Jump to content

What Is The Last Film You Watched? (Older Films)


Mr. Breathmask
 Share

Recommended Posts

the best way to do it Johnny is to wait for a foggy night where you can stay up late and watch it in b&w with a big ole bowl of buttered popcorn. IN the Dark of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to watch it in B&W, I have heard several good things about it. I know Darabont has mentioned that it is his preference, because it is much more reminiscent of the monster movies from the past.

Even in B&W, I think there's too many creature effects in it. It's not a bad film, I think I even thought it was good, but I still felt you saw too much of the monsters, compared to what you "saw" of them in the novella.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With The Mist, seeing the monsters is part of the deal for me. I don't think not seeing them would've contributed anything to the film. We had to see them in order to get scared and they were necessary for our bewilderment (How?! Why?! When?!). Also, the monsters changed. You never new what kind of horror was up next. It wasn't just one monster that needed to remain mysterious.

In the end, it's not really about the monsters anyway.

Law Abiding Citizen: Totally unbelievable, full of cheap sensation, yet watchable because of it. 4/10

lawabidingcitizenpic3.jpg

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adventures of Don Juan

Not quite as rousing as his classic Adventures of Robin Hood, this final Errol Flynn swashbuckler is good fun. You can clearly see Flynn is showing signs of alcohol and drug use, and noticeably haggard in some scenes. Max Steiner's score is wonderful, and I can't wait for Tribute to release that glorious re-recording.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With The Mist, seeing the monsters is part of the deal for me. I don't think not seeing them would've contributed anything to the film. We had to see them in order to get scared and they were necessary for our bewilderment (How?! Why?! When?!). Also, the monsters changed. You never new what kind of horror was up next. It wasn't just one monster that needed to remain mysterious.

In the end, it's not really about the monsters anyway.

Alex

I agree with everything you said about the Mist.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With The Mist, seeing the monsters is part of the deal for me. I don't think not seeing them would've contributed anything to the film. We had to see them in order to get scared and they were necessary for our bewilderment (How?! Why?! When?!). Also, the monsters changed. You never new what kind of horror was up next. It wasn't just one monster that needed to remain mysterious.

In the end, it's not really about the monsters anyway.

I'm not saying we shouldn't have seen them. They're seen/described in the novella. Only rarely as a whole - just a tentacle here, a claw there etc. To me, seeing them more clearly in the movie kinda made it seem to be more about the monsters than it should have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poltergeist: It's been a long time since I saw it, and I forgot how good it was. The Spielberg influences are very apparent. The beginning was actually really funny. Once the main story gets going, there's quite a lot to chew on. For most of Spielberg's popcorn flicks there's some magnificent build up to a fantastic revelation. For Poltergeist more than others, he really leaves the audience wanting more...both for the effects shots and the plot lines and thematic ideas. They're both really effective techniques, but it's cool to see this side of Spielberg. I wonder if this was Hooper's influence. Not sure how I feel about the last 10 minutes or so. I think sometimes Spielberg goes a little overboard with the hysterical female leads. It wasn't that bad in Poltergeist, but in some places I was reminded of Laura Dern in Jurassic Park and the female lead in Always (blanking on her name).

The music was great! I need to get ahold of the FSM expansion, or at least the OST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But there are rumors (and frankly a lot of evidence in the film) to suggest he ghost directed. The camera movements, the staging, the expressions, the acting, the spotting, etc. Spielberg's contract with Universal forbade him from directing anything other than E.T. in 1982, but actor testimonies suggest that he played a bigger role than Hooper. Like Zimmer and the first Pirates of the Caribbean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With The Mist, seeing the monsters is part of the deal for me. I don't think not seeing them would've contributed anything to the film. We had to see them in order to get scared and they were necessary for our bewilderment (How?! Why?! When?!). Also, the monsters changed. You never new what kind of horror was up next. It wasn't just one monster that needed to remain mysterious.

In the end, it's not really about the monsters anyway.

I'm not saying we shouldn't have seen them. They're seen/described in the novella. Only rarely as a whole - just a tentacle here, a claw there etc. To me, seeing them more clearly in the movie kinda made it seem to be more about the monsters than it should have been.

I know that's what you meant, Marian. But again, this time I don't see the benifit from that. Showing only small details would've made the actual look of creatures very mysterious. It would've placed an accent on their look. How does the monster look like? That's why you don't show it. You don't want the undo the scariness and mystery of your creature, which is not applicable here since there are many creatures and they are all different. Seeing only a claw or tail can be be great for movies like Jaws and Alien but that's not what The Mist is after. Now the question is, how is this possible? Where do they come from? What other possibly much more hideous creatures lurk in the mist? We see a new, changed world and more important, it's changing us. I think The Mist is one of the few monster movies where the psyche of the people coping with the horror isn't forgotten. And to be honest, I thought it was quite refreshing to see the monsters in a brightly lit supermarket for a change.

Next time, don't read the book before you see the movie. ;)

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Triangle: Pretty good thriller despite the immature direction or storytelling. With Melissa George.

Alex

It was very entertaining, but if I remember correctly the film leaves some major plot holes unexplained. Still, it's a fun one to watch with friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yesterday we watched Bridesmaids again,

and Twilight Zone the Movie.

Jerry's score is phenomenal. John Lithgow is terrific. It's everybit as good as Kirk's version, better because of the music and the creature, it's the flying monkey from Wizard of Oz on meth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Triangle: Pretty good thriller despite the immature direction or storytelling. With Melissa George.

triangle-movie-poster.jpg

Alex

I like Melissa George. Don't see her much lately

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't watch Home And Away but I noticed while zapping from channel to channel that them Aussies have some really beautiful women over there. There was this beautiful blond chick in Alias and she too started out in Home and Away ... or was it Neighbours?

Frack, I just checked the cast of Alias and it's frigging Melissa George!

Alex

Link to comment
Share on other sites

them Aussies have some really beautiful women over there.

Nicole Kidman used to look stunning!

now she looks like she has the mange, what is wrong with her hair.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jennifer Aniston was in Just Go With It. I don't think Kidman is at the point of working with Adam Sandler yet. She was in Rabbit Hole in 2010, I think it was. Didn't she get a nomination for that?

She (Kidman) was in Just Go With It as Aniston's rival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jennifer Aniston was in Just Go With It. I don't think Kidman is at the point of working with Adam Sandler yet. She was in Rabbit Hole in 2010, I think it was. Didn't she get a nomination for that?

She (Kidman) was in Just Go With It as Aniston's rival.

Indeed.

I would chose Aniston over Kidman every time!

Indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I've heard. I'll see it anyway. My friends and I get together on Friday nights and watch movies while drinking and hanging out. This is a perfect movie to show for that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea. Next up is Rock Em Sock Em Robots Reel Steal though. Then Drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drive has to be the most overrated film in several years. It's rated so high by so many, there there are those of us who apparently saw a different movie, a bad one.

Real Steel is a fun movie with some really innovative fx's and it has a pleasant soul. It's Rocky with Robots, really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hugh Jackman is far more likable than Shia Lebouf even if the character he is playing is a total dkhead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.