Jump to content

The Force Awakens Disney Records OST


Not Mr. Big

Recommended Posts

TPM was less closely miked than AOTC and ROTS, lending its sound a more open, hall-like quality. Compare the field/snare drums in TPM cues like Droid Fight or Escape from Naboo to the field/snare drums in The Arena or Boys Into Battle, for example. I'd say AOTC and ROTS sound pretty much the same - the AOTC OST, though, was mastered differently, I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad orchestration!

 

;)

 

I think this is a fair point though.  Film music fans who don't listen to "classical" recordings (and even those are sometimes sonically false) often may tend to get a skewed idea of what an orchestra sounds like.  Even someone like Williams relies on technology to bring certain details out.  So when you hear something recorded with less of these "enhancements," it seems drab, maybe.  The prequels had a lot of closely recorded woodwinds and percussion, which throws the perspective off quite a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

Bad orchestration!

 

;)

 

I think this is a fair point though.  Film music fans who don't listen to "classical" recordings (and even those are sometimes sonically false) often may tend to get a skewed idea of what an orchestra sounds like.  Even someone like Williams relies on technology to bring certain details out.  So when you hear something recorded with less of these "enhancements," it seems drab, maybe.  The prequels had a lot of closely recorded woodwinds and percussion, which throws the perspective off quite a bit.

 

I noticed it more so with the percussion than the woodwinds in the prequels, and mostly in ROTS. Doesn't help that the percussion was recorded separately. There are certainly moments when spot mics are used to bring out other adjective instruments, but the mix all seems fairly natural-sounding to my ear. Certainly more so than with some less "traditional" film composers' work. That was part of what made Hooper's Potter scores sound so jarring to me, for instance - the whole philosophy behind the recording was totally different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, Stefan, heh :) There's actually more close mic happening in this score than TPM, the brass has definitely been brought forward and the woodwinds pulled back. It's very evident in the mix but it's still one of my favorite scores. The orchestrations are solid. However, remember, Williams writes in short hand, and giving it to the copyists rather than going through the expert hands of Pope, Neufeld or Karam has resulted in runs not being fully fleshed out as Williams usually likes them. That does not mean that those are the reasons they are buried. In the Signature edition they are all written to be able to be heard beautifully. In one of the FYC tracks, trying to remember which one, you can barely hear the woodwind runs, even when there is a piccolo blasting at it, that would ring out in any orchestra. I write, and when I write, I write big and I know exactly how to balance and orchestra and how things will sound once my music is bering performed, whether the Royal Philharmonic, The Alma Orchestra, The Philharmonia or The Qatar Philharmonic to name a few. And if I know how to balance an orchestra, trust me, this man knows more than all us composers in Hollywood combined! The woodwinds were buried to have a more modern sound. But you can believe what you want of course. And I'm saying this as a huge fan of this score. My favorite is TPM, then TESB and TFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ocelot said:

 But you can believe what you want of course. 

 

Is this meant for me?  You say this as if we aren't making exactly the same point: that on TFA, the woodwinds were not nearly as closely recorded as on the prequels.  Have I misunderstood something?  I hear the sound as more natural than usual, despite the dialing up of the brass.  I admit that in-your-face woodwinds is a pet peeve of mine, so maybe I'm oversensitive. 

 

And my quip about bad orchestration was entirely farcical, but it's understandable that you may take it seriously if you're not used to the typical banter here.  So there's no need for lessons in Williams' orchestrational methods and abilities to assure me of their quality.  And no need for the name dropping of orchestras you've worked with.  No need for credentials.  You have nothing to prove to me or anyone else here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

 

Is this meant for me?  You say this as if we aren't making exactly the same point: that on TFA, the woodwinds were not nearly as closely recorded as on the prequels.  Have I misunderstood something?  I hear the sound as more natural than usual, despite the dialing up of the brass.  I admit that in-your-face woodwinds is a pet peeve of mine, so maybe I'm oversensitive. 

 

And my quip about bad orchestration was entirely farcical, but it's understandable that you may take it seriously if you're not used to the typical banter here.  So there's no need for lessons in Williams' orchestrational methods and abilities to assure me of their quality.  And no need for the name dropping of orchestras you've worked with.  No need for credentials.  You have nothing to prove to me or anyone else here.  

Nope, was meant for all the comments after mine. And I wasn't name dropping, trust me, I DEFINITELY wasn't name dropping, heh, it was just stating that it doesn't matter which orchestra plays, as long as you balance your orchestrations, it should always come out. As for in your face woodwinds. That choir is the biggest color you have in the orchestra, why not use it? There's a reason why TPM is for me one of the best scores Williams has ever written. Not just the slew of themes and incredible chase music but also the orchestral color that just hits you from every angle, it's glorious. e

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ocelot said:

LOL, Stefan, heh :) There's actually more close mic happening in this score than TPM, the brass has definitely been brought forward and the woodwinds pulled back. It's very evident in the mix but it's still one of my favorite scores. The orchestrations are solid. However, remember, Williams writes in short hand, and giving it to the copyists rather than going through the expert hands of Pope, Neufeld or Karam has resulted in runs not being fully fleshed out as Williams usually likes them. That does not mean that those are the reasons they are buried. In the Signature edition they are all written to be able to be heard beautifully. In one of the FYC tracks, trying to remember which one, you can barely hear the woodwind runs, even when there is a piccolo blasting at it, that would ring out in any orchestra. I write, and when I write, I write big and I know exactly how to balance and orchestra and how things will sound once my music is bering performed, whether the Royal Philharmonic, The Alma Orchestra, The Philharmonia or The Qatar Philharmonic to name a few. And if I know how to balance an orchestra, trust me, this man knows more than all us composers in Hollywood combined! The woodwinds were buried to have a more modern sound. But you can believe what you want of course. And I'm saying this as a huge fan of this score. My favorite is TPM, then TESB and TFA.

Conrad Pope says JW worked on all the orchestrations himself, more closely than he normally would on a normal film with a tighter recording schedule, and that JW had help from William Ross with the orchestrations. I think what we hear is very close to how JW intended. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, artguy360 said:

Conrad Pope says JW worked on all the orchestrations himself, more closely than he normally would on a normal film with a tighter recording schedule, and that JW had help from William Ross with the orchestrations. I think what we hear is very close to how JW intended. 

Yes, Williams orchestrated everything himself in shorthand. Meaning when he had woodwind runs in piccolos, flutes, oboes, clarinets and english horn, he wouldn't spell out every octave. Conrad would know to spread them out orchestrally as that is what Williams would want and intended. The guys and gals at Joanne Kane might now have spread them out the same way. Plus again, as I said, someone pulled back the woodwinds in the mix. In the FYC track "The resistance" you can hear how far back the woodwinds are and how far forward the brass is.  It's all over that track, but if you listen to even the runs in .31/.32, you can barely hear them, they should ring out there had they used the room mics which is what they used more in Abbey Road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ocelot said:

Nope, was meant for all the comments after mine. And I wasn't name dropping, trust me, I DEFINITELY wasn't name dropping, heh, it was just stating that it doesn't matter which orchestra plays, as long as you balance your orchestrations, it should always come out. As for in your face woodwinds. That choir is the biggest color you have in the orchestra, why not use it? There's a reason why TPM is for me one of the best scores Williams has ever written. Not just the slew of themes and incredible chase music but also the orchestral color that just hits you from every angle, it's glorious. e

 

Of course I have no issue with using woodwinds, that's not what I said.  By "in your face," in the context of what we're talking about, I mean artificially pumped up solos, like a flute that seems to come at you from right next to your ear over a really singing string section that should swallow it up, that sort of thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

 

Of course I have no issue with using woodwinds, that's not what I said.  By "in your face," in the context of what we're talking about, I mean artificially pumped up solos, like a flute that seems to come at you from right next to your ear over a really singing string section that should swallow it up, that sort of thing. 

I agree with that 100%. The orchestra is structured in such a way where things should lay naturally. I know in movies and tv we need to have things that would be unnatural live on stage but as composers we all have to submit to those whims of the powers that be. I hate it because if we write smartly, it shouldn't have to be pumped up, and if it's not heard enough, then it warrants a re-orchestration to make it sing out naturally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

artificially pumped up solos, like a flute that seems to come at you from right next to your ear over a really singing string section that should swallow it up, that sort of thing. 

 

Could you give an example of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is one that's always bothered me, because the music is otherwise so gorgeous.  This happens a lot with Morricone actually.  In this case it isn't so much that balance is achieved "artificially" (although when the violins jump up high, it does become a bit of that), but just that I don't want to hear those solos that close up, I want to hear them swimming in the room behind the strings a bit.

 

 

 

But again, I do agree with those who don't find the winds to be too subtle in TFA.  Some of the pirouetting runs in the opening and end credits marches, for example, come through clearer than I've ever heard them before - even including the Gerhardt recordings which are decidedly more "classical" in their approach than both TFA and the prequels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheGreyPilgrim said:

 

Some of the pirouetting runs in the opening and end credits marches, for example, come through clearer than I've ever heard them before - even including the Gerhardt recordings which are decidedly more "classical" in their approach than both TFA and the prequels.

 

Have you listened to the first take of the Star Wars theme? The winds were very loud there. I think the mixing was somehow maladjusted for that type of piece before anybody in the studio knew what it was "supposed" to sound like.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On April 28, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Stefancos said:

Mr. Ocelot doesn't speak to just everyone. You will need to be vetted! 

As you know, I have standards to uphold, having been deemed a National Treasure like Dame Maggie Smith! I mean Honestly... The Riff Raff!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a really hard time going back to the OST for some reason. It just doesn't feel like it flows as well as even the FYC version. I feel like the OST, as if each track is trying to speak and make a point, it goes off on a ton of tangents and is a harder listen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've mostly just listened to my own combined edit of the two versions. Each one omits contains some good stuff that's missing from the other. If I had to pick just one, I might still stick with the OST, but fortunately, I don't have to make that choice.

 

My listening habits may soon change, as I'm now about to embark on the journey of adding stuff from the Blu-ray, but I'm not sure how fruitful that'll be. A lot of the cues I'll be adding or fleshing out are a real mess in the film. This score is one that really just needs to be released in full.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SilverTrumpet said:

So uh...almost five months later, is anyone finding themselves overwhelmingly listening the FYC soundtrack over the regular released one?

As a cohesive listening experience, I vastly prefer the OST, though some of the FYC tracks (most notably the Jakku attack opening) are far superior.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SilverTrumpet said:

So uh...almost five months later, is anyone finding themselves overwhelmingly listening the FYC soundtrack over the regular released one?

 

I asked myself the same question the last time I wanted to listen to the soundtrack. Do I listen the original album, The FYC one... the combined playlist.

 

I'm used to wait 15 years before an extended release of a Star Wars soundtrack. 

 

I'm completely lost!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Mr. Big said:

As a cohesive listening experience, I vastly prefer the OST, though some of the FYC tracks (most notably the Jakku attack opening) are far superior.  

 

That about sums it up for me too.

 

Again, very glad we can have the best of both worlds!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎30‎/‎04‎/‎2016 at 6:42 AM, ocelot said:

Yes, Williams orchestrated everything himself in shorthand. Meaning when he had woodwind runs in piccolos, flutes, oboes, clarinets and english horn, he wouldn't spell out every octave. Conrad would know to spread them out orchestrally as that is what Williams would want and intended. The guys and gals at Joanne Kane might now have spread them out the same way. Plus again, as I said, someone pulled back the woodwinds in the mix. In the FYC track "The resistance" you can hear how far back the woodwinds are and how far forward the brass is.  It's all over that track, but if you listen to even the runs in .31/.32, you can barely hear them, they should ring out there had they used the room mics which is what they used more in Abbey Road.

 

Not really. The "sketch" scores you can see in the various featurettes are a bit more elaborate than his usual scores, including even the various 16 stave sketches he did for ROTS, Tintin, etc. For example, there's a shot of a sketch score showing a completely written out string section (5 staves instead of the usual 3). Really there's no actual difference between even his shorthand and the actual orchestrations - mostly, the woodwinds follow Rimsky-Korsakov's guidelines anyway, it's incredibly straightforward. Runs used to be dovetailed, but those days seem to be over, mostly. Oboes sometimes skip to an octave below, given their limited range.Triads are never interlocked, really, they're mostly orchestrated in block chord fashion save for perhaps his concert cues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find myself moving between the two. The sound of the OST is superior, it's nice and clear but the bonus music presented in the FYC is too hard to choose between!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Bespin said:

 

I asked myself the same question the last time I wanted to listen to the soundtrack. Do I listen the original album, The FYC one... the combined playlist.

 

I'm used to wait 15 years before an extended release of a Star Wars soundtrack. 

 

I'm completely lost!

 

Has someone even put together a good edit prioritizing the sound quality of the OST and just adding in stuff only found on the FYC version? I kinda just disappeared and got lost in the music for awhile after I saw that popped up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sound-wise, the only real difference between the OST and the FYC is that the OST has somewhat more aggressive dynamic range compression. But if you line up the same passage from both and mess with the gains so the volume levels match, they sound pretty much identical. Can't tell which is which.

 

When I was initially putting together my edit, I thought the OST sounded better, too, so I prioritized it over the FYC. Then I came to realize that the differences were all in my head and I just focused on getting all the music in there.

 

If you want to hear some truly different mixes, check out the Blu-ray audio channels - the fronts are clear and balanced, the sides are very wet with little definition, and the rears are totally dry and darker in tone. I could easily tell these apart blind. The FYC and OST...not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did a higher bitrate CD version of the FYC version come out or something? Last I remember the FYC was a 160 kbps stream file where you're obviously going to get a higher quality from the OST CD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SilverTrumpet said:

Did a higher bitrate CD version of the FYC version come out or something? Last I remember the FYC was a 160 kbps stream file where you're obviously going to get a higher quality from the OST CD.

 

A JWfan member purchased a physical copy of the FYC CD and was nice enough to share a lossless rip of it with the entire internet over on that place that worships those Final Fantasy games.

 

You can read about her purchase starting here:

 

http://www.jwfan.com/forums/index.php?/topic/25940-the-force-awakens-fyc-release-discussion-film-spoilers-allowed/&page=11#comment-1212844

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jilal said:

 

Not really. The "sketch" scores you can see in the various featurettes are a bit more elaborate than his usual scores, including even the various 16 stave sketches he did for ROTS, Tintin, etc. For example, there's a shot of a sketch score showing a completely written out string section (5 staves instead of the usual 3). Really there's no actual difference between even his shorthand and the actual orchestrations - mostly, the woodwinds follow Rimsky-Korsakov's guidelines anyway, it's incredibly straightforward. Runs used to be dovetailed, but those days seem to be over, mostly. Oboes sometimes skip to an octave below, given their limited range.Triads are never interlocked, really, they're mostly orchestrated in block chord fashion save for perhaps his concert cues.

There's always a reason to to dovetailing. I use it for color changes between instruments, it's a great technique. But for chase scene runs, there's no point. There's so much happening that you literally want all the woodwinds charging up on the runs to balance the brass and percussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2016-05-02 at 10:42 AM, Jay said:

 

A JWfan member purchased a physical copy of the FYC CD and was nice enough to share a lossless rip of it with the entire internet over on that place that worships those Final Fantasy games.

 

You can read about her purchase starting here:

 

http://www.jwfan.com/forums/index.php?/topic/25940-the-force-awakens-fyc-release-discussion-film-spoilers-allowed/&page=11#comment-1212844

 

Where can we find the link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/2/2016 at 10:42 AM, Jay said:

over on that place that worships those Final Fantasy games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I hope they would focus more on releasing "More music from Star Wars Episode 7" rather than finding ways to resell the same product over and over again with really awful collectors' gimmicks. I think Sony showed Disney how to NOT do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Oskar said:

Well, it looks like the two layers of emboss have finally been topped!  

 

:lol:

3 hours ago, Incanus said:

I hope they would focus more on releasing "More music from Star Wars Episode 7" rather than finding ways to resell the same product over and over again with really awful collectors' gimmicks. I think Sony showed Disney how to NOT do it.

 

Hear, hear!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So has anyone preordered the vinyl yet?  Holograms or not, it's very tempting to have TFA on vinyl like the OT... (and hopefully Disney will release the prequel ones individually at some point)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rpvee said:

So has anyone preordered the vinyl yet?  Holograms or not, it's very tempting to have TFA on vinyl like the OT... (and hopefully Disney will release the prequel ones individually at some point)

 

I preordered it on Amazon back in December!

 

Thanks to Amazon's preorder price guarantee combined with them underestimating the final price, I'm getting it at a $15 discount!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I picked up the vinyl this morning!  Has anyone else gotten it?

 

It's really satisfying to see it next to the original trilogy records.  My record player isn't anything to write home about, but TFA sounded great to my ear, and while the hologram thing is definitely gimmicky, it's also really cool and amazing technology I really enjoyed seeing.

 

Overall, a great release, in my opinion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, rpvee said:

I picked up the vinyl this morning!  Has anyone else gotten it?

 

It's really satisfying to see it next to the original trilogy records.  My record player isn't anything to write home about, but TFA sounded great to my ear, and while the hologram thing is definitely gimmicky, it's also really cool and amazing technology I really enjoyed seeing.

 

Overall, a great release, in my opinion!

Totally agree, its beautiful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.