay 1998)
      2
    • Volcano (Mick Jackson 1997)
      0
    • Dante's Peak (Roger Donaldson 1997)
      0
    • Twister (Jan de Bont 1996)
      2
    • The Core (Jon Amiel 2003)
      3
    • Godzilla (Roland Emmerich 1998)
      1
    • War of the Worlds (Steven Spielberg 2005)
      6


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ID4 - very enjoyable romp with great music and smashing vfx. There is some cheese in it, but not as much as some insist. The story isn't dead serious like in other Emmerich's flicks. Overall it's very solid and authentically entertaining picture. I prefer this sort of WotW variation over Spielberg's, which, by the way, should be in the poll too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ID4 - very enjoyable romp with great music and smashing vfx. There is some cheese in it, but not as much as some insist. The story isn't dead serious like in other Emmerich's flicks. Overall it's very solid and authentically entertaining picture. I prefer this sort of WotW variation over Spielberg's, which, by the way, should be in the poll too.

I am sorry...it has been added :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 recent disaster pics which I thoroughly enjoyed were

BASIC INSTINCT 2 and DUDE, WHERE'S MY CAR?

..........Not! ;)

Oh no, I voted for Michael Bay. Drax, did you vote for GODZILLA again???? You have no taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funnily enough, the placing of the movies in the list mirrors my feelings, at least as far as first and last are concerned. ID4 is a brainless action classic with bucketloads of charm and a great score, unlike Spielberg's War of the Worlds, which is a load of shite. Score is decent enough though, I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nerd defeats an alien mothership with a computer virus created in a matter of hours on a Macintosh computer. The movie is beyond the need to be understood.

Ok, I'll rephrase. I don't understand how anyone likes it at all as anything but an MST3K style bad movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In some ways it is terrible, but in a good way.

Sometimes terrible can be good. But there is a very fine line between good terrible and shit. Emmerich seems to be a specialist in making both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

utterly bizarre, some of those are not disaster movies, ID4, Godzilla, and War of the Worlds do not belong in this poll.

who created this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. Several of these don't qualify as disaster movies at all. While a devastating alien invasion could certainly be called disastrous, it's not quite the same thing. Pity, too. I'd rank ID4 up there toward the top. But for a good natural disaster flick, I'd actually choose Deep Impact. It was a decent look at how humanity would react to that sort of situation (unlike Armageddon, which was pure Michael Bay shlock). Twister wasn't too bad, though it could've been done a little better.

- Uni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Independence Day has a lot going for it, other than the effects, the films is carried by the humor and likeabilty of the characters, with a fitting, slightly corny score.

The Day After Tomorrow is quite tedious and unfocused, apart from the great effects center-piece.

2012 has relentlessly great SFX, but apart from Woody Harrelson, dull unsympathetic characters.

Poseidon is pretty bad overall.

Deep Impact aims at being profound but falls short of the mark, and takes too long to get to the visual effects, which end up being impressive, but too little too late.

Armageddon is an entertaining movie, even if it is sort of like being bludgeoned over the head with a hammer for two hours. It lacks any and all subtlety or memorability.

Volcano is mediocre, rather ineptly made, but with a good score.

Dante's Peak has a good story and character development, but the effects are a bit on the slack side.

Twister is quite good overall, very convincing effects and integration, interesting plot and an engaging score.

The Core is solid, explains itself in some depth and takes itself seriously, good character development, a satisfactory amount of very impressive visual effects, but - derivative and uninteresting score.

Godzilla is basically a train-wreck.

War of the Worlds has top-notch visual effects, could have been better on the editing and pacing, but it has by far the best music of all of them.

Overall as far as films go, I'd have to vote for The Core, with ID4 second, then Twister.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

utterly bizarre, some of those are not disaster movies, ID4, Godzilla, and War of the Worlds do not belong in this poll.

who created this?

Really, is it that hard to look at the original post and see who created it?

I like ID4 the best (and it IS a disaster film; the destruction sequences clearly make it so).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya to say ID4 isn't a disaster film ...something is wrong with you. I mean hell aliens come to our planet, start destroying major cities across the WORLD, killing millions of people...come on now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ID4 and War of the Worlds are alien invasion films to me. When I think disaster film, I think of a film where everyday life gets disrupted by a disastrous accident, or a natural disaster, or as in Deep Impact, Armageddon, 2012 and The Core, where Earth's existence is threatened by extraordinary natural events. Godzilla is a monster film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

utterly bizarre, some of those are not disaster movies, ID4, Godzilla, and War of the Worlds do not belong in this poll.

I can agree somewhat. I wouldn't include Godzilla as a disaster film but I can see WOTW & ID4 being included because it does include massive worldwide destruction.

But yeah, to me a real disaster film is brought on by natural elements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

utterly bizarre, some of those are not disaster movies, ID4, Godzilla, and War of the Worlds do not belong in this poll.

I wouldn't include Godzilla as a disaster film but I can see WOTW & ID4 being included because it does include massive worldwide destruction.

Would Star Wars and Star Trek 2009 be eligible too because they feature planetary destruction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Towering Inferno is one of the most iconic disaster movies ever. It's not about a natural disaster.

True. I think most folks would define a disaster film as one that puts a group of characters (or even the Earth at large) in danger because of the overwhelming onslaught of non-sentient elements beyond their control. The destruction in ID4 is disastrous, to be sure, but it's caused by an intelligent, malevolent will. It's an invasion movie. Technically, once you qualify a film like that (or War of the Worlds), you'd necessarily have to include movies like Saving Private Ryan, The Patriot, Red Dawn . . . even movies like Die Hard, for that matter. Anything with people placed in harm's way, with at least one or more deaths resulting and some measure of destruction to man-made structures, would have the right to claim a spot. The genre loses its unique quality, and becomes just a variation folded into countless other categories.

Of course, my definition could be interpreted to include monster movies like Godzilla (or Cloverfield, which was a much better entry in that arena). You could make the case that the monsters aren't an evil intelligence bent on destruction . . . but I would say they're not exactly completely mindless forces, either. They deserve a genre of their own.

My take also would remove Twister from the list as well since, although it does involve destructive natural elements, the characters aren't helpless at the mercy of them; they actually go chasing after them in an attempt to assert their own intent and control.

I'm not necessarily trying to draw the absolute line here; just contributing to an interesting discussion.

What about Titanic?

Excellent point. If you include The Towering Inferno, then you'd almost have to put Titanic in there as well. Both feature natural forces (one fire, the other an iceberg) destroying property and lives--but only as a result of human error. The consequences weren't intended, but individual mistakes of short-sighted men led to the inevitable conclusions. If people allow nature to take over, does that count?

- Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.