A24 4,331 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 If you believe in a god that created the world, then yes, we would be art, I suppose. After all, not a single one is the same.Then why do you all like The Avengers?The circle is complete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crocodile 8,012 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Because it's art.Karol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 But what is art? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 If you believe in a god that created the world, then yes, we would be art, I suppose. After all, not a single one is the same.Then why do you all like The Avengers?The circle is complete.God created me, so I am art, I just laid a huge stinking turd in the toilet. that is art.Transformers 3 is not art though.My poo is.But not Transformers 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodBoal 7,538 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 Sigh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 This conversion is kitsch art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I'm not sure who acquired the authority to use "art" and "good art" interchangeably. Once a piece of "bad art" or "art so shameful I should kick it out of bed at 3 in the morning without paying" comes along, it ceases to be "art" at all.Because I don't respect that person's authority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
publicist 4,643 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 At least we still have the term 'bad art' to classify TRANSFORMERS et al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brónach 1,302 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 I find the term "art film" redundant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeinAR 1,949 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Saw Dark Shadows. Not great, but damn I thoroughly enjoyed it. You can see the flaws in the film as it's schizo. It's never sure if it's a camp love fest or a thriller.Johnny Depp owns another role. He's easily one of the top actors of this generation. I'd love to see him play normal sometime. There is no telling how he'd warp that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 He was normal in Public Enemies, and more or less normal in The Rum Diary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 I saw Dark Shadows at its midnight premiere last night. It was a very weird movie, even for Tim Burton. Felt like a combination of all these different genres and atmospheres that didn't always mesh very naturally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,331 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 It's flunked on Rotten Tomatoes (43%). It's gotten even less than Alice in Wonderland (51%). Burton ain't got it no more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 It looks about as awful as that old Leslie Neilsen dracula spoof. I'll avoid it like the plague for the rest of my life. I'm bored with Depp and these sorts of roles he was adores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Dracula: Dead And Loving It is hilarious. Nielsen and Brooks on one screen, what's not to love? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Well, at the time it was tied with Robin Hood Men in Tights as my worst movie ever. Years later though both would be eclipsed by Kill Bill 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 It's flunked on Rotten Tomatoes (43%). It's gotten even less than Alice in Wonderland (51%). Burton ain't got it no more?I thought it was about on part with Alice in Wonderland, maybe a little better. And I dunno, I don't think Burton ever had "it" very consistently. He almost has as many bad movies as he does good ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 He makes shite these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 2,274 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 It looks about as awful as that old Leslie Neilsen dracula spoof. I'll avoid it like the plague for the rest of my life. I'm bored with Depp and these sorts of roles he was adores.I'm with Koray, I adore that movie."Mina, you are in the closet" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jilal 569 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory - Mel Stuart, Roald Dahl - 1971Not bad. The musical songs were quite catchy and the child actors were good. Gene Wilder gave an insanely mad portrayal of Mr. Wonka, and it worked quite well. Some scenes were a bit boring and weird.It's (obviously) directed more to kids, so i had to force myself a few times not to think too far. The plot is close to the book, and so is the clothing, etc... I wouldn't say it's better than Burton's film, they both have their good and bad points.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Well, at the time it was tied with Robin Hood Men in Tights as my worst movie ever. Years later though both would be eclipsed by Kill Bill 2.Seriously, Lee?!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ghcv0bvzsCAWhat are your favorite comedies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Airplane, Life of Brian and The Holy Grail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Faleel 5,347 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory - Mel Stuart, Roald Dahl - 1971Not bad. The musical songs were quite catchy and the child actors were good. Gene Wilder gave an insanely mad portrayal of Mr. Wonka, and it worked quite well. Some scenes were a bit boring and weird.It's (obviously) directed more to kids, so i had to force myself a few times not to think too far. The plot is close to the book, and so is the clothing, etc... I wouldn't say it's better than Burton's film, they both have their good and bad points.8/10I liked the score, sounds a bit like williams's Superman quiet material sound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gruesome Son of a Bitch 6,488 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 He makes shite these days.I agree. His best films are the Batmans, Ed Wood and Beetlejuice, aka the one with Winona Ryder dancing in the school girl outfit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delorean90 42 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Not a Pee Wee's Big Adventure fan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Datameister 2,042 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I've never been a huge Burton fan, but his earlier works had originality and freshness going for them. In recent years, it's felt like more of the same schtick. I got bored partway through his Alice in Wonderland and stopped watching. It doesn't help that Elfman's scores for his films have been similarly tired. I haven't seen Dark Shadows, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,331 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I got bored partway through his Alice in Wonderland and stopped watching.Me too ... I felt that Burton treated me like a kid.And talking about Danny Elfman, yesterday I also sorta stopped watching The Wolfman (the one with Del Toro and Hopkins). One of the worst movies ever, I'm afraid.Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Burton will churn out a great one every couple years or so. I expect Frankenweenie to semi-return to his better days. I really liked Corpse Bride, but it was definitely no Nightmare Before Christmas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jilal 569 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I got bored partway through his Alice in Wonderland and stopped watching.Me too ... I felt that Burton treated me like a kid.And talking about Danny Elfman, yesterday I also sorta stopped watching The Wolfman (the one with Del Toro and Hopkins). One of the worst movies ever, I'm afraid.AlexHehe, The Wolfman was on TV here yesterday evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crocodile 8,012 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 It is terrible and incredibly boring.Karol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koray Savas 2,251 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 The Five-Year EngagementI was pleasantly surprised with this one. I didn't realize Segel also wrote the screenplay, and that it was directed by Nicholas Stoller. Actually really knew nothing about it other than that Segel starred, but a friend said this or Think Like A Man, and this was the obvious choice. Really great character drama with a hefty mix of comedy. Less vulgar than your usual Apatow-produced flick, but much more serious as well, I think. His productions always have a nice air of realism in the relationships and characters, and this is no different. Segel is most likely my favorite comedic actor working today, I have yet to not enjoy his work. The film is overlong, another symptom of Apatow productions, and you really feel the 124 minutes. It takes its time to get going and has a pretty long second act. With a bit of fine-tuned editing, this could have been a much tighter film. Either way though, it has got plenty of laughs and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Sweeney Todd and Big Fish are two great Burton films from the last few years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Yes, fair enough, I did enjoy both, particularly Sweeney, but I wouldn't call either great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,331 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Watching Sweeney Todd a second time was one of my best film experiences from the last 5 years. It certainly is pretty close to 'greatness' in my opinion. The only thing that might hold it from that is Helena Bonham Carter and her pies (more particularly the song about it). Other than that, wow!The film looks truly wonderful in HD. It's probably one of those films that one really needs to see on a big screen, most preferably in a theater.Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Its even better then Mars Attacks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,331 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 We're trying to have an interesting discussion here, Steef! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brónach 1,302 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I saw Sweeney Todd at the theater and I thought it was at least a good or quite good film, but I wasn't sure what to think apart from that. I don't remember it much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Sweeney Todd is possibly a contender for Burton's best looking film, but damn did I struggle to get into it. I just found the non-stop singing exposition to be really, really hard work, jarringly so. But eventually, after nearly an hour of fidgeting in my seat, I began to get into the rhythm of the narrative; instead of fighting the musicality I was being carried along by it, there was an operatic flow from one scene to the next and by the end I felt I'd had a very satisfying experience. But I couldn't ignore that uncomfortable first hour when deciding it was a four out of five film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,331 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I struggled for 15 minutes the first time but had no problem getting into it the last time I saw it. In fact, I was sold from the moment the first frame appeared on the screen. The music is gorgeous: With its mood being sad and dramatic, it forms a beautiful, heartbreaking contrast with the somber and gloomy atmosphere of the rest of the film. Burton's Sweeney Todd definitely is a far cry from the usual musical fair. I also like that this is another Burton film where there are basically no characters to root for (Charlie is another one). Again, unusual.The Blu-ray is cheap so get it the next time you see it!Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brónach 1,302 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I couldn't get into Charlie, I think I vastly preferred Sweeney Todd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 2,274 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I adore the musical, and couldn't help but be tacken aback by the lackluster, soft singing. Probably not a really fair judgement, but I really did miss the operatic singing of the stage production. All the songs sounded half baked it the movie, It looked great though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,331 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Not "half-baked" but a matter of taste. One of the reasons why I'm not into musicals (movies and on stage) is their typical musical way of singing. In real musicals, it's more about the stars than about anything else. I accept it here because the non-trained vocals sound so intimate and breakable. I can imagine that for fans of musicals, divas and power voices, Sweeney Todd must be a strange movie indeed. Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 2,274 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I hate divas and power voices, but Len Cariou and specially Angela Landsbury make those songs glow. Depp was alright, but Bonham Carter's singing was just embarassing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I don't think the exaggerated nature of musicals has anything to do about stars, I think it's more a matter of logistics. People in the back of the theatre aren't going to catch a lot of subtleties. Of course the style is also appreciated in itself, but again I'm not sure that has anything to do with the stars. For Sweeney Todd, I think both approaches work for their mediums (granted I haven't seen the play, but I do own the cast recording). I wouldn't have Burton's Sweeney Todd any other way, stylistically speaking. But Bonham-Carter definitely should have gotten somebody else to supply the singing voice. That's not a matter of subtlety or intimacy, it's a matter of music. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Datameister 2,042 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I enjoyed Sweeney Todd. I first saw it with a bunch of musical theater geeks, and they were understandably distraught about the singing, but I felt more like Alexcremers did - the less professional vocals actually lend a certain vulnerability to the music. And the orchestral backing is excellent throughout, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 I'm also disappointed that they got rid of the melodic line in the main titles ("attend the tale of Sweeney Todd"). It's pretty important to the rest of the score, being the introduction of the Dies Irae. It would also be cool to hear an instrumental version of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romão 2,274 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Indeed, Indy. It's like the main titles only used the ostinato from the Ballad and ignored nearly all of the main melodic line. And the use of of the Ballad throughout the play is a powerful dramatic device, very similar to a Greek play Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indy4 155 Posted May 13, 2012 Share Posted May 13, 2012 Agreed. I do think the ostinato is effective--to me is sounds like a flowing liquid (blood)--but I think it could be more effective with the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A24 4,331 Posted May 14, 2012 Share Posted May 14, 2012 And the orchestral backing is excellent throughout, anyway.Of course, and it's also the only place (orchestra) where I expect 'trained' musicians. But Bonham-Carter definitely should have gotten somebody else to supply the singing voice. That's not a matter of subtlety or intimacy, it's a matter of music.You know that all the actors do their own singing. Making Bonham Carter the only one lip-syncing to another voice is not only crude, it's fake. These days people no longer except these practices. Bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now