aj_vader 534 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Exciting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 3, 2016 Author Share Posted January 3, 2016 7 hours ago, crumbs said: It won't be the only copy floating around though, if they've been mailed out by the hundreds. The lossless leak is inevitable. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarpia 132 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 8 hours ago, crumbs said: The lossless leak is inevitable. I can't wait! The copy on Ebay is already too high, and with four days still to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockdown 238 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 14 hours ago, crumbs said: It won't be the only copy floating around though, if they've been mailed out by the hundreds. The lossless leak is inevitable. Not true, that would mean that every FYC we've seen on eBay should've leaked in lossless, which they haven't. Some really nice ones haven't. But, yeah, Star Wars, is probably inevitable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Or all copies will be obtained by high echelon collectors, who will keep it for themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Breathmask 555 Posted January 3, 2016 Share Posted January 3, 2016 Greedy bastards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,306 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Already over $150 with 3 days remaining. Will be interesting to see what happens to the demand when more copies go up for auction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taikomochi 1,136 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 It's been static at that number for about a whole day now, for what it's worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 That's not worth anything. The price of no eBay auction matters until the last 5 seconds or so. That's when everything happens. There's no way this will end at under $500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unlucky Bastard 7,782 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 I'd bid on it if it wasn't in some cheap and nasty, budget cardboard slipcase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demodex 557 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Who cares about the packaging if it's the music you want? Make your own cover and put it in a jewel case. Posts like that make youb sound awfully pretentious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,306 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 25 minutes ago, Drax said: I'd bid on it if it wasn't in some cheap and nasty, budget cardboard slipcase. What if the logo was double embossed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A. A. Ron 1,742 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 40 minutes ago, Drax said: I'd bid on it if it wasn't in some cheap and nasty, budget cardboard slipcase. Can't be bothered to buy a $3 jewel case for a $1,000 promo disc, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 Humor. It is a difficult concept. crumbs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A. A. Ron 1,742 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Yes, in fact it's so difficult that you didn't even notice I was joining in. Just look at the tongue sticking out of that smiley face I posted! Jason, baby, come on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 I wasn't taking to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wojo 2,453 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 1 minute ago, Jay said: I wasn't taking to you. Give him time. I didn't take to him so quickly either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockdown 238 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 It should be lossless, fortunately. I have a copy of Patrick Doyle's Cinderella FYC on CD, and it is indeed lossless. Same studio, so there's some hope for you all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A. A. Ron 1,742 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 1 hour ago, Jay said: I wasn't talking to you. A likely story! 1 hour ago, Woj said: Give him time. I didn't take to him so quickly either. I'm a grower! Not Mr. Big 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Alright, am I missing something? I'm really curious as to why no one has mentioned the biggest difference between the OST version of the Opening cues and the FYC version. Can someone explain to me what is happening in these two sections? OST01 3:07 to 3:55 (Not on the FYC) Versus FYC01 2:08 to 3:19 (Not on the OST) They begin the same and end the same, but after about 7-8 seconds the go off in completely different directions and the both sound natural. I can't seem to place an edit. Is this section an Alternate Take/Version? Or am I missing how to edit these two sections together? EDIT: I ended up beginning with the Main Title, then going to the FYC when the first micro-edit in the OST occurs. Then, when you get to around 2:08 in the FYC cue, switch back to the OST beginning at around 3:08 and let that go until around 3:51, then switch back to the FYC beginning at around 2:17. Wow. What a mess. Not 100% sure that's actually correct, but it's a decent way to get both sections into one piece. EDIT #2: Found a second instance of the FYC being Microedited where the OST is not. Compare: OST01 4:53 to 4:58 FYC01 5:03 to 5:07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crumbs 14,306 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 3 hours ago, amh1219 said: I'm a grower! That's what they all say! A. A. Ron 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Damien F 1,742 Posted January 4, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted January 4, 2016 The studio should have added "It's a grower!" to the front of that FYC sleave. Not Mr. Big, A. A. Ron and crumbs 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 6 hours ago, zeekypttr5678 said: Alright, am I missing something? I'm really curious as to why no one has mentioned the biggest difference between the OST version of the Opening cues and the FYC version. Can someone explain to me what is happening in these two sections? OST01 3:07 to 3:55 (Not on the FYC) Versus FYC01 2:08 to 3:19 (Not on the OST) They begin the same and end the same, but after about 7-8 seconds the go off in completely different directions and the both sound natural. I can't seem to place an edit. Is this section an Alternate Take/Version? Or am I missing how to edit these two sections together? EDIT: I ended up beginning with the Main Title, then going to the FYC when the first micro-edit in the OST occurs. Then, when you get to around 2:08 in the FYC cue, switch back to the OST beginning at around 3:08 and let that go until around 3:51, then switch back to the FYC beginning at around 2:17. Wow. What a mess. Not 100% sure that's actually correct, but it's a decent way to get both sections into one piece. EDIT #2: Found a second instance of the FYC being Microedited where the OST is not. Compare: OST01 4:53 to 4:58 FYC01 5:03 to 5:07 Easy - Williams recorded an Insert to replace a section of his original recording. The FYC has the Insert added, the OST represents his original intentions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Is the rule still that an FYC can only contain music that actually featured in the film? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#SnowyVernalSpringsEternal 10,265 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 So is the Burning Homestead insert on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 44 minutes ago, Jay said: Easy - Williams recorded an Insert to replace a section of his original recording. The FYC has the Insert added, the OST represents his original intentions. I suppose that's a possibility. Wish we had the sheets. I guess i'm just surprised no one has mentioned it yet. From reading this thread it seemed like the OST track was just an edited version of the FYC track, but I was in for a surprise. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- However, I was able to edit both sections together into one coherent piece and it sounds surprisingly good. So, if anyone would like to have both sections and have them flow (more than decently) into one another then edit as follows: OST 1: 0:00 to somewhere before 2:58 (that's where the two pieces really deviate) FYC 1: 1:39 to around 2:09 OST 1: 3:07.5 to around 3:51.5 (Going from here back to the next FYC section nicely is a bit hard for anyone more casual, but more experienced editors should do just fine.) FYC 1: 2:17 to at least 3:15 After that you can switch back to the OST with the exception of very small micro-edits that happen throughout the remainder of Part 1. However, make sure to use the OST to cover a microedit in the FYC near the ending of Part 1. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The above editing is just an OPTION if there's anyone who wants both sections. They actually can edit together just fine, whether it's correct or not. So, if you want to hear BOTH and it not sound awful. You can try that. I liked both sections, so that's what I'm doing for now. For the current edit I'm doing I just want as much music as I can manage. I know I'll have to pick between some of the versions later on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 I've been sure to say in the my posts in the thread that I had only done a quick simple analysis and that others were welcome to find and post all the tinier differences. I only have so much time to work on these things. So if you find anything else interesting, please share! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 4 hours ago, Jay said: I've been sure to say in the my posts in the thread that I had only done a quick simple analysis and that others were welcome to find and post all the tinier differences. I only have so much time to work on these things. So if you find anything else interesting, please share! Will do! I can confirm 100% that the OST version of Snoke is not the version that plays under the 2nd Snoke scene. I've seen that debated around. The second Snoke scene has brass and has a big ending build when Snoke says "Bring her to me." The strings we hear in the OST may have been there and maybe the ending section was Added on. It also could simply be an Album Version and not actually used. Not sure exactly, but it definitely does not fully match the 2nd Snoke scene. Im not near the notes I took at the movie, so I'll double check to make sure if the OST version does play for a partial bit of the scene. Wasn't blaming you at all by the way. I was just surprised that absolutely no one at all had mentioned it. Thought anyone else doing an edit would've run into this issue as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 I've seen people mention that same bit of the opening cue being different between FYC and OST, but it was on a different forum. You're the first to post about it here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Having listened to this, I'm relieved really that my CD isn't being made obsolete after all, not just yet anyway. The extra music is nice of course, but none of it is really essential. The OST seems to be a pretty decent presentation as it is, or are there still some fabulous moments in the score which didn't make it onto either the OST or the FYC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taikomochi 1,136 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 The only really essential cue that is not on either release is the one of Kylo and Vader's helmet. I love that ominous rendition of the Imperial March. I have seen people bemoan the absence of the Falcon crash cue, but I don't really remember it sticking out to me at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 The FYC PRETTY MUCH covered all the highlights from the score we had noticed from the film that wasn't on the OST. If you have some extra time to spare right now, check out "The Resistance", "The Bombing Run", and the first minute and a half of "Ways of the Force" on the FYC for the biggest highlights that weren't on the OST but are on the FYC. There are some other small things in the film that would be nice to have, like a unique variation of The Resistance theme during the briefing and the Imperial March quote for the scene with Vader's helmet. Really, I just like to mix in some FYC tracks to create one long 90 minute program, rather than choosing either OST or FYC. Look at the main post of this thread for that playlist. Taikomochi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 The Resistance was a fantastic little moment, I agree. That would be nice to have in a playlist. I'd love to have the time or inclination to make the ideal chronological edit, but it's never gonna happen unfortunately. Plus I'd only ever accept the original microedits of cues; I generally don't enjoy fan made microedits made to cues in the name of filmic exactitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 That's what I'm saying - I'm not directing you to a guide where you can make your own edit (IE, opening up a WAV editor to chop up the files at certain points). I'm saying the main post ALSO contains an edit-free playlist; IE, taking whole tracks from each release, without having to do any in-track editing. A quick way to get a longer playlist. Much of Williams OST arrangements are maintained! armorb 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus 5,399 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Awesome, I'll take a proper look. It looked like there were quite a few options and it was a bit overwhelming. Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Here are some continued findings from my on-going edit (that I have not seen posted here) FYC02 "The Attack On Jakku Village Part 2" vs OST Counterpart: BOTH tracks feature edits. The FYC is micro-edited in some places where the OST is not and the OST is micro-edited in some places where the FYC is not. I think there are about 3 instances where you have to switch between them to get the full performance. Additionally a section has some alternate mixing (0:35 to 0:42), which I prefer. It is the same performance (based on the Orchestra Noise) but it is mixed better (IMO) FYC03 "The Scavenger" vs OST02: I haven't figured out where the OST opening is from yet, but it certainly sounds tacked on from somewhere else. When lining the two up the FYC section from 0:00 to around 0:18 (when the piano comes in) is stretched. I thought that the OST was microedited, but it is not. The OST has this section at the original tempo, the FYC must have been digitally slowed down for the film. It is the exact same performance (same Orchestra Noise). There is also a micro-edit in the FYC track, near the end, that you can restore using the OST. EDIT: It turns out the FYC also has some stretching in the ending as well. There is still a microedit, but it'd be best to use the OST for most of this track and just use the FYC for the clean ending. I'll post more as I edit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taikomochi 1,136 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 I had assumed the OST opening of The Scavenger was meant to accompany the image of Rey in the Star Destroyer, but was simply not used in the film, and so would still fit where it is on that track. It just too perfectly suggests that loneliness in a larger, hollow structure that is conveyed by the film's images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 1 minute ago, Taikomochi said: I had assumed the OST opening of The Scavenger was meant to accompany the image of Rey in the Star Destroyer, but was simply not used in the film, and so would still fit where it is on that track. It just too perfectly suggests that loneliness in a larger, hollow structure that is conveyed by the film's images. It's possible, but judging by the clean opening of the FYC track, it still is not meant to be with "The Scavenger" cue. It might be a short separate cue that may have been made for that scene. I think it goes elsewhere though. In my opinion, the build up beginning at 0:33 and ending at 0:37 on the OST sounds a tad sinister for the scene we're looking at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taikomochi 1,136 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Well, I interpreted that as Williams underscoring the mystery of this character that we have not even seen the face of yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay 37,336 Posted January 4, 2016 Author Share Posted January 4, 2016 I've been wondering if that music could be from another part of the film too. I just can't think of anywhere it would fit. Rey exploring the Star Destroyer seems like the best fit. Though I doubt it was meant to connect to the next cue like it does in the OST track, I think that's album-editing. I think the FYC presents a true clean opening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 16 minutes ago, Jay said: I've been wondering if that music could be from another part of the film too. I just can't think of anywhere it would fit. Rey exploring the Star Destroyer seems like the best fit. Though I doubt it was meant to connect to the next cue like it does in the OST track, I think that's album-editing. I think the FYC presents a true clean opening. I agree. I'm going to keep the opening in the back of my mind while I'm editing. I'll also keep a lookout for it when I see the film next (wether it is actually IN the film and we're missing it, or a better place for it to go) EDIT: FYC04 "Lunchtime" vs OST02 "The Scavenger": FYC is edited and I believe has also has been digitally retimed. Orchestra Noise matches again, but the tracks are just not quite lining up, they get of sync pretty quickly. FYC is faster than the OST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steb74 53 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 There is some similar material about 43 seconds into Maz's Counsel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 3 minutes ago, steb74 said: There is some similar material about 43 seconds into Maz's Counsel. Good catch! Perhaps it fits somewhere around there? EDIT: In the film I mean, not in the cue itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steb74 53 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Yeah it's difficult to know at the moment, I can't remember if there are any other similar passages in the movie that didn't make it onto the OST or FYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 1 minute ago, steb74 said: Yeah it's difficult to know at the moment, I can't remember if there are any other similar passages in the movie that didn't make it onto the OST or FYC. I'll pay close attention to this sequence next time I see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steb74 53 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taikomochi 1,136 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 I am almost certain the opening of The Scavenger is not heard in the film, at any point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offline 29 Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Just now, Taikomochi said: I am almost certain the opening of The Scavenger is not heard in the film. You're probably right, but it can't hurt to look around. I'd at least like to see what exactly is happening when the similar section from Maz's Counsel occurs in the film. That may give us a hint as to what that Woodwind bit is meant for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now