Jump to content

SPACECAMP (1986) - NEW! 2022 2-CD Intrada Records


Jay

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Bryant Burnette said:

Got my copy and listened to it.  Thoroughly enjoyed it; that's a terrific Williams score, is what that is.  I already knew that, but this new release really caused the fact to sink in for me.

Can you pinpoint the difference between tracks 1 and 21 of cd1?

Is it a different mix?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The waveform looks very different, but my ears tell me that it maybe just a different mix. But since everything is film version mix... i'm swapping track 1 with track 21 in my itunes tracklist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, filmmusic said:

Can you pinpoint the difference between tracks 1 and 21 of cd1?

Is it a different mix?

 

Williams put a different take of the main title on the OST album than what went in the film.

 

The new main program opens with the same take he put on the album, and then the film take is a bonus track

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just from reading the tracklist it looks like there is nothing on disk 2 that isn't already on disk 1. Even the album edits are on disk 1. Just the mixing seems to be different on disk 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GerateWohl said:

Just from reading the tracklist it looks like there is nothing on disk 2 that isn't already on disk 1. Even the album edits are on disk 1. Just the mixing seems to be different on disk 2.

 

I've no interest in this release, but since this different mixing (the LP mix) was done by a guy named Len Engel, i will just give a word of caution: this guy sure has a bad track record, he did for instance the first release of 'The Final Conflict', which sounded like it was recorded off a tv set. So the difference might be bigger than you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, filmmusic said:

Can you pinpoint the difference between tracks 1 and 21 of cd1?

Is it a different mix?

 

Track 21 is 3:14 whereas track 1 is 3:10.  Beyond that, nope, sure can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jay said:

 

Williams put a different take of the main title on the OST album than what went in the film.

 

The new main program opens with the same take he put on the album, and then the film take is a bonus track

Did williams ask for the album version be put on the main program? Heck it is on disc 2 already ( and three previous releases…)

 

i still dont understand why a performance good enough for release within the film is so bad compared to williams album choice, in his (williams) opinion. Its not te first time he has done it, irrc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Luke Skywalker said:

i still dont understand why a performance good enough for release within the film is so bad compared to williams album choice, in his (williams) opinion. Its not te first time he has done it, irrc.

 

It doesn't have to be "so bad". But the other one might be better (subjectively or objectively), so that's what you'd choose for the listening presentation. Then you get the film version as an alternate. And the original album with a different mix that possibly would make integrating the disc 2 version with the main programme problematic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a clue what the situation is with SpaceCamp's main title specifically, but sometimes the only reason a different take is used in the film is because it hits sync points better than the take that the composer preferred (and put on the album)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So disc 1 track 1 and disc 2 track 1 are the same performance but different mix? I thought it was theexact same cue. Makes sense then, still i would have used the film version in the main program 😝

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luke Skywalker said:

So disc 1 track 1 and disc 2 track 1 are the same performance but different mix? I thought it was theexact same cue. Makes sense then, still i would have used the film version in the main program 😝

 

Everything on disc 2 is an identical performance to what's on disc 1.  It's just a different mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Jay said:

 

Everything on disc 2 is an identical performance to what's on disc 1.  It's just a different mix.

 

This is one of the cases I would have preferred a cheaper 1 CD version without the CD2 program, which offers not much of additional value. I suspect its inclusion is rather due to the wish to increase the price of the set and offering something in return. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Gurkensalat said:

 

This is one of the cases I would have preferred a cheaper 1 CD version without the CD2 program, which offers not much of additional value. I suspect its inclusion is rather due to the wish to increase the price of the set and offering something in return. 

 

Mike Matessino stated in a recent podcast that Doug Fake wanted the original master for the OST preserved on the second disc of this release.  I wonder if those who have one of the earlier OST reissues could compare the two and see if the sound quality is better on Disc 2 of this release?

 

While I do agree that including the full OST program on a second disc wasn't necessary for this release to be considered "complete"—FWIW, I didn't even bother ripping the second disc—I always admire the preservationist sentiment of these sorts of ventures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ThePenitentMan1 said:

Mike Matessino stated in a recent podcast that Doug Fake wanted the original master for the OST preserved on the second disc of this release.

 

I don't know Doug Fake's reason, but I could imagine it being something as simple as: Even if the mix of the album is inferior in every way, someone would complain loudly for the next ten years that the original mix was censored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Marian Schedenig said:

 

I don't know Doug Fake's reason, but I could imagine it being something as simple as: Even if the mix of the album is inferior in every way, someone would complain loudly for the next ten years that the original mix was censored.

But that person could then either wait for a re-issue of the OST or ask me for my copy or just check it out on YouTube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

24 minutes ago, Marian Schedenig said:

 

I don't know Doug Fake's reason, but I could imagine it being something as simple as: Even if the mix of the album is inferior in every way, someone would complain loudly for the next ten years that the original mix was censored.

 

I guess it's one of the following:

1) One has the better mix and the other has the better sound quality.

2) JW requested the OST to be included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gurkensalat said:

 

This is one of the cases I would have preferred a cheaper 1 CD version without the CD2 program, which offers not much of additional value. I suspect its inclusion is rather due to the wish to increase the price of the set and offering something in return. 

 

On 20/05/2022 at 4:49 PM, Jay said:

I really enjoyed the conversation about placing this score in the context of where JW was in his career at this time, and how where Spielberg was in his career and personal life at the time affected the path of Williams' film score selection as well.

 

It was also interesting to learn about how Disney purchasing Fox led to this release being possible, and that Mike initially only wanted to release what is Disc 1 of this set because the album mix is only subtly different from the film mix and he had room to include the one album combo track as a bonus track anyway, but that Doug Fake wanted to include the OST album on a second disc, so that's what happened.

 

It was also very cool to hear Mike Matessino talk about being younger and waiting patiently for a new Williams score to arrive in stores, the frustration with hearing cool Williams music that couldn't be purchased (like his Amazing Stories scores), and copying the SpaceCamp LP to cassette, but doing it in chronological order, to listen to on his walkman.  I did this exact thing when I was in middle school with the Star Wars scores, playing the 1993 anthology set on the CD player on my dad's living room system while recording it to cassette, but in chronological order, also including the Mynock Cave music from the TESB OST CD and the full Training a Jedi from the Gerhardt CD, etc etc.


Great stuff!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bryant Burnette said:

I don't exactly find it taxing to have to listen to any of this more than once.

I listened to it today and im amazed at how williams in his prime this score is. Its a well round up complete score from beggining to end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this post ET/ Raiders/Temple of Doom period when he was doing Amazing Stories, Olympics, Liberty Fanfare.The score is vintage Williams in his 80s mode full of invention and optimism.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Gurkensalat said:

This is one of the cases I would have preferred a cheaper 1 CD version without the CD2 program, which offers not much of additional value. I suspect its inclusion is rather due to the wish to increase the price of the set and offering something in return. 

I agree.

 

9 hours ago, Marian Schedenig said:

I don't know Doug Fake's reason, but I could imagine it being something as simple as: Even if the mix of the album is inferior in every way, someone would complain loudly for the next ten years that the original mix was censored.

You shouldn't pay any attention to these people, otherwise terrible things like the film version end credits suites replacing the originally composed end credits music will happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If CD2 hadn’t been included then, as surely as night follows day, this thread would have swerved into a series of rants from a tiny handful of people about how we were all being ‘shat on’ by the labels because they ‘couldn’t be arsed’ including the ‘vastly superior and completely different’ mixes, without which this release was not complete and, therefore, the whole release was a worthless lie.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/05/2022 at 5:58 PM, Luke Skywalker said:

Did williams ask for the album version be put on the main program? Heck it is on disc 2 already ( and three previous releases…)

 

i still dont understand why a performance good enough for release within the film is so bad compared to williams album choice, in his (williams) opinion. Its not te first time he has done it, irrc.

He probably doesn't remember scoring this movie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/5/2022 at 4:49 PM, Jay said:

It was also interesting to learn about how Disney purchasing Fox led to this release being possible, and that Mike initially only wanted to release what is Disc 1 of this set because the album mix is only subtly different from the film mix and he had room to include the one album combo track as a bonus track anyway, but that Doug Fake wanted to include the OST album on a second disc, so that's what happened.

Thanks Doug!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, QuartalHarmony said:

If CD2 hadn’t been included then, as surely as night follows day, this thread would have swerved into a series of rants from a tiny handful of people about how we were all being ‘shat on’ by the labels because they ‘couldn’t be arsed’ including the ‘vastly superior and completely different’ mixes, without which this release was not complete and, therefore, the whole release was a worthless lie.

Nope, not on this forum. That would be a bit much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Jay said:

Mike initially only wanted to release what is Disc 1 of this set because the album mix is only subtly different from the film mix and he had room to include the one album combo track as a bonus track anyway, but that Doug Fake wanted to include the OST album on a second disc, so that's what happened.

 

 

I know that, but the question is, WHY did he want to include it. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Gurkensalat said:

 

I know that, but the question is, WHY did he want to include it. :-)

This is allowing them to increase the selling price of this set by $12  🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ciarlese said:

This is allowing them to increase the selling price of this set by $12  🤔

 

Uh... you think Intrada was going to price SpaceCamp at $19 for a single CD? Last year they charged $22 for a 26 minute Goldsmith album. ;) 

https://store.intrada.com/s.nl/it.A/id.12187/.f

 

Yavar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ciarlese said:

This is allowing them to increase the selling price of this set by $12  🤔

@Bespin I see my posts make you bored: if you tell me what's wrong with them I may start to work on the issue and give my little contribution to make your life better...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ciarlese said:

This is allowing them to increase the selling price of this set by $12  🤔

 

If charging $12 more for a collection of great music like this makes it more likely to happen with some other collection of great music, they can have my $12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bryant Burnette said:

 

If charging $12 more for a collection of great music like this makes it more likely to happen with some other collection of great music, they can have my $12.

I wasn't complaining, I was trying to answer to a question 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yay mine has arrived ! 12 days after I ordered it. The fastest I have received an order from Intrada or La La records for that matter! Happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Richard Penna said:

 

I personally doubt that they would directly do that, mainly because their costs are going to vary so much between projects. I also fall into the camp that whatever they do, someone somewhere doesn't like it, and that $12 is going towards their next project which could turn out to be a grail.

I am sure 99% of people here don't mind about the money needed to purchase a new MM edition of a JW score.

I am personally a fan of the new editions including the original album as well.

As I have already mentioned, I was only trying to answer a question raised in this conversation, and at no point it was my intention to complain.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Jay said:

How cool would it be if hearing this score again to approve this release leads to JW busting out the end credits for concert performance?

 

He can premiere SpaceCamp alongside The Rise of Skywalker :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was actually thinking the same but I think Williams prefer to choose the most commercially viable/ successful film scores in the concert hall these days. He may not have fond memories of that one owing to the dismal performance of that film and  from that tragic time. But This is something that Keith Lockhart could resurrect with the Boston Pops. Wasn't he planning a follow up album to his previous Williams album?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got mine this afternoon, seems Royal Mail has picked up a habbit of just leaving packages on doorsteps recently.

 

@Jurassic Shark the total value was just the contents (this time it was $9), didn't have the shipping charge on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.