Jump to content

What Is The Last Film You Watched? (Older Films)


Mr. Breathmask

Recommended Posts

The problem is that you use the word "brilliant" to describe almost every film you like.

It it "awesome" too?

No, but Jason thinks that. ;)

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that you use the word "brilliant" to describe almost every film you like.

It it "awesome" too?

No, but Jason thinks that. ;)

Karol

Do I really overuse "Awesome"? Or are you saying that I chastise Koray for liking just about every film he watches?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that you use the word "brilliant" to describe almost every film you like.

It it "awesome" too?

No, but Jason thinks that. ;)

Karol

Do I really overuse "Awesome"? Or are you saying that I chastise Koray for liking just about every film he watches?

Americans in general soom to overuse the word. I heard it quite a few times in Boston :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Americans in general soom to overuse the word. I heard it quite a few times in Boston :)

In Boston you're more likely to hear "That's wicked awesome!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No actually, that's a totally different connotation. He was using it by itself - "That's wicked" = "That's killer" / "That's cool". Here it's a modifier that basically means "very", ie "That's wicked awesome" = "That's very awesome" or "That's really awesome"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Escape from Alcatraz

absolutely cracking film. Personally, I think it helps that they were able to film on the island. Lended a realism or at least authenticity to it all. Next to that is Eastwood and Patrick McGoohan playing of all people, a warden. ("I intend to discover who are the prisoners, and who are the wardens"). Solid film overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My brain didn't work properly in the past few days so the only things I could watch were: Captain America: The First Avenger and Thor. While both do a decent enough job on the characters (Marvel doesn't really go below that level, no matter what you say), you can't feel like the only reason these films exist is to set up the crossover. The phase two stage is already doing a much better job at making those things seem standalone.

None of the two were really improved on the second viewings, but one thing is certain: both veteran composers serve their pictures well.

Nothing much to add, really.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While both do a decent enough job on the characters (Marvel doesn't really go below that level, no matter what you say),

Besides the obvious attempt of making the characters likable on a superficial level, I can't say there's much depth to it. It's not really what those movies are about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still, those first few Marvel films feel like Batman Begins all over again. Which in itself was influenced by Superman: The Movie, but it seems that the 2005 Nolan film influenced how you tell an origin story in terms of dramatic beats.

Having said that, the new Captain America film is supposed to be much better. I might go and see it this afternoom, actually.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh?

Those first few films were origin stories, which is a vital aspect of any superhero mythos. It defines not only who he is, but his prime motivations for becoming a hero/crime fighter. The only thing they really had in common with Batman Begins and Superman The Movie was that those were origin stories too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iron Man probably did the best job making Stark a fleshed-out character, and did it entirely while he was an adult. It's the only one that I feel is a great film, and not just a "Superhero Movie".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh?

Those first few films were origin stories, which is a vital aspect of any superhero mythos. It defines not only who he is, but his prime motivations for becoming a hero/crime fighter. The only thing they really had in common with Batman Begins and Superman The Movie was that those were origin stories too.

Which is exactly what I'm talking about. Origins are boring.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've certainly done better with superhero mythos over the last 30 years, and in many cases needing to reinvent established ones. Back in the day, the origin story for the hero or villain was very simplistic and short. Even someone like Stan Lee was much better at the philosophical motivations of the superhero then their actual origin, birth or transition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, I've just seen Captain America: The Winter Soldier and... it is actually much better than the previous film. Which seems to be the case with pretty much every Phase 2 film in Marvel repertoire so far. Doesn't really feel like a superhero film at all, more of a Bourne-like espionage thriller. A bit more grounded and physical as opposed to the more CG-heavy blockbusters around it. There is a lot of computer graphics in here as well, of course, but probably used with slightly more restraint (at least in the first two thirds). Captain America himself is much more bad-ass than he was portrayed in previous two films, in terms of action sequences at least. It's obviously still silly, but at least puts the character in an environment that actually seems to at least add something to the subject (thin this layer subject might be) and changes the universe's status quo somewhat. The ironic thing is the story feels more like an esemble piece, rather than Cap film. It's nice to see him wearing the WWII outfit again.

Predictable as a whole, but often exciting. At least for me. Didn't seem to engage 12-year olds very much. And there were plenty of them.

Oh, Alan Silvestri's theme is indeed in the film, at the very start. Not sure if tracked or not, though. The rest of the music I can't really recall.

There is a mid-credit scene as well, directly leading into The Avengers 2.

Karol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question about the film - I read that Hayley Atwell (Agent Carter) was in the film, but she was a character from the 1940s, and Cap is in the present day now. How do they work her into the story?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That film was way better than I expected it to be

Not sure a sequel is necessary at all, though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought it tried too hard like most comedies these days. I enjoyed the Depp cameo though.

Lolita

Never thought I wouldn't enjoy a Kubrick film, but this was a mess. A disturbingly comic telling of pedophilia and incest. The story and characters were pointless, not to mention it ran for an hour too long. 153 minutes of this, really? Peter Sellers was amusing as usual but in the context of this film it was just weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah... if you can't get over the subject matter you probably won't enjoy the film.

But that's all there really is. There's nothing else to it. It's a movie about a bunch of old men obsessed with a 14-year old, told in a slightly comic fashion. Maybe I just didn't understand the tone or something, but stuff like Seller's hilarious German psychiatrist character being used to persuade a stepfather to let him get close to his stepdaughter didn't gel with me. Then there was the completely unbelievable moment where he decides to murder his wife because of common marital stress. What?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.