Jump to content

What Is The Last Film You Watched? (Older Films)


Mr. Breathmask

Recommended Posts

Good for those that think so, I think it's Kubrick's worst so far. Only other films of his I have yet to see are Barry Lyndon and Eyes Wide Shut.

Barry Lyndon is my favorite of his after 2001. It's really a masterpiece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You've never seen Eyes Wide Shut, Koray? Wow!

I don't think I have. I believe I've seen a portion of it years ago but can only recall one scene.

I'm of the opinion that A Clockwork Orange is completely overrated and not very good.

It's one of my favorite films and my favorite Kubrick ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good for those that think so, I think it's Kubrick's worst so far. Only other films of his I have yet to see are Barry Lyndon and Eyes Wide Shut.

Barry Lyndon is my favorite of his after 2001. It's really a masterpiece.

My sentiments exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lolita

Never thought I wouldn't enjoy a Kubrick film, but this was a mess. A disturbingly comic telling of pedophilia and incest. The story and characters were pointless, not to mention it ran for an hour too long. 153 minutes of this, really? Peter Sellers was amusing as usual but in the context of this film it was just weird.

Watch the Adrian Lyne version-- practically ruined his career as a director.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, at least Morricone's score is good ;)

Dr. Strangelove, Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb

Hilarious satire that really doesn't do much. Kubrick utilizes a handful of scenes/set-pieces to great effect. It's weird to think this started off as a serious drama, and that Sellers playing multiple characters was stipulated in his contract. Anyway, it's time for the classic Kubrick to take center stage. Exciting, as I haven't watched them in a long time. Looking back at the first half of his career, most of it was really different than the stuff that would follow. An odd dichotomy to his filmography in terms of storytelling techniques and editing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Koray, just read the Nabokov novel. Kubrick couldn't add the flesh he wanted to show in 1962, apart from that it's all a big, gaudy tragi-comedy full of black humour. It's the tragedy of a ridiculous man and Mason wonderfully acts the world-weary intellectual lusting after a dumb teenage girl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I felt like it wasn't meant for the 60s, particularly when Lolita's mother asks him if her dress is too showy and she's completely covered.

I can't be the only one who thinks it was too long, though, am I? It was such a drag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. It also drags if i feel rather neutral about it. I can appreciate the value of 2001, it's still not a movie i would recommend anyone looking for a breezy 3 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drunken Angel

It's certainly an intriguing early entry in Kurosawa's filmography... even if it isn't as mesmerizing and thought-provoking like Rashomon, his fingerprints are all over it. The well-composed shots and well-spotted score by Fumo Hayasaka, as well as Kurosawa's favorite collaborator Toshio Mifune (almost unrecognizable clean-shaven).

It's certainly an eye-opener in terms of Japanese culture, the yakuza system, and the morale of Japanese people but in terms of introducing people to Kurosawa's work -- too rough and doesn't really show the director at his peak. But it's certainly worth a watch.

Haxan: Witchcraft Through the Ages

It's partly fascinating, part bewildering, and partly sleep-inducing. The semi-documentary approach is cute at first glance, but it gets annoying and repetitive. However, the second and third 'chapters' are rather well-done, with the surreal sequences of stuff like a woman given 'birth' to several demons, the interrogation of the old woman, or cavorting maidens literally kissing the devil's ass. The cinematic approach is quite accomplished for a 1920s silent film, especially in those chapters.

But the other half ... I could barely keep from dozing off. I mean, seriously, half of this movie is a good solution to insomnia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In The Loop

A biting political satire about the prelude of the US and UK's decision to go to war in Iraq, and how low level politicians and anonymous civil servants have monumental effects on the decision making in the upper end of the leadership spectrum.

Like The Tick Of It, by the same makers and the same cast (largely) it never actually mentions the political parties or mentions real politicians, but anyone with even a slight grasp of political realities can figure out what's going on.

With much of it taking place in the USA, the film feels like an anti-West Wing in that the glamour and nobility of that show is turned up side down and the mid-level echelon's of the US government is a vapid pit filled with people only there to serve their own careers and self-interest. Civil servants and political aids attaching themselves to whatever politician might be going up the ladder.

In the UK things arent much better then a cabinet minister accidentally lets slip on the radio that he thinks the war is "unforeseeable" when ordered to dumb that comment down prattles about "climbing the mountain of conflict" and gets sucked into a political arena where he seems out of his dept. But the thing is that nearly everyone in the film seems out of their depth, not in possession of the full facts, stressed, drunk, or simply incompetent.

The cast is excellent, with many of the English ones regulars from The Thick Of It playing different (but similar) roles, augmented with a fine American cast. Tom Holland is a lead of sorts as the utterly clueless minister, while Peter Capaldi is one of the few who plays the exact same character he is known for in The Thick Of It, the acid spewing viper Malcolm Tucker. Capaldi is brilliant in the manic energy he brings in a role that involves him suddenly appearing out of the blue and biting people's heads of for their mistake. Like many of the characters, he swears. But Malcolm Tucker makes foul language seem like a work of dark poetry.

He is also the only one who actually seems competent. and as the PM's enforcer pretty much arranges for the "war in the Middle East" to be assured. For reasons that are never really made clear in the film. Does war even need a reason to begin?

Political satire often loses effectiveness because it simplifies issues and takes too obvious a stance one way or another. In The Loop is a very labyrinthine commentary that shows how information is leaked, spun and manipulated on a "staff" level that the normal public is hardly ever aware of. It doesnt take any real stance in whether going to war is good or bad, only that the decisions are made purely because of political interests that have nothing to with why we think countries go to war.

Why did the second Gulf War start? It wasnt clear at the time, and many years alter it still isnt.

It would not surprise me if it happened in a way that was portrayed in In The Loop though....


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thor: The Dark World: Some of it works (Loki), some of it doesn't work (Thor/Jane Foster). In the end, the film is nothing more than a CGI-fest (and often reminiscent of the SW Prequels, albeit less wooden). As usual with Marvel, the film's climax worked on my nerves. 4/10

Thor-The-Dark-World-Loki-Posterjpg_zps9f

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nebraska.

After being disappointed by The Descendants, this is a much, much stronger film from Alexander Payne, and could possible be as good as his best - Sideways. It's not as outright funny as that one, but the humour in this one is very, very well thought out and written. As with the best comedies, it stems from observations of the human behaviour, it's the kind of that doesn't make your mouth laugh our loud, but rather your mind. And that's one side of the coin. The other side is a tender and delicately put together road trip/father-son film with great performances from every single one of the cast (if anything, just watch the film for the character of the mom). It feels small, but leaves a big mark. 5/5

Anyone who found The Descendants to be pretentious melodrama with an annoyingly fake performance from Clooney, you needn't worry. There's none of that here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Foreign Correspondent

Joel McCrea is particularly enjoyable as the correspondent in question, the mix of humour and drama reminiscent of Cary Grant's Hitchcock roles. After that was quite taken by Sanders who does his usual bit with style. The climax of the film is something else with the plane crash, first of all starting with that brilliant shot zooming in on the flying model which changes to show the interior of the plane. Looked hellish with the water and all, reminded of a story from Poseidon Adventure how Hackman and the boy was almost lost on set.

Trivially, I recall when studying "Cinema in History" or some such the propaganda radio speech at the end of the film. Classic example of propaganda in film and better handled than other films of the era.

"It's death coming to London...don't tune me out...it's a big story and you're part of it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cowboys

enjoyable movie. The more I see it, the more it grows on me. Initially it was Wayne/Andersen's interaction with the kids. The very first time one of the kids looks at him in the class he gives a hard look back. Then gradually as they learn the ropes, paternal but not heavily so because he once was a kid doing the same thing. Kids both keen to impress but also maybe to grow up. Yet a brutal film (maybe not greatly so), one of the boys is tramped to death, another is roughed up by Bruce Dern and on top of that you see Wayne knocked about which doesn't often happen. The real bite is in the final quarter as after Wayne's death the boys set about getting the herd back, and with the help of Roscoe Lee Browne, do so and with violence. The boys become cowboys.

Wayne himself is quite good, his scene with Bruce Dern a key example. Bruce Dern slimy, creepy and gets a deserved comeuppence and of course Roscoe Lee Browne who suggests a menace deep down whilst handling a 'mother hen' role with the kids.

And of course, the score. At once light and humourous (Learning the Ropes, School Boys of Cowboys) and then dark, dramatic and moving (A Sad Day, Stealing Back the Herd).

"I regret trifling with married women. I'm thoroughly ashamed at cheating at cards. I deplore my occasional departures from the truth. Forgive me for taking your name in vain, my Saturday drunkenness, my Sunday sloth. Above all, forgive me for the men I've killed in anger

[eyes shifting to Asa Watts]

and those I am about to."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Batman (1989) (from my newly purchased steelbook)

Well, we had said it again...

Burton's Batman is THE Batman for me.

And the music is the 50% of this film. It makes it so theatrical and operatic, that it gives you goosebumps to watch.

By the way, I just saw the original trailer.

Hmm... I felt embarassed watching it and it seemed pretty akward! Why no music for the most part?

I thought at first it was fan made!


A Clockwork Orange

Kubrick's opus.

Saw it recently.

I like other Kubrick films much better (The Shining, 2001, Full Metal Jacket, Barry Lyndon)

Well, I guess the theme wasn't something that affected me (and not the direction, or something else which were as always great).(also McDowell frightens me, but again I guess that was the purpose!)

Still want to see Dr. Strangelove after all that I have heard, but as I've said another time, it's in a genre that I don't like at all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not according to Koray (fails to enjoy Lolita) and filmmusic (fails to enjoy A Clockwork Orange). However, I generally agree with your statement but I don't like 'm all equally. I do have my favorites. 2001, of course, is his Magnum Opus followed by Eyes Wide Shut these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

King Kong '76

a strangely entertaining film, I say that as in some places it's quite naff. Man in a gorilla suit, back projection and so forth but this time round it has Charles Grodin going for it -pure corporate creep. Rene Auberjonois (any non-Odo apprearance is welcomed), Jessica Lange's legs, even Jeff Bridges who seems faintly uninterested at times (or maybe it's just me) -maybe this is how the Dude ended up as you see him in Big Lebrowski, he was on this King Kong caper.

Oh, and most importantly, John Barry. The measure of a man in doing sublime music no matter the film. At times the instrumental for "Are You In There?" is quite beautiful, haunting even -beauty and the beast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a bad, uneven film, but hugely entertaining.

Definitely uneven and maybe a tad longer than it should've been. Virtually an hour longer than the original. Still, I imagine this is still better than King Kong Lives!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.