David Coscina 3 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Since my last poll was rather lopsided, I figured I would do one where the outcome isn't so clear. I love both composers' music although I would give Prokofiev the edge since pieces like Alexander Nevsky, his Third Symphony, Fourth Symphony, Fifth Symphony, Prodigal Son, Piano Concerto #2, Ivan the Terrible, Romeo and Juliet and Lt. Kije are absolutely faves of mine. For Bartok, I love his Concerto for Orchestra, Bluebeard's Castle, Music for Strings, Percussion and Celeste, The Wooden Prince, Miraculous Mandarin, Dance Suite, and his Piano concertos. I think Prokofiev has a slightly greater range of style- he can do romantic, lyricism, ballsy action scoring, pretty much everything. Bartok has some lyrical moments but I find is very cerebral. I do enjoy both though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 1,931 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Prokofiev is my absolute favorite classic composer, and in all composers he is only second to Williams in my apreciation for his work. I adore Alexander Nevsky, his 6th symphony (my favorite), the piano concertos, his ballets (Stone Flower is amazing), the October Cantata is mindblowing and I still think Ivan the Terrible is one of top 5 film scores ever composed.As for Bartok, I know his major works (most of the ones you mentioned), but I have a similar view on his work as I have on Kubrick's (which, concidentally, has used Bartok music in his movies): I respect him immensely and I have been able to draw tremendous joy from his work, but most of it, I feel sometimes, goes over my head, it's too advanced for me. It's not a fault in anyway of the composer, merely my lack of sensitivy, experience and musical chops. But Bartok is a composer which I know will grow greatly in my apreciation for him in the coming years, as my musical sensitivity and taste will, hopefully, mature and advance.So I vote Prokofiev. He would only lose to Williams in a poll of this sort. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Datameister 1,394 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I really am not very familiar with either composer's work, but I'd imagine I'd prefer Profokiev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Naïve Old Fart 6,637 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Prokofiev is fantastic, but Bartok gets my vote with "Concerto For Orchestra" alone. I think it's "bella", Geddit?Howazabout a Vaughan Williams/Walton showdown? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie 45 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Concerto For Orchestra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TownerFan 4,548 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I personally lean more toward Prokofiev, but I love Bartòk very much as well.Every JWFan should be able to get a lot of listening pleasure from both composers' output. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUMENKOHL 1,064 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Where's Penderecki?Prokofiev is my absolute favorite classic composer,Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant 1,093 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Best orchestrator ever and the greatest influence for JW's (best) music.Sergei. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Coscina 3 Posted February 11, 2010 Author Share Posted February 11, 2010 Best orchestrator ever and the greatest influence for JW's (best) music.Sergei.What's interesting is that both Prokofiev and Williams admit to using the piano too much in their compositional/orchestration process. Prokofiev's Symphony #1 was the only instance where he divorced himself from writing at the piano. Regardless, both have tremendous sense's of orchestral coloration. I have been listening to a lot of Bartok today and his Piano Concertos are really interesting- percussive rather than fluid and lyrical. Prokofiev's Piano Concerto #2 is my all time fave concerto for that instrument. The final mvmt is scary good and Vladmir Feltsman's reading with Tilson Thomas as conductor is mezmerising.Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSM 85 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Nice one, and difficult But I choose Prokofiev mainly because of the quick modulations and the wild melodies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Brausam 203 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I love both of them, though my vote went to Bartok. Bluebeard wins me over every time!As for best orchestrator...I lean more towards giving Berlioz that title.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 1,931 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 Best orchestrator ever and the greatest influence for JW's (best) music.Sergei.What's interesting is that both Prokofiev and Williams admit to using the piano too much in their compositional/orchestration process. Prokofiev's Symphony #1 was the only instance where he divorced himself from writing at the piano. Regardless, both have tremendous sense's of orchestral coloration. I have been listening to a lot of Bartok today and his Piano Concertos are really interesting- percussive rather than fluid and lyrical. Prokofiev's Piano Concerto #2 is my all time fave concerto for that instrument. The final mvmt is scary good and Vladmir Feltsman's reading with Tilson Thomas as conductor is mezmerising.DaveI agree with you 100% about the Piano Concero #2, although I only own Ashkenazy's recording Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSM 85 Posted February 11, 2010 Share Posted February 11, 2010 I love both of them, though my vote went to Bartok. Bluebeard wins me over every time!As for best orchestrator...I lean more towards giving Berlioz that title..Your first remark I can appreciate . Your second one should be discussed in a special thread...I am aware of Berlioz' reputation and his place in music history regarding orchstration, but to be honest I have never been convinced by his orchestrations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Coscina 3 Posted February 12, 2010 Author Share Posted February 12, 2010 I love both of them, though my vote went to Bartok. Bluebeard wins me over every time!As for best orchestrator...I lean more towards giving Berlioz that title..Your first remark I can appreciate . Your second one should be discussed in a special thread...I am aware of Berlioz' reputation and his place in music history regarding orchstration, but to be honest I have never been convinced by his orchestrations.I would go with Ravel or Mahler actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 1,931 Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Concerning orchestration skills, what about Stravinsky? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSM 85 Posted February 12, 2010 Share Posted February 12, 2010 Concerning orchestration skills, what about Stravinsky?Good, but less innovative than Prokofiev, I'd say.I love both of them, though my vote went to Bartok. Bluebeard wins me over every time!As for best orchestrator...I lean more towards giving Berlioz that title..Your first remark I can appreciate . Your second one should be discussed in a special thread...I am aware of Berlioz' reputation and his place in music history regarding orchstration, but to be honest I have never been convinced by his orchestrations.I would go with Ravel or Mahler actuallyAgreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now